| 10 | 0 : 1 | ||
| 14 | 1 : 1 | ||
| 30 | 1 : 2 |
50%
Ball Posession
50%
1
Shots
2
1
Shots On Target
2
2
Corner Kicks
10
Over 2.5 Goals
Lansing City
3
Over 9.5 Corners
Lansing City
3
No Wins
Lansing City
6
Losses
Lansing City
6
Matches Conceding Goals
Lansing City
6
Matches Conceding Goals
Union Macomb
4
Under 9.5 Corners
Union Macomb
3
No Wins
Union Macomb
3
1.00
League: 3.31
0%
League 56%
34%
League 83%
17%
League 61%
0
League 6.5
3
League 8.66
0/Match
100%
Union Macomb is 100% better in terms of Form
1.4/Match
0/Match
100%
Union Macomb is 100% better in terms of Form
1.4/Match
0/Match
100%
Union Macomb is 100% better in terms of Forms 1st Half
2/Match
Form
0/Match
100%
Union Macomb is 100% better in terms of Form
1/Match
Form - Last 5
0/Match
0/Match
100%
Union Macomb is 100% better in terms of Form
1/Match
0/Match
100%
Union Macomb is 100% better in terms of Forms 1st Half
3/Match
Lansing City
0%
1
Wins
0
Draw
1
Wins
Union Macomb
0%
100%
2/2 Matches
100%
2/2 Matches
100%
2/2 Matches
100%
2/2 Matches
Lansing City
0%
1
Wins
0
Draw
0
Wins
Union Macomb
0%
100%
1/1 Matches
100%
1/1 Matches
100%
1/1 Matches
100%
1/1 Matches
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vermont Green
|
12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 24 | 2.00 | |
| 2 |
Dothan United
|
9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 4 | 16 | 23 | 2.56 | |
| 3 |
Ballard
|
11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 20 | 1.82 | |
| 4 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 20 | 2.50 | |
| 5 |
Michigan Bucks
|
9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 20 | 2.22 | |
| 6 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 4 | 19 | 20 | 2.50 | |
| 7 |
Lionsbridge
|
10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 29 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 1.90 | |
| 8 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 18 | 2.25 | |
| 9 |
Laredo Heat
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 10 |
Fort Wayne
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 11 |
Des Moines Menace
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 12 | 17 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 12 |
San Juan SC
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 13 |
Little Rock Rangers
|
6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 18 | 3.00 | |
| 14 |
Minneapolis City SC
|
8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 2.25 | |
| 15 |
FC Motown II
|
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 17 | 2.43 | |
| 16 |
Asheville City
|
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 2.29 | |
| 17 |
Evergreen
|
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 16 | 2.29 | |
| 18 |
Sueno
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 16 | 2.67 | |
| 19 |
FC Tucson
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 28 | 16 | 2.67 | |
| 20 |
RKC
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 16 | 2.67 | |
| 21 |
Sporting JAX
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 2.67 | |
| 22 |
Fort Lauderdale United
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 15 | 2.50 | |
| 23 |
Utah United
|
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 15 | 2.14 | |
| 24 |
Lane United
|
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 2.14 | |
| 25 |
Discoveries
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 2.50 | |
| 26 |
SC United Bantams
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 2.50 | |
| 27 |
North Carolina Fusion U23
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 2.33 | |
| 28 |
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 14 | 2.33 | |
| 29 |
SF Glens
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 14 | 2.00 | |
| 30 |
Black Rock FC
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 14 | 2.00 | |
| 31 |
Capo II
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 14 | 2.33 | |
| 32 |
Louisiana Krewe
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 33 |
Long Island Rough Riders
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 34 |
Hudson Valley Hammers
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 35 |
Pinellas County
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 36 |
Peoria City
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 37 |
West Chester United II
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 38 |
Ocean City Nor'easters
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 39 |
FC Buffalo
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 40 |
Albion Colorado
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 41 |
Midwest United
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 42 |
Lexington II
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 43 |
City SC
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 44 |
North Carolina II
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 45 |
Snohomish United
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 46 |
Almaden
|
8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 11 | 1.38 | |
| 47 |
Virginia Beach United
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 48 |
Colorado Storm
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 49 |
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 50 |
AC Connecticut
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 | 1.43 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 24 | 19 | 2.38 | |
| 2 |
FC Motown II
|
7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 19 | 2.71 | |
| 3 |
Snohomish United
|
9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 19 | 2.11 | |
| 4 |
Almaden
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 5 |
Virginia Beach United
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 6 |
Vermont Green
|
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 17 | 2.43 | |
| 7 |
Ballard
|
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 17 | 2.13 | |
| 8 |
Lionsbridge
|
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 30 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 2.13 | |
| 9 |
Asheville City
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 2.67 | |
| 10 |
Evergreen
|
8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 16 | 2.00 | |
| 11 |
Fort Lauderdale United
|
9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 16 | 1.78 | |
| 12 |
Louisiana Krewe
|
8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 2.00 | |
| 13 |
Laredo Heat
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 15 | 2.50 | |
| 14 |
Long Island Rough Riders
|
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 15 | 2.14 | |
| 15 |
Hudson Valley Hammers
|
8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 15 | 1.88 | |
| 16 |
Fort Wayne
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 2.00 | |
| 17 |
Sueno
|
8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 1.75 | |
| 18 |
North Carolina Fusion U23
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 14 | 2.00 | |
| 19 |
Dothan United
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 20 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 21 |
Michigan Bucks
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 22 |
Des Moines Menace
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 23 |
San Juan SC
|
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 13 | 1.63 | |
| 24 |
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 25 |
Pinellas County
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 26 |
Peoria City
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 27 |
West Chester United II
|
7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 28 |
Midwest United
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 29 |
Lexington II
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 30 |
Colorado Storm
|
7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 12 | 1.71 | |
| 31 |
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 32 |
AC Connecticut
|
7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 1.71 | |
| 33 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 34 |
Little Rock Rangers
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 35 |
Minneapolis City SC
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 36 |
SF Glens
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 37 |
Black Rock FC
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 38 |
Ocean City Nor'easters
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 1.83 | |
| 39 |
FC Tucson
|
8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 10 | 1.25 | |
| 40 |
Utah United
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 41 |
Lane United
|
7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 42 |
Discoveries
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 43 |
Capo II
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 44 |
FC Buffalo
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 45 |
City SC
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 46 |
North Carolina II
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 47 |
RKC
|
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 48 |
Albion Colorado
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 49 |
Sporting JAX
|
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 7 | 1.00 | |
| 50 |
SC United Bantams
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 | 1.17 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vermont Green
|
19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 37 | 8 | 29 | 41 | 2.16 | |
| 2 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 48 | 9 | 39 | 37 | 2.31 | |
| 3 |
Ballard
|
19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 42 | 7 | 35 | 37 | 1.95 | |
| 4 |
Lionsbridge
|
18 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 59 | 19 | 40 | 36 | 2.00 | |
| 5 |
Dothan United
|
16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 6 | 28 | 36 | 2.25 | |
| 6 |
FC Motown II
|
14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 9 | 27 | 36 | 2.57 | |
| 7 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 8 | 31 | 33 | 2.36 | |
| 8 |
Laredo Heat
|
13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 14 | 23 | 33 | 2.54 | |
| 9 |
Michigan Bucks
|
16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 34 | 14 | 20 | 33 | 2.06 | |
| 10 |
Asheville City
|
13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 44 | 6 | 38 | 32 | 2.46 | |
| 11 |
Evergreen
|
15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 36 | 16 | 20 | 32 | 2.13 | |
| 12 |
Fort Wayne
|
14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 10 | 17 | 32 | 2.29 | |
| 13 |
Des Moines Menace
|
13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 19 | 26 | 31 | 2.38 | |
| 14 |
San Juan SC
|
15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 18 | 25 | 31 | 2.07 | |
| 15 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 33 | 11 | 22 | 31 | 2.07 | |
| 16 |
Fort Lauderdale United
|
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 31 | 2.07 | |
| 17 |
Sueno
|
14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 37 | 22 | 15 | 30 | 2.14 | |
| 18 |
Snohomish United
|
16 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 28 | 18 | 10 | 30 | 1.88 | |
| 19 |
Little Rock Rangers
|
13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 29 | 2.23 | |
| 20 |
Almaden
|
15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 13 | 15 | 29 | 1.93 | |
| 21 |
Minneapolis City SC
|
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 33 | 19 | 14 | 29 | 1.93 | |
| 22 |
Louisiana Krewe
|
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 2.07 | |
| 23 |
Virginia Beach United
|
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 14 | 11 | 29 | 2.07 | |
| 24 |
Long Island Rough Riders
|
13 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 28 | 2.15 | |
| 25 |
North Carolina Fusion U23
|
13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 28 | 2.15 | |
| 26 |
Hudson Valley Hammers
|
14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 28 | 2.00 | |
| 27 |
|
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 16 | 13 | 27 | 2.08 | |
| 28 |
FC Tucson
|
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 56 | 12 | 44 | 26 | 1.86 | |
| 29 |
Pinellas County
|
12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 13 | 22 | 26 | 2.17 | |
| 30 |
Peoria City
|
13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 31 | 13 | 18 | 26 | 2.00 | |
| 31 |
West Chester United II
|
13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 30 | 17 | 13 | 26 | 2.00 | |
| 32 |
RKC
|
12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 36 | 16 | 20 | 25 | 2.08 | |
| 33 |
Utah United
|
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 11 | 17 | 25 | 1.92 | |
| 34 |
Midwest United
|
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 13 | 16 | 25 | 1.92 | |
| 35 |
SF Glens
|
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 16 | 11 | 25 | 1.79 | |
| 36 |
Black Rock FC
|
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 25 | 1.79 | |
| 37 |
Lane United
|
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 25 | 1.79 | |
| 38 |
Discoveries
|
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 26 | 20 | 6 | 25 | 1.92 | |
| 39 |
Capo II
|
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 14 | 17 | 24 | 2.00 | |
| 40 |
Ocean City Nor'easters
|
13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 29 | 18 | 11 | 24 | 1.85 | |
| 41 |
Lexington II
|
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 24 | 2.00 | |
| 42 |
Sporting JAX
|
13 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 23 | 1.77 | |
| 43 |
FC Buffalo
|
12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 23 | 1.92 | |
| 44 |
City SC
|
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 12 | 20 | 22 | 1.83 | |
| 45 |
North Carolina II
|
12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 22 | 1.83 | |
| 46 |
Colorado Storm
|
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 20 | 9 | 22 | 1.69 | |
| 47 |
Albion Colorado
|
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 22 | 1.83 | |
| 48 |
|
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 21 | 8 | 22 | 1.69 | |
| 49 |
SC United Bantams
|
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 1.83 | |
| 50 |
AC Connecticut
|
14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 22 | 1.57 |
Lansing City vs Union Macomb: Pre-Match Statistics and Analysis - USL League Two 2025
These are all the statistics you need to know for the Lansing City vs Union Macomb match scheduled for 03/06/2025 at 07:00 PM.
Get a full breakdown of both teams with complete statistics throughout the competition. Check out the latest team trends, current form, goals scored and conceded, head-to-head history, and other important information.
Relevant facts about Lansing City vs Union Macomb
Here is some information about Lansing City vs Union Macomb that could prove helpful in your analysis of the match:
Over 9.5 corners: The last 3 matches involving Lansing City have had over 9.5 corners.
Winless: Lansing City is currently on a run of 6 consecutive matches without winning in the competition.
Matches with goals conceded: Lansing City has conceded at least one goal in their last 6 matches in the competition.
Defeats: Lansing City has suffered 6 straight losses in the competition.
Over 2.5 goals: The last 3 matches involving Lansing City have seen over 2.5 goals scored.
Under 9.5 corners: The last 3 matches involving Union Macomb have had under 9.5 corners.
Winless: Union Macomb is currently on a run of 3 consecutive matches without winning in the competition.
Matches with goals conceded: Union Macomb has conceded at least one goal in their last 4 matches in the competition.
And now here is a list of statistical probabilities for the upcoming Lansing City vs Union Macomb match in the USL League Two.
Stat Probabilities for Lansing City vs Union Macomb
Here are the percentage chances that certain statistical events will happen in Lansing City vs Union Macomb, according to our projection system.
Over 2.5 goals: The combination of stats for Lansing City and Union Macomb show that there is 17% chance of over 2.5 goals scored in this match.
Aside from all the different stats for this match, you can also check out our free predictions for this and other matches, which provide more important details.
Overall Performance of Lansing City vs Union Macomb
Let's now take a look at how Lansing City and Union Macomb have performed thus far in the USL League Two. Lansing City has played 4 matches and has a record of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 4 losses.
Meanwhile, Union Macomb has 2 wins, 1 draws, and 2 losses in 5 matches thus far.
So based on those numbers, Lansing City has a win rate of 0%, while Union Macomb has come out on top in 40% of their matches.
Lansing City - Home performance
Lansing City has played at home 0 times in the USL League Two, and has the following record in those matches:
Wins: 0
Draws: 0
Defeats: 0
That gives Lansing City a 0% win rate at their home stadium. They have been held to draws 0% of the time, while losses make up 0% of their home matches.
Union Macomb - Away performance
On the opposite side, Union Macomb has played 3 away matches thus far, and these are their numbers as the visiting side:
Wins: 1
Draws: 0
Defeats: 2
In terms of percentages, Union Macomb has won 33% of away matches. They have drawn with their hosts in 0% of those matches and have suffered defeat 67% of the time as visitors.
And if you're interested in finding out more home and away statistics for both sides, you can also get that information on this page.
Goal statistics for Lansing City vs Union Macomb
Goal statistics are a good way to see how both teams perform offensively and defensively. So here are the goals scored and conceded numbers of Lansing City and Union Macomb ahead of their upcoming matchup.
Goals scored
Lansing City has scored a total of 3 goals so far in the USL League Two, while their opponent Union Macomb has found the back of the net 5 times to date.
Based on average goals scored, Lansing City has an average of 0.75 goals scored in this current campaign, and Union Macomb has scored 1 on average.
These scoring statistics help give a deeper understanding of the two sides' attacking ability thus far in the competition. And if you'd like to see more detailed stats of the two teams, the APWin platform also provides goals scored at home and away, expected goals, and first to score stats.
Goals conceded
On the defensive side of the ball, Lansing City has conceded 8 goals in 4 matches, which is an average of 2 goals conceded per match.
Meanwhile, visiting Union Macomb has an average of 1.2 goals conceded per match after surrendering 6 goals in 5 matches.
And for additional information about the two teams' defences during the current campaign, check out the tables above, which provide clean sheet percentages and expected goals against stats.
Direct Matchups Between Lansing City vs Union Macomb
Lansing City and Union Macomb have played each other 2 times in recent years. In those matches, Lansing City has 1 wins, Union Macomb has 1 wins, and there have been 0 draws.
These recent head-to-head numbers should make clear who has had the upper hand in this matchup, or if the two sides have been more evenly matched. Moreover, it may help in predicting the outcome of the next Lansing City vs Union Macomb match.
Other trends from recent matchups
These statistics for the Lansing City vs Union Macomb match are just the tip of the iceberg, as you can find so much more data for all the upcoming matches. Check out the teams' average corners per game, expected goals stats, yellow and red cards, and plenty of other information to help football fans make more educated bets and predictions.
Here are some additional FAQs about Lansing City vs Union Macomb that you may find helpful.
What is the head-to-head record between Lansing City and Union Macomb?
In their past 2 matches, Lansing City has 1 wins, Union Macomb has 1 wins, and there have been 0 draws.
Where to find Lansing City vs Union Macomb prediction?
You can find our predictions for Lansing City vs Union Macomb.
What was the last match between Lansing City vs Union Macomb?
The last match between the two sides was on 06/07/2024. The result of that match was Union Macomb 3 vs 2 Lansing City.
Where to find Lansing City vs Union Macomb stats?
You can find goal statistics for Lansing City vs Union Macomb above, not to mention a number of other different data about the two teams.
Where to watch Lansing City vs Union Macomb?
You can check out the stream for Lansing City vs Union Macomb.