Corners: LA Force 3 - 1 Chattanooga FC
Sat, 11 September 2021 - 22:00
Finished
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
California Utd Strikers |
18 | 83% | 78% | 61% | 50% | 39% | 28% | 6% | 10.72 |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
18 | 56% | 56% | 39% | 28% | 22% | 6% | 6% | 9.17 |
| 3 |
Maryland Bobcats |
18 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 28% | 17% | 6% | 0% | 8.88 |
| 4 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 61% | 50% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 6% | 0% | 8.61 |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
18 | 61% | 39% | 28% | 17% | 11% | 6% | 0% | 8.16 |
| 6 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 56% | 44% | 28% | 17% | 17% | 6% | 0% | 8.06 |
| 7 |
LA Force |
18 | 44% | 39% | 28% | 28% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 7.88 |
| 8 |
Detroit City FC |
18 | 50% | 33% | 28% | 17% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 7.59 |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
18 | 50% | 39% | 28% | 11% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 7.45 |
| 10 |
Chicago House |
18 | 39% | 33% | 17% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.06 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
California Utd Strikers |
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 0% | 9.56 |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
9 | 56% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 9.56 |
| 3 |
Maryland Bobcats |
9 | 78% | 67% | 56% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 9.26 |
| 4 |
New Amsterdam |
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 8.67 |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 8.66 |
| 6 |
Michigan Stars |
9 | 67% | 56% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 8.11 |
| 7 |
LA Force |
9 | 44% | 44% | 44% | 44% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 8.63 |
| 8 |
Detroit City FC |
9 | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 7.56 |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
9 | 44% | 44% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.44 |
| 10 |
Chicago House |
9 | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.33 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
California Utd Strikers |
9 | 100% | 100% | 78% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11.88 |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
9 | 56% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 8.78 |
| 3 |
Maryland Bobcats |
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 8.56 |
| 4 |
New Amsterdam |
9 | 56% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 8.56 |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 56% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 7.66 |
| 6 |
Michigan Stars |
9 | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 8 |
| 7 |
LA Force |
9 | 44% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.13 |
| 8 |
Detroit City FC |
9 | 56% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 7.63 |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
9 | 56% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 7.44 |
| 10 |
Chicago House |
9 | 44% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.78 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
18 | 72% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 4.89 |
| 2 |
Detroit City FC |
18 | 78% | 56% | 50% | 39% | 39% | 22% | 17% | 5.24 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 67% | 56% | 39% | 28% | 17% | 11% | 0% | 4 |
| 4 |
Stumptown Athletic |
18 | 72% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 6% | 6% | 3.83 |
| 5 |
LA Force |
18 | 56% | 33% | 28% | 22% | 22% | 6% | 6% | 4 |
| 6 |
California Utd Strikers |
18 | 94% | 61% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 5.22 |
| 7 |
San Diego 1904 |
18 | 67% | 39% | 11% | 11% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
| 8 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 78% | 61% | 39% | 28% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 4.28 |
| 9 |
Maryland Bobcats |
18 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 6% | 0% | 3.94 |
| 10 |
Chicago House |
18 | 61% | 44% | 33% | 17% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.28 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
9 | 56% | 56% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 4.78 |
| 2 |
Detroit City FC |
9 | 78% | 67% | 67% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 5.67 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
9 | 67% | 44% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 4 |
Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 89% | 67% | 44% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.22 |
| 5 |
LA Force |
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 4.63 |
| 6 |
California Utd Strikers |
9 | 89% | 56% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 5 |
| 7 |
San Diego 1904 |
9 | 78% | 44% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.22 |
| 8 |
New Amsterdam |
9 | 89% | 78% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 4.78 |
| 9 |
Maryland Bobcats |
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.38 |
| 10 |
Chicago House |
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.44 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
9 | 89% | 78% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 5 |
| 2 |
Detroit City FC |
9 | 78% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 4.75 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
9 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 4 |
Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 56% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 3.44 |
| 5 |
LA Force |
9 | 56% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.38 |
| 6 |
California Utd Strikers |
9 | 100% | 67% | 56% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 5.44 |
| 7 |
San Diego 1904 |
9 | 56% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.11 |
| 8 |
New Amsterdam |
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 3.78 |
| 9 |
Maryland Bobcats |
9 | 56% | 56% | 44% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 3.56 |
| 10 |
Chicago House |
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.11 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
18 | 78% | 50% | 33% | 28% | 28% | 11% | 0% | 4.28 |
| 2 |
Detroit City FC |
18 | 33% | 17% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 2.35 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 67% | 44% | 39% | 28% | 17% | 11% | 11% | 4.06 |
| 4 |
Stumptown Athletic |
18 | 83% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 17% | 6% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 5 |
LA Force |
18 | 61% | 56% | 28% | 17% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.88 |
| 6 |
California Utd Strikers |
18 | 89% | 67% | 50% | 44% | 39% | 22% | 11% | 5.5 |
| 7 |
San Diego 1904 |
18 | 67% | 56% | 56% | 28% | 28% | 6% | 6% | 4.28 |
| 8 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 89% | 72% | 56% | 22% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 9 |
Maryland Bobcats |
18 | 72% | 67% | 44% | 39% | 39% | 17% | 6% | 4.94 |
| 10 |
Chicago House |
18 | 72% | 39% | 28% | 17% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 3.78 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
9 | 89% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 4.78 |
| 2 |
Detroit City FC |
9 | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.89 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
9 | 67% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 3.78 |
| 4 |
Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 78% | 78% | 56% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.44 |
| 5 |
LA Force |
9 | 67% | 56% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4 |
| 6 |
California Utd Strikers |
9 | 89% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 4.56 |
| 7 |
San Diego 1904 |
9 | 67% | 56% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.22 |
| 8 |
New Amsterdam |
9 | 78% | 56% | 56% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.89 |
| 9 |
Maryland Bobcats |
9 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 4.88 |
| 10 |
Chicago House |
9 | 67% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.89 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
9 | 67% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 3.78 |
| 2 |
Detroit City FC |
9 | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 2.88 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
9 | 67% | 67% | 56% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4.33 |
| 4 |
Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 89% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 4.22 |
| 5 |
LA Force |
9 | 56% | 56% | 22% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 6 |
California Utd Strikers |
9 | 89% | 78% | 67% | 67% | 56% | 22% | 11% | 6.44 |
| 7 |
San Diego 1904 |
9 | 67% | 56% | 56% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 4.33 |
| 8 |
New Amsterdam |
9 | 100% | 89% | 56% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 4.78 |
| 9 |
Maryland Bobcats |
9 | 78% | 67% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 22% | 0% | 5 |
| 10 |
Chicago House |
9 | 78% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 4.67 |
The average number of corners for LA Force vs Chattanooga FC can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.
Matches involving LA Force have averaged 7.88 corners per match during this NISA campaign. They have taken 4 corners per match, while they concede an average of 3.88 to their opponents.
As for their upcoming opponent, Chattanooga FC, their corner stats are the following:
- Average number of corners in matches involving Chattanooga FC: 9.17
- Average number of corners in favour: 4.89
- Average number of corners conceded: 4.28
Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like LA Force vs Chattanooga FC. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.
Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.