Kataller Toyama 0 - 1 Mito Hollyhock
08.06.2025 - 01:00
Stadium: Toyama Athletic Recreation Park Stadium
Finished
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tokushima Vortis |
24 | 38% | 13% | 8% |
| 2 |
Mito Hollyhock |
24 | 13% | 4% | 0% |
| 3 |
Consadole Sapporo |
24 | 38% | 21% | 8% |
| 4 |
JEF United |
24 | 25% | 17% | 13% |
| 5 |
Montedio Yamagata |
24 | 38% | 21% | 8% |
| 6 |
Ehime |
24 | 21% | 17% | 8% |
| 7 |
Roasso Kumamoto |
24 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Renofa Yamaguchi |
24 | 17% | 4% | 4% |
| 9 |
V-Varen Nagasaki |
24 | 25% | 17% | 4% |
| 10 |
Jubilo Iwata |
24 | 33% | 25% | 21% |
| 11 |
Oita Trinita |
24 | 25% | 13% | 0% |
| 12 |
Omiya Ardija |
24 | 33% | 21% | 8% |
| 13 |
Kataller Toyama |
24 | 13% | 8% | 0% |
| 14 |
Sagan Tosu |
24 | 25% | 13% | 4% |
| 15 |
Vegalta Sendai |
24 | 21% | 8% | 8% |
| 16 |
Ventforet Kofu |
24 | 13% | 8% | 8% |
| 17 |
Fujieda MYFC |
24 | 21% | 21% | 13% |
| 18 |
Blaublitz Akita |
24 | 25% | 17% | 17% |
| 19 |
Imabari |
24 | 38% | 17% | 8% |
| 20 |
Iwaki |
24 | 13% | 4% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tokushima Vortis |
24 | 42% | 21% | 8% |
| 2 |
Mito Hollyhock |
24 | 25% | 4% | 0% |
| 3 |
Consadole Sapporo |
24 | 54% | 21% | 8% |
| 4 |
JEF United |
24 | 46% | 21% | 4% |
| 5 |
Montedio Yamagata |
24 | 46% | 8% | 4% |
| 6 |
Ehime |
24 | 29% | 13% | 8% |
| 7 |
Roasso Kumamoto |
24 | 13% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Renofa Yamaguchi |
24 | 29% | 13% | 0% |
| 9 |
V-Varen Nagasaki |
24 | 38% | 29% | 0% |
| 10 |
Jubilo Iwata |
24 | 33% | 21% | 8% |
| 11 |
Oita Trinita |
24 | 29% | 4% | 0% |
| 12 |
Omiya Ardija |
24 | 50% | 13% | 8% |
| 13 |
Kataller Toyama |
24 | 17% | 4% | 0% |
| 14 |
Sagan Tosu |
24 | 38% | 8% | 4% |
| 15 |
Vegalta Sendai |
24 | 33% | 13% | 4% |
| 16 |
Ventforet Kofu |
24 | 29% | 8% | 0% |
| 17 |
Fujieda MYFC |
24 | 25% | 13% | 8% |
| 18 |
Blaublitz Akita |
24 | 42% | 21% | 13% |
| 19 |
Imabari |
24 | 46% | 25% | 13% |
| 20 |
Iwaki |
24 | 29% | 8% | 4% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tokushima Vortis |
24 | 46% | 17% | 0% |
| 2 |
Mito Hollyhock |
24 | 17% | 8% | 4% |
| 3 |
Consadole Sapporo |
24 | 33% | 13% | 8% |
| 4 |
JEF United |
24 | 25% | 13% | 0% |
| 5 |
Montedio Yamagata |
24 | 50% | 21% | 8% |
| 6 |
Ehime |
24 | 33% | 13% | 4% |
| 7 |
Roasso Kumamoto |
24 | 25% | 4% | 0% |
| 8 |
Renofa Yamaguchi |
24 | 29% | 4% | 4% |
| 9 |
V-Varen Nagasaki |
24 | 33% | 4% | 0% |
| 10 |
Jubilo Iwata |
24 | 50% | 25% | 13% |
| 11 |
Oita Trinita |
24 | 42% | 17% | 8% |
| 12 |
Omiya Ardija |
24 | 29% | 17% | 8% |
| 13 |
Kataller Toyama |
24 | 38% | 21% | 0% |
| 14 |
Sagan Tosu |
24 | 46% | 13% | 0% |
| 15 |
Vegalta Sendai |
24 | 54% | 17% | 8% |
| 16 |
Ventforet Kofu |
24 | 21% | 13% | 4% |
| 17 |
Fujieda MYFC |
24 | 33% | 21% | 8% |
| 18 |
Blaublitz Akita |
24 | 25% | 13% | 8% |
| 19 |
Imabari |
24 | 50% | 13% | 4% |
| 20 |
Iwaki |
24 | 13% | 4% | 4% |
Check out all the card statistics for Kataller Toyama vs Mito Hollyhock here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- Kataller Toyama has played 24 matches in the J2 League and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 17% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 4% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 0% of matches.
- Meanwhile, Mito Hollyhock has, in 24 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 25% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 4% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 0% of matches.
Card statistics for Kataller Toyama vs Mito Hollyhock bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the J2 League, just check out the table above.