Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1 - 0 Xinjiang Tianshan
20.12.2021 - 02:00
Stadium: Chengdu Longquanyi Football Stadium (Chengdu)
Finished
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 68% | 53% | 35% | 26% | 21% | 15% | 9% | 9.61 |
| 2 |
Meizhou Hakka |
34 | 71% | 65% | 47% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 3% | 9.38 |
| 3 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 59% | 44% | 29% | 26% | 15% | 9% | 3% | 9 |
| 4 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 62% | 56% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 15% | 6% | 8.97 |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 56% | 50% | 41% | 32% | 26% | 15% | 12% | 8.85 |
| 6 |
Kunshan |
34 | 50% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 15% | 9% | 8.78 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 65% | 53% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 3% | 8.68 |
| 8 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 53% | 41% | 32% | 26% | 24% | 12% | 9% | 8.53 |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 56% | 44% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 8.48 |
| 10 |
Hangzhou |
34 | 59% | 47% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 9% | 8.29 |
| 11 |
BIT |
34 | 47% | 32% | 24% | 15% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.23 |
| 12 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 44% | 35% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 15% | 9% | 8.1 |
| 13 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
34 | 56% | 44% | 26% | 21% | 15% | 3% | 0% | 7.97 |
| 14 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
34 | 47% | 32% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 6% | 7.87 |
| 15 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 44% | 29% | 24% | 21% | 15% | 9% | 9% | 7.85 |
| 16 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
34 | 38% | 26% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 3% | 0% | 7.14 |
| 17 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 50% | 26% | 15% | 9% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 7.13 |
| 18 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 41% | 26% | 21% | 15% | 9% | 3% | 0% | 7.01 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 53% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 8.84 |
| 2 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 65% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 6% | 6% | 9.44 |
| 3 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 65% | 59% | 41% | 41% | 24% | 12% | 0% | 9.85 |
| 4 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 47% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.81 |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 59% | 53% | 41% | 35% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 9.41 |
| 6 |
Kunshan |
17 | 53% | 53% | 41% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 8.82 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 71% | 59% | 41% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 9.66 |
| 8 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 65% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 9 |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 47% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 7.94 |
| 10 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 59% | 41% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 7.89 |
| 11 |
BIT |
17 | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.43 |
| 12 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 8.69 |
| 13 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 7.82 |
| 14 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 53% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 7.88 |
| 15 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 53% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 8 |
| 16 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
17 | 35% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 6.87 |
| 17 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 47% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6.94 |
| 18 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 53% | 41% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 7.71 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 82% | 65% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 10.19 |
| 2 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 76% | 71% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 9.32 |
| 3 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 53% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.2 |
| 4 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 76% | 76% | 71% | 53% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 10.06 |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 53% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 8.25 |
| 6 |
Kunshan |
17 | 47% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 8.71 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 59% | 47% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 7.75 |
| 8 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 41% | 35% | 35% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 12% | 8.07 |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 65% | 59% | 41% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 9 |
| 10 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 59% | 53% | 35% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 8.71 |
| 11 |
BIT |
17 | 59% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 8.94 |
| 12 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 29% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 7.43 |
| 13 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 65% | 47% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 8.11 |
| 14 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 7.88 |
| 15 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 35% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 7.69 |
| 16 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
17 | 41% | 29% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 7.43 |
| 17 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 53% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.34 |
| 18 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 29% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hangzhou |
34 | 82% | 62% | 50% | 44% | 38% | 26% | 9% | 5.47 |
| 2 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
34 | 41% | 32% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 3% | 0% | 3.07 |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka |
34 | 79% | 74% | 56% | 44% | 38% | 29% | 15% | 5.66 |
| 4 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 47% | 35% | 21% | 15% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 3.03 |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 65% | 38% | 26% | 15% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.52 |
| 6 |
BIT |
34 | 35% | 24% | 21% | 9% | 9% | 6% | 6% | 3.03 |
| 7 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 38% | 35% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 9% | 6% | 3.54 |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 68% | 53% | 41% | 26% | 12% | 9% | 6% | 4.18 |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 76% | 56% | 50% | 38% | 29% | 26% | 18% | 5.13 |
| 10 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 82% | 71% | 44% | 35% | 26% | 15% | 6% | 5.2 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
34 | 88% | 76% | 59% | 38% | 21% | 21% | 15% | 5.39 |
| 12 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 41% | 26% | 12% | 6% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 2.52 |
| 13 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 59% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 9% | 9% | 3.7 |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 71% | 56% | 41% | 26% | 21% | 18% | 9% | 4.52 |
| 15 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
34 | 79% | 65% | 50% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 9% | 5.03 |
| 16 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 50% | 41% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 6% | 3% | 3.63 |
| 17 |
Kunshan |
34 | 76% | 62% | 53% | 32% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 4.84 |
| 18 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 44% | 32% | 21% | 15% | 6% | 3% | 3% | 2.97 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 94% | 71% | 53% | 47% | 41% | 18% | 6% | 5.71 |
| 2 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
17 | 35% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 2.8 |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 88% | 76% | 59% | 41% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 5.69 |
| 4 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 41% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.07 |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 65% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.59 |
| 6 |
BIT |
17 | 18% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 7 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 24% | 24% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 3.42 |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 65% | 53% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 4.47 |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 76% | 65% | 59% | 35% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 5.53 |
| 10 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 94% | 82% | 53% | 41% | 35% | 18% | 0% | 5.44 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 82% | 76% | 53% | 35% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 5.44 |
| 12 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 2.75 |
| 13 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 71% | 41% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 3.93 |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 53% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 3.81 |
| 15 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 76% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 4.88 |
| 16 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 47% | 41% | 35% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 3.59 |
| 17 |
Kunshan |
17 | 82% | 71% | 59% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 4.94 |
| 18 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 41% | 41% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 3.71 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 71% | 53% | 47% | 41% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 5.24 |
| 2 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
17 | 47% | 41% | 29% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.36 |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 71% | 71% | 53% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 5.63 |
| 4 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 53% | 41% | 24% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 65% | 35% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.44 |
| 6 |
BIT |
17 | 53% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 3.94 |
| 7 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 53% | 47% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 3.63 |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 71% | 53% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 76% | 47% | 41% | 41% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 4.75 |
| 10 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 71% | 59% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 4.93 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 94% | 76% | 65% | 41% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.35 |
| 12 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 41% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.27 |
| 13 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 47% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 3.47 |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 88% | 71% | 53% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 5.18 |
| 15 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 82% | 76% | 59% | 41% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 5.19 |
| 16 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 53% | 41% | 35% | 29% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 17 |
Kunshan |
17 | 71% | 53% | 47% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 4.71 |
| 18 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 47% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.27 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hangzhou |
34 | 50% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 3% | 2.82 |
| 2 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
34 | 62% | 47% | 32% | 18% | 15% | 9% | 6% | 4.07 |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka |
34 | 59% | 53% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 3% | 3% | 3.72 |
| 4 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 74% | 62% | 59% | 44% | 32% | 21% | 15% | 5.45 |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 82% | 62% | 56% | 41% | 29% | 26% | 12% | 5.33 |
| 6 |
BIT |
34 | 79% | 79% | 56% | 29% | 18% | 15% | 9% | 5.2 |
| 7 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 65% | 59% | 53% | 47% | 32% | 26% | 15% | 6.07 |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 74% | 47% | 26% | 18% | 9% | 6% | 3% | 3.67 |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 53% | 38% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 3% | 3.55 |
| 10 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 41% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 9% | 3% | 3% | 2.9 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
34 | 35% | 21% | 15% | 9% | 9% | 6% | 0% | 2.58 |
| 12 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 74% | 65% | 47% | 41% | 12% | 3% | 3% | 4.61 |
| 13 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 74% | 62% | 38% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 4.83 |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 74% | 53% | 44% | 29% | 24% | 15% | 9% | 4.45 |
| 15 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
34 | 50% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 3% | 2.84 |
| 16 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 53% | 35% | 26% | 15% | 12% | 9% | 3% | 3.38 |
| 17 |
Kunshan |
34 | 56% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 15% | 15% | 9% | 3.94 |
| 18 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 71% | 68% | 59% | 38% | 29% | 24% | 15% | 6.03 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 41% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.18 |
| 2 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
17 | 65% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 4.07 |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 65% | 65% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 3.75 |
| 4 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 71% | 53% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 4.87 |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 88% | 65% | 65% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 5.82 |
| 6 |
BIT |
17 | 76% | 76% | 65% | 35% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 5.43 |
| 7 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 47% | 47% | 41% | 35% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 5.42 |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 76% | 41% | 35% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.53 |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 59% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 4.13 |
| 10 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 53% | 47% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 3.25 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 2.38 |
| 12 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 71% | 65% | 41% | 35% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 4.19 |
| 13 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 88% | 71% | 41% | 29% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 5.07 |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 71% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 4 |
| 15 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 59% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3 |
| 16 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 71% | 53% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 4.12 |
| 17 |
Kunshan |
17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 3.88 |
| 18 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 65% | 59% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 6.14 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 59% | 41% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 3.47 |
| 2 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
17 | 59% | 47% | 35% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 4.07 |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 53% | 41% | 41% | 24% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 3.69 |
| 4 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 76% | 71% | 71% | 59% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 6 |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 76% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 24% | 24% | 0% | 4.81 |
| 6 |
BIT |
17 | 82% | 82% | 47% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 5 |
| 7 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 82% | 71% | 65% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 6.56 |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 71% | 53% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 3.81 |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 47% | 29% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 10 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 29% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 41% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 2.76 |
| 12 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 76% | 65% | 53% | 47% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 5.07 |
| 13 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 59% | 53% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 4.6 |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 76% | 59% | 59% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 4.88 |
| 15 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 41% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 2.69 |
| 16 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 2.53 |
| 17 |
Kunshan |
17 | 53% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 4 |
| 18 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 76% | 76% | 59% | 29% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 5.93 |
The average number of corners for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Xinjiang Tianshan can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.
Matches involving Heilongjiang Lava Spring have averaged 7.85 corners per match during this China League One campaign. They have taken 4.18 corners per match, while they concede an average of 3.67 to their opponents.
As for their upcoming opponent, Xinjiang Tianshan, their corner stats are the following:
- Average number of corners in matches involving Xinjiang Tianshan: 8.48
- Average number of corners in favour: 3.03
- Average number of corners conceded: 5.45
Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Xinjiang Tianshan. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.
Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.