Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0 - 2 Sichuan Jiuniu
20.06.2022 - 07:30
Finished
Match Scoring / Conceding First
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 76% |
| 2 |
Kunshan |
34 | 76% |
| 3 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 74% |
| 4 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 56% |
| 5 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 56% |
| 6 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 50% |
| 7 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 50% |
| 8 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 47% |
| 9 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 44% |
| 10 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 44% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 41% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 41% |
| 13 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 38% |
| 14 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 38% |
| 15 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 32% |
| 16 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 29% |
| 17 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 21% |
| 18 |
BIT |
34 | 12% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
17 | 71% |
| 2 |
Kunshan |
17 | 71% |
| 3 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 65% |
| 4 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 65% |
| 5 |
Hebei Kungfu |
17 | 59% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 53% |
| 7 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 53% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 47% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 41% |
| 10 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 41% |
| 11 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 41% |
| 12 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 41% |
| 13 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 35% |
| 14 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 35% |
| 15 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 35% |
| 16 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 24% |
| 17 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 24% |
| 18 |
BIT |
17 | 12% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Kunshan |
17 | 82% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 82% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
17 | 82% |
| 4 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 59% |
| 5 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 59% |
| 6 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 59% |
| 7 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 53% |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 53% |
| 9 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 47% |
| 10 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 47% |
| 11 |
Hebei Kungfu |
17 | 41% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 35% |
| 13 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 35% |
| 14 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 29% |
| 15 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 29% |
| 16 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 18% |
| 17 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 18% |
| 18 |
BIT |
17 | 12% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
BIT |
34 | 82% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 76% |
| 3 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 71% |
| 4 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 53% |
| 5 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 50% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 50% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 50% |
| 8 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 50% |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 47% |
| 10 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 47% |
| 11 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 44% |
| 12 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 44% |
| 13 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 41% |
| 14 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 38% |
| 15 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 29% |
| 16 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 21% |
| 17 |
Kunshan |
34 | 18% |
| 18 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 15% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
BIT |
17 | 82% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 76% |
| 3 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 65% |
| 4 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 65% |
| 5 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 59% |
| 6 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 59% |
| 7 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 53% |
| 8 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 53% |
| 9 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 47% |
| 10 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 47% |
| 11 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 41% |
| 12 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 35% |
| 13 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 35% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
17 | 29% |
| 15 |
Hebei Kungfu |
17 | 29% |
| 16 |
Kunshan |
17 | 24% |
| 17 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 24% |
| 18 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 18% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 82% |
| 2 |
BIT |
17 | 82% |
| 3 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 76% |
| 4 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 65% |
| 5 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 59% |
| 6 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 47% |
| 7 |
Hebei Kungfu |
17 | 47% |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 47% |
| 9 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 47% |
| 10 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 41% |
| 11 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 41% |
| 12 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 41% |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 41% |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 35% |
| 15 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 24% |
| 16 |
Kunshan |
17 | 12% |
| 17 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 12% |
| 18 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
17 | 12% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Sichuan Jiuniu in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Heilongjiang Lava Spring has come out and scored the first goal in 44% of the matches they have played so far in the China League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 50% of matches.
Meanwhile, Sichuan Jiuniu comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 56% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 44% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in China League One.