Favourite this Match
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

BTTS: Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Shenzhen Juniors

Sat, 01 November 2025 - 02:30

Shenzhen Juniors Team Logo

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

27 16 59%
2
Nantong Zhiyun Team Logo

Nantong Zhiyun

27 11 41%
3
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

27 13 48%
4
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

27 17 63%
5
Dalian Huayi Team Logo

Dalian Huayi

27 18 67%
6
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

27 10 37%
7
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

26 9 35%
8
Qingdao Red Lions Team Logo

Qingdao Red Lions

27 10 37%
9
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

27 17 63%
10
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

27 15 56%
11
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

27 11 41%
12
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

27 14 52%
13
Chongqing Tongliang Long Team Logo

Chongqing Tongliang Long

26 15 58%
14
Shenzhen Juniors Team Logo

Shenzhen Juniors

27 16 59%
15
Guangzhou E-Power Team Logo

Guangzhou E-Power

27 13 48%
16
Shaanxi Union Team Logo

Shaanxi Union

27 19 70%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

13 9 69%
2
Nantong Zhiyun Team Logo

Nantong Zhiyun

14 5 36%
3
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

13 7 54%
4
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

13 8 62%
5
Dalian Huayi Team Logo

Dalian Huayi

14 10 71%
6
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

14 6 43%
7
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

13 3 23%
8
Qingdao Red Lions Team Logo

Qingdao Red Lions

13 5 38%
9
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

14 9 64%
10
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

13 9 69%
11
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

14 4 29%
12
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

14 8 57%
13
Chongqing Tongliang Long Team Logo

Chongqing Tongliang Long

13 6 46%
14
Shenzhen Juniors Team Logo

Shenzhen Juniors

13 9 69%
15
Guangzhou E-Power Team Logo

Guangzhou E-Power

13 4 31%
16
Shaanxi Union Team Logo

Shaanxi Union

14 10 71%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

14 7 50%
2
Nantong Zhiyun Team Logo

Nantong Zhiyun

13 6 46%
3
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

14 6 43%
4
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

14 9 64%
5
Dalian Huayi Team Logo

Dalian Huayi

13 8 62%
6
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

13 4 31%
7
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

13 6 46%
8
Qingdao Red Lions Team Logo

Qingdao Red Lions

14 5 36%
9
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

13 8 62%
10
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

14 6 43%
11
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

13 7 54%
12
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

13 6 46%
13
Chongqing Tongliang Long Team Logo

Chongqing Tongliang Long

13 9 69%
14
Shenzhen Juniors Team Logo

Shenzhen Juniors

14 7 50%
15
Guangzhou E-Power Team Logo

Guangzhou E-Power

14 9 64%
16
Shaanxi Union Team Logo

Shaanxi Union

13 9 69%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Shenzhen Juniors have both scored and conceded in the same match in the China League One.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 27 matches played in the China League 1, Heilongjiang Lava Spring has scored and conceded goals in 16 matches. In other words, 59% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 69% at home, while it is 50% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Shenzhen Juniors has scored and conceded in 16 of their 27 matches so far in the Chinese Division 1, giving them a BTTS rate of 59%. Both teams have scored in 9 of Shenzhen Juniors’s 13 home matches, and it has happened 7 times in 14 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets