# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
14 | 78% |
2 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
12 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
10 | 56% |
4 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
10 | 56% |
5 |
![]() Nanjing City |
9 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Dongguan United |
9 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
8 | 47% |
8 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
8 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
8 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
7 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
7 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
7 | 41% |
13 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
7 | 39% |
14 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
6 | 35% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
4 | 22% |
16 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
4 | 22% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
8 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
7 | 78% |
3 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
7 | 78% |
4 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
5 | 56% |
6 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
5 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Dongguan United |
5 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
4 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
4 | 44% |
11 |
![]() Nanjing City |
4 | 44% |
12 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
3 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
3 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
2 | 29% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
2 | 25% |
16 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
1 | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
7 | 78% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
6 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
5 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Nanjing City |
5 | 56% |
5 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
4 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
4 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
5 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Dongguan United |
4 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
4 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
3 | 38% |
12 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
3 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
2 | 22% |
14 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
2 | 22% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
2 | 20% |
16 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
14 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
14 | 77% |
3 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
11 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
11 | 61% |
5 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
10 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
10 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
10 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
10 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
10 | 55% |
10 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
9 | 52% |
11 |
![]() Dongguan United |
9 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Nanjing City |
9 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
8 | 44% |
14 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
8 | 44% |
15 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
5 | 29% |
16 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
4 | 22% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
8 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
6 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
5 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
6 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
6 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
5 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Nanjing City |
5 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
4 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
4 | 44% |
11 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
4 | 44% |
12 |
![]() Dongguan United |
4 | 44% |
13 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
4 | 40% |
14 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
2 | 22% |
15 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
2 | 22% |
16 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
2 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
8 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
8 | 80% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
7 | 77% |
4 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
7 | 77% |
5 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
6 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
5 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
6 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Dongguan United |
5 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
5 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
4 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
4 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Nanjing City |
4 | 44% |
14 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
3 | 37% |
15 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
3 | 33% |
16 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
2 | 22% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Hebei Kungfu and Dongguan United in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Hebei Kungfu has come out and scored the first goal in 56% of the matches they have played so far in the China League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 44% of matches.
Meanwhile, Dongguan United comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 50% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 50% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in China League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.