Favourite this Match

Hebei CFFC 0 - 0 Guizhou Zhicheng

20.06.2015 - 07:30

Stadium: Langfang City Sports Center

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Yanbian Funde Team Logo

Yanbian Funde

30 14 47%
2
Hebei CFFC Team Logo

Hebei CFFC

30 14 47%
3
Zhejiang Yiteng Team Logo

Zhejiang Yiteng

30 20 67%
4
Dalian Yifang Team Logo

Dalian Yifang

30 9 30%
5
Guizhou Zhicheng Team Logo

Guizhou Zhicheng

30 19 63%
6
Tianjin Quanjian Team Logo

Tianjin Quanjian

30 13 43%
7
Shenzhen Team Logo

Shenzhen

30 23 77%
8
Wuhan Zall Team Logo

Wuhan Zall

30 15 50%
9
Xinjiang Tianshan Team Logo

Xinjiang Tianshan

30 21 70%
10
Beijing BG Team Logo

Beijing BG

30 10 33%
11
Nei Mongol Zhongyou Team Logo

Nei Mongol Zhongyou

30 12 40%
12
Qingdao Huanghai Team Logo

Qingdao Huanghai

30 14 47%
13
Hunan Xiangtao Team Logo

Hunan Xiangtao

30 17 57%
14
Qingdao Jonoon Team Logo

Qingdao Jonoon

30 15 50%
15
BIT Team Logo

BIT

30 20 67%
16
Jiangxi Liansheng Team Logo

Jiangxi Liansheng

30 18 60%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Yanbian Funde Team Logo

Yanbian Funde

15 6 40%
2
Hebei CFFC Team Logo

Hebei CFFC

15 5 33%
3
Zhejiang Yiteng Team Logo

Zhejiang Yiteng

15 9 60%
4
Dalian Yifang Team Logo

Dalian Yifang

15 4 27%
5
Guizhou Zhicheng Team Logo

Guizhou Zhicheng

15 10 67%
6
Tianjin Quanjian Team Logo

Tianjin Quanjian

15 8 53%
7
Shenzhen Team Logo

Shenzhen

15 13 87%
8
Wuhan Zall Team Logo

Wuhan Zall

15 8 53%
9
Xinjiang Tianshan Team Logo

Xinjiang Tianshan

15 11 73%
10
Beijing BG Team Logo

Beijing BG

15 5 33%
11
Nei Mongol Zhongyou Team Logo

Nei Mongol Zhongyou

15 6 40%
12
Qingdao Huanghai Team Logo

Qingdao Huanghai

15 7 47%
13
Hunan Xiangtao Team Logo

Hunan Xiangtao

15 8 53%
14
Qingdao Jonoon Team Logo

Qingdao Jonoon

15 6 40%
15
BIT Team Logo

BIT

15 10 67%
16
Jiangxi Liansheng Team Logo

Jiangxi Liansheng

15 11 73%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Yanbian Funde Team Logo

Yanbian Funde

15 8 53%
2
Hebei CFFC Team Logo

Hebei CFFC

15 9 60%
3
Zhejiang Yiteng Team Logo

Zhejiang Yiteng

15 11 73%
4
Dalian Yifang Team Logo

Dalian Yifang

15 5 33%
5
Guizhou Zhicheng Team Logo

Guizhou Zhicheng

15 9 60%
6
Tianjin Quanjian Team Logo

Tianjin Quanjian

15 5 33%
7
Shenzhen Team Logo

Shenzhen

15 10 67%
8
Wuhan Zall Team Logo

Wuhan Zall

15 7 47%
9
Xinjiang Tianshan Team Logo

Xinjiang Tianshan

15 10 67%
10
Beijing BG Team Logo

Beijing BG

15 5 33%
11
Nei Mongol Zhongyou Team Logo

Nei Mongol Zhongyou

15 6 40%
12
Qingdao Huanghai Team Logo

Qingdao Huanghai

15 7 47%
13
Hunan Xiangtao Team Logo

Hunan Xiangtao

15 9 60%
14
Qingdao Jonoon Team Logo

Qingdao Jonoon

15 9 60%
15
BIT Team Logo

BIT

15 10 67%
16
Jiangxi Liansheng Team Logo

Jiangxi Liansheng

15 7 47%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Hebei CFFC and Guizhou Zhicheng have both scored and conceded in the same match in the China League One.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 30 matches played in the China League One, Hebei CFFC has scored and conceded goals in 14 matches. In other words, 47% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 33% at home, while it is 60% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Guizhou Zhicheng has scored and conceded in 19 of their 30 matches so far in the China League One, giving them a BTTS rate of 63%. Both teams have scored in 10 of Guizhou Zhicheng’s 15 home matches, and it has happened 9 times in 15 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets