# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Fleetwood Town |
46 | 27 | 59% |
2 |
![]() Cambridge United |
46 | 21 | 46% |
3 |
![]() Newport County |
46 | 23 | 50% |
4 |
![]() Mansfield Town |
48 | 28 | 58% |
5 |
![]() Luton Town |
49 | 24 | 49% |
6 |
![]() Grimsby Town |
46 | 28 | 61% |
7 |
![]() York City |
49 | 28 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Forest Green Rovers |
46 | 25 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Lincoln City |
46 | 22 | 48% |
10 |
![]() Ebbsfleet United |
46 | 30 | 65% |
11 |
![]() Gateshead |
46 | 29 | 63% |
12 |
![]() Barrow |
46 | 27 | 59% |
13 |
![]() Wrexham |
48 | 19 | 40% |
14 |
![]() Southport |
46 | 27 | 59% |
15 |
![]() Braintree Town |
46 | 30 | 65% |
16 |
![]() Kidderminster Harriers |
46 | 31 | 67% |
17 |
![]() Alfreton Town |
46 | 27 | 59% |
18 |
![]() AFC Telford United |
46 | 25 | 54% |
19 |
![]() Tamworth |
46 | 23 | 50% |
20 |
![]() Bath City |
46 | 24 | 52% |
21 |
![]() Stockport County |
46 | 26 | 57% |
22 |
![]() Hayes & Yeading United |
46 | 30 | 65% |
23 |
![]() Kettering Town |
46 | 24 | 52% |
24 |
![]() Darlington |
46 | 20 | 43% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Fleetwood Town |
23 | 14 | 61% |
2 |
![]() Cambridge United |
23 | 9 | 39% |
3 |
![]() Newport County |
23 | 7 | 30% |
4 |
![]() Mansfield Town |
24 | 16 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Luton Town |
25 | 11 | 44% |
6 |
![]() Grimsby Town |
23 | 13 | 57% |
7 |
![]() York City |
24 | 13 | 54% |
8 |
![]() Forest Green Rovers |
23 | 14 | 61% |
9 |
![]() Lincoln City |
23 | 10 | 43% |
10 |
![]() Ebbsfleet United |
23 | 16 | 70% |
11 |
![]() Gateshead |
23 | 13 | 57% |
12 |
![]() Barrow |
23 | 13 | 57% |
13 |
![]() Wrexham |
24 | 10 | 42% |
14 |
![]() Southport |
23 | 16 | 70% |
15 |
![]() Braintree Town |
23 | 15 | 65% |
16 |
![]() Kidderminster Harriers |
23 | 16 | 70% |
17 |
![]() Alfreton Town |
23 | 17 | 74% |
18 |
![]() AFC Telford United |
23 | 11 | 48% |
19 |
![]() Tamworth |
23 | 14 | 61% |
20 |
![]() Bath City |
23 | 13 | 57% |
21 |
![]() Stockport County |
23 | 11 | 48% |
22 |
![]() Hayes & Yeading United |
23 | 15 | 65% |
23 |
![]() Kettering Town |
23 | 14 | 61% |
24 |
![]() Darlington |
23 | 8 | 35% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Fleetwood Town |
23 | 13 | 57% |
2 |
![]() Cambridge United |
23 | 12 | 52% |
3 |
![]() Newport County |
23 | 16 | 70% |
4 |
![]() Mansfield Town |
24 | 12 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Luton Town |
24 | 13 | 54% |
6 |
![]() Grimsby Town |
23 | 15 | 65% |
7 |
![]() York City |
25 | 15 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Forest Green Rovers |
23 | 11 | 48% |
9 |
![]() Lincoln City |
23 | 12 | 52% |
10 |
![]() Ebbsfleet United |
23 | 14 | 61% |
11 |
![]() Gateshead |
23 | 16 | 70% |
12 |
![]() Barrow |
23 | 14 | 61% |
13 |
![]() Wrexham |
24 | 9 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Southport |
23 | 11 | 48% |
15 |
![]() Braintree Town |
23 | 15 | 65% |
16 |
![]() Kidderminster Harriers |
23 | 15 | 65% |
17 |
![]() Alfreton Town |
23 | 10 | 43% |
18 |
![]() AFC Telford United |
23 | 14 | 61% |
19 |
![]() Tamworth |
23 | 9 | 39% |
20 |
![]() Bath City |
23 | 11 | 48% |
21 |
![]() Stockport County |
23 | 15 | 65% |
22 |
![]() Hayes & Yeading United |
23 | 15 | 65% |
23 |
![]() Kettering Town |
23 | 10 | 43% |
24 |
![]() Darlington |
23 | 12 | 52% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Hayes & Yeading United and Wrexham have both scored and conceded in the same match in the National League.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.