Favourite this Match

Guizhou Zhicheng 2 - 2 Shenzhen

30.08.2013 - 04:00

Stadium: Guiyang Olympic Sports Center

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Yanbian Funde Team Logo

Yanbian Funde

30 15 50%
2
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright Team Logo

Shijiazhuang Ever Bright

30 10 33%
3
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

30 14 47%
4
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan Team Logo

Chongqing Dangdai Lifan

30 15 50%
5
Zhejiang Yiteng Team Logo

Zhejiang Yiteng

30 15 50%
6
Guizhou Zhicheng Team Logo

Guizhou Zhicheng

30 17 57%
7
Tianjin Quanjian Team Logo

Tianjin Quanjian

30 17 57%
8
Shenzhen Team Logo

Shenzhen

30 19 63%
9
Xinjiang Tianshan Team Logo

Xinjiang Tianshan

30 12 40%
10
Beijing BG Team Logo

Beijing BG

30 17 57%
11
Hunan Xiangtao Team Logo

Hunan Xiangtao

30 13 43%
12
BIT Team Logo

BIT

30 13 43%
13
Shenyang Zhongze Team Logo

Shenyang Zhongze

30 16 53%
14
Chongqing Team Logo

Chongqing

30 15 50%
15
Chengdu Tiancheng Team Logo

Chengdu Tiancheng

30 11 37%
16
Shaanxi Wuzhou Team Logo

Shaanxi Wuzhou

30 13 43%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Yanbian Funde Team Logo

Yanbian Funde

15 5 33%
2
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright Team Logo

Shijiazhuang Ever Bright

15 8 53%
3
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

15 6 40%
4
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan Team Logo

Chongqing Dangdai Lifan

15 7 47%
5
Zhejiang Yiteng Team Logo

Zhejiang Yiteng

15 8 53%
6
Guizhou Zhicheng Team Logo

Guizhou Zhicheng

15 10 67%
7
Tianjin Quanjian Team Logo

Tianjin Quanjian

15 8 53%
8
Shenzhen Team Logo

Shenzhen

15 10 67%
9
Xinjiang Tianshan Team Logo

Xinjiang Tianshan

15 7 47%
10
Beijing BG Team Logo

Beijing BG

15 9 60%
11
Hunan Xiangtao Team Logo

Hunan Xiangtao

15 8 53%
12
BIT Team Logo

BIT

15 4 27%
13
Shenyang Zhongze Team Logo

Shenyang Zhongze

15 6 40%
14
Chongqing Team Logo

Chongqing

15 8 53%
15
Chengdu Tiancheng Team Logo

Chengdu Tiancheng

15 3 20%
16
Shaanxi Wuzhou Team Logo

Shaanxi Wuzhou

15 9 60%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Yanbian Funde Team Logo

Yanbian Funde

15 10 67%
2
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright Team Logo

Shijiazhuang Ever Bright

15 2 13%
3
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

15 8 53%
4
Chongqing Dangdai Lifan Team Logo

Chongqing Dangdai Lifan

15 8 53%
5
Zhejiang Yiteng Team Logo

Zhejiang Yiteng

15 7 47%
6
Guizhou Zhicheng Team Logo

Guizhou Zhicheng

15 7 47%
7
Tianjin Quanjian Team Logo

Tianjin Quanjian

15 9 60%
8
Shenzhen Team Logo

Shenzhen

15 9 60%
9
Xinjiang Tianshan Team Logo

Xinjiang Tianshan

15 5 33%
10
Beijing BG Team Logo

Beijing BG

15 8 53%
11
Hunan Xiangtao Team Logo

Hunan Xiangtao

15 5 33%
12
BIT Team Logo

BIT

15 9 60%
13
Shenyang Zhongze Team Logo

Shenyang Zhongze

15 10 67%
14
Chongqing Team Logo

Chongqing

15 7 47%
15
Chengdu Tiancheng Team Logo

Chengdu Tiancheng

15 8 53%
16
Shaanxi Wuzhou Team Logo

Shaanxi Wuzhou

15 4 27%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Guizhou Zhicheng and Shenzhen have both scored and conceded in the same match in the China League One.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 30 matches played in the China League One, Guizhou Zhicheng has scored and conceded goals in 17 matches. In other words, 57% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 67% at home, while it is 47% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Shenzhen has scored and conceded in 19 of their 30 matches so far in the China League One, giving them a BTTS rate of 63%. Both teams have scored in 10 of Shenzhen’s 15 home matches, and it has happened 9 times in 15 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets