BTTS: Guangzhou E-Power 0 - 1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Sun, 27 July 2025 - 07:30
Stadium: Yuexiushan Stadium
Finished
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
25 | 15 | 60% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
25 | 10 | 40% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
24 | 11 | 46% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
24 | 16 | 67% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
25 | 16 | 64% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
24 | 8 | 33% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
23 | 8 | 35% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
25 | 9 | 36% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
24 | 15 | 63% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
25 | 14 | 56% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
25 | 9 | 36% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
24 | 12 | 50% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
23 | 13 | 57% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
24 | 15 | 63% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
24 | 12 | 50% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
24 | 17 | 71% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
13 | 5 | 38% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
13 | 6 | 46% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
11 | 2 | 18% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
12 | 4 | 33% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
13 | 9 | 69% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
13 | 3 | 23% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
11 | 3 | 27% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
12 | 9 | 75% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
13 | 7 | 54% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
12 | 5 | 42% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
12 | 5 | 42% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
13 | 8 | 62% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
11 | 2 | 18% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
13 | 5 | 38% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
12 | 5 | 42% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
12 | 5 | 42% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
11 | 7 | 64% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
13 | 9 | 69% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
12 | 8 | 67% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Guangzhou E-Power and Heilongjiang Lava Spring have both scored and conceded in the same match in the China League One.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 24 matches played in the China League One, Guangzhou E-Power has scored and conceded goals in 12 matches. In other words, 50% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 27% at home, while it is 69% away from home.
- Meanwhile, Heilongjiang Lava Spring has scored and conceded in 15 of their 25 matches so far in the China League One, giving them a BTTS rate of 60%. Both teams have scored in 8 of Heilongjiang Lava Spring’s 12 home matches, and it has happened 7 times in 13 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets