Favourite this Match

Guangzhou E-Power 1 - 5 Chongqing Tongliang Long

10.05.2025 - 07:30

Stadium: Yuexiushan Stadium

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

20 12 60%
2
Nantong Zhiyun Team Logo

Nantong Zhiyun

21 8 38%
3
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

21 9 43%
4
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

21 14 67%
5
Dalian Huayi Team Logo

Dalian Huayi

20 12 60%
6
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

21 7 33%
7
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

20 8 40%
8
Qingdao Red Lions Team Logo

Qingdao Red Lions

21 8 38%
9
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

21 14 67%
10
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

21 12 57%
11
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

21 8 38%
12
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

21 12 57%
13
Chongqing Tongliang Long Team Logo

Chongqing Tongliang Long

20 12 60%
14
Shenzhen Juniors Team Logo

Shenzhen Juniors

21 14 67%
15
Guangzhou E-Power Team Logo

Guangzhou E-Power

21 11 52%
16
Shaanxi Union Team Logo

Shaanxi Union

21 15 71%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

10 6 60%
2
Nantong Zhiyun Team Logo

Nantong Zhiyun

10 3 30%
3
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

11 5 45%
4
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

11 8 73%
5
Dalian Huayi Team Logo

Dalian Huayi

10 6 60%
6
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

11 5 45%
7
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

9 2 22%
8
Qingdao Red Lions Team Logo

Qingdao Red Lions

10 4 40%
9
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

10 7 70%
10
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

11 8 73%
11
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

11 3 27%
12
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

11 7 64%
13
Chongqing Tongliang Long Team Logo

Chongqing Tongliang Long

11 6 55%
14
Shenzhen Juniors Team Logo

Shenzhen Juniors

10 7 70%
15
Guangzhou E-Power Team Logo

Guangzhou E-Power

10 3 30%
16
Shaanxi Union Team Logo

Shaanxi Union

10 8 80%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

10 6 60%
2
Nantong Zhiyun Team Logo

Nantong Zhiyun

11 5 45%
3
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

10 4 40%
4
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

10 6 60%
5
Dalian Huayi Team Logo

Dalian Huayi

10 6 60%
6
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

10 2 20%
7
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

11 6 55%
8
Qingdao Red Lions Team Logo

Qingdao Red Lions

11 4 36%
9
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

11 7 64%
10
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

10 4 40%
11
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

10 5 50%
12
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

10 5 50%
13
Chongqing Tongliang Long Team Logo

Chongqing Tongliang Long

9 6 67%
14
Shenzhen Juniors Team Logo

Shenzhen Juniors

11 7 64%
15
Guangzhou E-Power Team Logo

Guangzhou E-Power

11 8 73%
16
Shaanxi Union Team Logo

Shaanxi Union

11 7 64%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Guangzhou E-Power and Chongqing Tongliang Long have both scored and conceded in the same match in the China League One.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 21 matches played in the China League One, Guangzhou E-Power has scored and conceded goals in 11 matches. In other words, 52% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 30% at home, while it is 73% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Chongqing Tongliang Long has scored and conceded in 12 of their 20 matches so far in the China League One, giving them a BTTS rate of 60%. Both teams have scored in 6 of Chongqing Tongliang Long’s 11 home matches, and it has happened 6 times in 9 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets