# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
17 | 63% |
2 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
16 | 59% |
3 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 54% |
4 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
15 | 54% |
5 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
14 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Union Omaha |
14 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Naples |
14 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Westchester SC |
14 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Texoma |
13 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
11 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Forward Madison |
11 | 39% |
12 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
10 | 37% |
13 |
![]() AV Alta |
10 | 36% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
10 | 36% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
11 | 92% |
2 |
![]() Texoma |
10 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
9 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Union Omaha |
8 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
8 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Naples |
7 | 54% |
7 |
![]() Forward Madison |
8 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
8 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Westchester SC |
8 | 53% |
10 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
7 | 50% |
11 |
![]() AV Alta |
7 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
6 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
6 | 43% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
8 | 67% |
2 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
8 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
8 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Naples |
7 | 47% |
5 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 46% |
6 |
![]() One Knoxville |
6 | 40% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
6 | 40% |
8 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
5 | 36% |
9 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
4 | 29% |
10 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
4 | 27% |
11 |
![]() Texoma |
3 | 23% |
12 |
![]() Forward Madison |
3 | 23% |
13 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
3 | 23% |
14 |
![]() AV Alta |
3 | 21% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
18 | 64% |
2 |
![]() AV Alta |
18 | 64% |
3 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
17 | 62% |
4 |
![]() Forward Madison |
17 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
16 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Texoma |
15 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Westchester SC |
14 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
14 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Naples |
14 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
14 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
13 | 46% |
12 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
13 | 46% |
13 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
11 | 40% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
10 | 37% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
8 | 57% |
2 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
7 | 50% |
3 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
7 | 50% |
4 |
![]() AV Alta |
7 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
6 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 46% |
7 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 46% |
8 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
7 | 46% |
9 |
![]() Westchester SC |
7 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
6 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 38% |
12 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
5 | 35% |
13 |
![]() Texoma |
5 | 33% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
1 | 8% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() AV Alta |
11 | 78% |
2 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
10 | 76% |
3 |
![]() Forward Madison |
10 | 76% |
4 |
![]() Texoma |
10 | 76% |
5 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
11 | 73% |
6 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
10 | 71% |
7 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
9 | 64% |
8 |
![]() One Knoxville |
9 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Union Omaha |
9 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Westchester SC |
7 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Naples |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
6 | 42% |
13 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 42% |
14 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 33% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Greenville Triumph and Union Omaha in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Greenville Triumph has come out and scored the first goal in 36% of the matches they have played so far in the USL League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 64% of matches.
Meanwhile, Union Omaha comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 50% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 50% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.