# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Westchester SC |
7 | 70% |
2 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
8 | 67% |
3 |
![]() One Knoxville |
5 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
7 | 58% |
5 |
![]() Naples |
7 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Texoma |
5 | 45% |
7 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
5 | 42% |
8 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
4 | 40% |
9 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
4 | 40% |
10 |
![]() Union Omaha |
4 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 33% |
12 |
![]() Alta |
3 | 30% |
13 |
![]() Forward Madison |
2 | 20% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
2 | 17% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Westchester SC |
5 | 100% |
2 |
![]() One Knoxville |
1 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
5 | 83% |
4 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
4 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Texoma |
4 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Union Omaha |
1 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Naples |
3 | 43% |
9 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
1 | 33% |
10 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
2 | 29% |
11 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
2 | 29% |
12 |
![]() Forward Madison |
1 | 25% |
13 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
1 | 20% |
14 |
![]() Alta |
1 | 17% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Naples |
4 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
3 | 75% |
3 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
2 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
3 | 60% |
5 |
![]() One Knoxville |
4 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
3 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Alta |
2 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Westchester SC |
2 | 40% |
9 |
![]() Union Omaha |
3 | 38% |
10 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
2 | 33% |
11 |
![]() Texoma |
1 | 25% |
12 |
![]() Forward Madison |
1 | 17% |
13 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
1 | 17% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
10 | 83% |
2 |
![]() Forward Madison |
8 | 80% |
3 |
![]() Alta |
7 | 70% |
4 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
6 | 66% |
5 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
6 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
6 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
7 | 58% |
9 |
![]() Texoma |
6 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
5 | 41% |
12 |
![]() One Knoxville |
3 | 37% |
13 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
4 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Westchester SC |
3 | 30% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Alta |
5 | 83% |
2 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
4 | 80% |
3 |
![]() Forward Madison |
3 | 75% |
4 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
5 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
5 | 71% |
6 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
2 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Naples |
4 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Union Omaha |
1 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Texoma |
3 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
2 | 33% |
12 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
1 | 16% |
13 |
![]() Westchester SC |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
5 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Forward Madison |
5 | 83% |
3 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
5 | 83% |
4 |
![]() Texoma |
3 | 75% |
5 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
4 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Westchester SC |
3 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
3 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Alta |
2 | 50% |
10 |
![]() One Knoxville |
3 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
2 | 40% |
12 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
1 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
1 | 25% |
14 |
![]() Naples |
1 | 20% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Forward Madison and Texoma in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Forward Madison has come out and scored the first goal in 20% of the matches they have played so far in the USL League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 80% of matches.
Meanwhile, Texoma comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 45% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 54% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.