# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Charlton Athletic |
46 | 28 | 61% |
2 |
![]() Fleetwood Town |
46 | 26 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Bristol Rovers |
46 | 26 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Oxford United |
46 | 25 | 54% |
5 |
![]() Morecambe |
46 | 25 | 54% |
6 |
![]() Plymouth Argyle |
46 | 24 | 52% |
7 |
![]() Exeter City |
46 | 24 | 52% |
8 |
![]() Portsmouth |
46 | 24 | 52% |
9 |
![]() Burton Albion |
46 | 23 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Forest Green Rovers |
46 | 23 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Derby County |
46 | 22 | 48% |
12 |
![]() Port Vale |
46 | 22 | 48% |
13 |
![]() Barnsley |
49 | 21 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Ipswich Town |
46 | 21 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Shrewsbury Town |
46 | 21 | 46% |
16 |
![]() Cambridge United |
46 | 21 | 46% |
17 |
![]() Sheffield Wednesday |
49 | 20 | 41% |
18 |
![]() Milton Keynes Dons |
46 | 20 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Peterborough United |
48 | 20 | 42% |
20 |
![]() Lincoln City |
46 | 20 | 43% |
21 |
![]() Accrington Stanley |
46 | 19 | 41% |
22 |
![]() Bolton Wanderers |
48 | 18 | 38% |
23 |
![]() Wycombe Wanderers |
46 | 18 | 39% |
24 |
![]() Cheltenham Town |
46 | 17 | 37% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Charlton Athletic |
23 | 16 | 70% |
2 |
![]() Oxford United |
23 | 15 | 65% |
3 |
![]() Fleetwood Town |
23 | 13 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Bristol Rovers |
23 | 13 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Morecambe |
23 | 13 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Portsmouth |
23 | 13 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Shrewsbury Town |
23 | 12 | 52% |
8 |
![]() Exeter City |
23 | 12 | 52% |
9 |
![]() Derby County |
23 | 11 | 48% |
10 |
![]() Milton Keynes Dons |
23 | 11 | 48% |
11 |
![]() Accrington Stanley |
23 | 11 | 48% |
12 |
![]() Lincoln City |
23 | 11 | 48% |
13 |
![]() Burton Albion |
23 | 10 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Sheffield Wednesday |
24 | 10 | 42% |
15 |
![]() Port Vale |
23 | 10 | 43% |
16 |
![]() Cheltenham Town |
23 | 10 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Cambridge United |
23 | 10 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Plymouth Argyle |
23 | 10 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Wycombe Wanderers |
23 | 10 | 43% |
20 |
![]() Forest Green Rovers |
23 | 10 | 43% |
21 |
![]() Barnsley |
25 | 9 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Ipswich Town |
23 | 9 | 39% |
23 |
![]() Peterborough United |
24 | 8 | 33% |
24 |
![]() Bolton Wanderers |
24 | 7 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Plymouth Argyle |
23 | 14 | 61% |
2 |
![]() Burton Albion |
23 | 13 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Fleetwood Town |
23 | 13 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Bristol Rovers |
23 | 13 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Forest Green Rovers |
23 | 13 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Barnsley |
24 | 12 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Ipswich Town |
23 | 12 | 52% |
8 |
![]() Charlton Athletic |
23 | 12 | 52% |
9 |
![]() Port Vale |
23 | 12 | 52% |
10 |
![]() Peterborough United |
24 | 12 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Exeter City |
23 | 12 | 52% |
12 |
![]() Morecambe |
23 | 12 | 52% |
13 |
![]() Derby County |
23 | 11 | 48% |
14 |
![]() Bolton Wanderers |
24 | 11 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Cambridge United |
23 | 11 | 48% |
16 |
![]() Portsmouth |
23 | 11 | 48% |
17 |
![]() Sheffield Wednesday |
25 | 10 | 40% |
18 |
![]() Oxford United |
23 | 10 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Milton Keynes Dons |
23 | 9 | 39% |
20 |
![]() Shrewsbury Town |
23 | 9 | 39% |
21 |
![]() Lincoln City |
23 | 9 | 39% |
22 |
![]() Accrington Stanley |
23 | 8 | 35% |
23 |
![]() Wycombe Wanderers |
23 | 8 | 35% |
24 |
![]() Cheltenham Town |
23 | 7 | 30% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Forest Green Rovers and Fleetwood Town have both scored and conceded in the same match in the EFL League One.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.