Fluminense PI 3 - 1 Castanhal
02.07.2022 - 15:00
Finished
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Nova Iguaçu |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Aimoré |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Bahia de Feira |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Afogados |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Humaitá |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
CEOV Operário |
16 | 13% | 13% | 6% |
| 7 |
Castanhal |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Retrô |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
CSE |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Amazonas |
22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Juventude MA |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
São Paulo Crystal |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Azuriz |
16 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
| 14 |
Pérolas Negras |
14 | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| 15 |
Acao Cuiaba |
14 | 21% | 21% | 7% |
| 16 |
Fluminense PI |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Nova Venécia |
18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Caldense |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 19 |
Globo |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 |
Rio Branco-AC |
18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 21 |
Portuguesa-RJ |
20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| 22 |
Ceilândia |
14 | 14% | 7% | 7% |
| 23 |
Porto Velho |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 |
Costa Rica |
16 | 19% | 13% | 6% |
| 25 |
Crato |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 26 |
Pacajus |
16 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 27 |
Pouso Alegre |
24 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 28 |
Sergipe |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 29 |
São Raimundo RR |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 |
Anápolis |
16 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 31 |
Trem |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 |
Juazeirense |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 33 |
Sousa |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 34 |
URT |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 35 |
América RN |
24 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 36 |
ASA |
20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| 37 |
Moto Club MA |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 38 |
Caxias |
20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| 39 |
Brasiliense |
16 | 25% | 6% | 6% |
| 40 |
FC Cascavel |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 |
Grêmio Anápolis |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 42 |
Ferroviária |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 43 |
Santo André |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 44 |
Noroeste |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 45 |
Inter de Limeira |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 46 |
Cianorte |
14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
| 47 |
Iporá |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 48 |
4 de Julho |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 49 |
Santa Cruz |
18 | 11% | 6% | 6% |
| 50 |
Paraná |
18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Inter de Limeira |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Cianorte |
14 | 14% | 7% | 0% |
| 3 |
Iporá |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
4 de Julho |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Nova Iguaçu |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Aimoré |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Nova Venécia |
18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Sousa |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
URT |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
São Bernardo |
22 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
| 11 |
Tocantinópolis |
20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Náutico RR |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Jacuipense |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 |
Ferroviária |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 15 |
Santo André |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Noroeste |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Bahia de Feira |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Lagarto |
18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 |
EC São Luiz |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 |
São Raimundo AM |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 |
Tuna Luso |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 |
Marcílio Dias |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 23 |
Atlético Alagoinhas |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 |
Próspera Criciuma |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 |
Juventus SC |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 26 |
CSE |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 27 |
Amazonas |
22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 28 |
Juventude MA |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 29 |
São Paulo Crystal |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 |
Pouso Alegre |
24 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 31 |
Azuriz |
16 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 |
Caxias |
20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| 33 |
Pérolas Negras |
14 | 29% | 21% | 7% |
| 34 |
Acao Cuiaba |
14 | 21% | 7% | 7% |
| 35 |
Fluminense PI |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 36 |
Santa Cruz |
18 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
| 37 |
Paraná |
18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 38 |
Icasa |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 39 |
Oeste |
16 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
| 40 |
América RN |
24 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
| 41 |
ASA |
20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| 42 |
Moto Club MA |
18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 43 |
Brasiliense |
16 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
| 44 |
Rio Branco-AC |
18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 45 |
Portuguesa-RJ |
20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
| 46 |
Ceilândia |
14 | 14% | 7% | 0% |
| 47 |
Caldense |
14 | 14% | 0% | 0% |
| 48 |
Globo |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 49 |
Sergipe |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 50 |
São Raimundo RR |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Santa Cruz |
18 | 11% | 11% | 11% |
| 2 |
Paraná |
18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 3 |
Icasa |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Oeste |
16 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
América RN |
24 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
ASA |
20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
| 7 |
Moto Club MA |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Caxias |
20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| 9 |
Brasiliense |
16 | 25% | 6% | 6% |
| 10 |
Rio Branco-AC |
18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 11 |
Portuguesa-RJ |
20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
| 12 |
Ceilândia |
14 | 14% | 7% | 0% |
| 13 |
Caldense |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 14 |
Globo |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
Sergipe |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
São Raimundo RR |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Anápolis |
16 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 18 |
Trem |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 |
Juazeirense |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 |
Sousa |
16 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 |
URT |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 |
São Bernardo |
22 | 5% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 |
Tocantinópolis |
20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 |
Náutico RR |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 25 |
Jacuipense |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 26 |
Ferroviária |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 27 |
Santo André |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 28 |
Noroeste |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 29 |
Inter de Limeira |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 30 |
Cianorte |
14 | 14% | 14% | 0% |
| 31 |
Iporá |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 32 |
4 de Julho |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 33 |
Nova Iguaçu |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 34 |
Aimoré |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 35 |
Bahia de Feira |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 36 |
Lagarto |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 37 |
EC São Luiz |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 38 |
São Raimundo AM |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 39 |
Tuna Luso |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 40 |
Marcílio Dias |
14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 41 |
Atlético Alagoinhas |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 42 |
Próspera Criciuma |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 43 |
Juventus SC |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 44 |
FC Cascavel |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 45 |
Grêmio Anápolis |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 46 |
Afogados |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 47 |
Humaitá |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 48 |
CEOV Operário |
16 | 13% | 6% | 0% |
| 49 |
Castanhal |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
| 50 |
Porto Velho |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Fluminense PI vs Castanhal here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- Fluminense PI has played 14 matches in the Serie D and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 0% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 0% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 0% of matches.
- Meanwhile, Castanhal has, in 14 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 0% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 0% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 0% of matches.
Card statistics for Fluminense PI vs Castanhal bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Serie D, just check out the table above.