# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
17 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
14 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
14 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
12 | 55% |
5 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
11 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Nanjing City |
11 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
11 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Dongguan United |
10 | 45% |
9 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
9 | 41% |
10 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
9 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
8 | 38% |
12 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
8 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
8 | 36% |
14 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
8 | 36% |
15 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
7 | 32% |
16 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
5 | 23% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
9 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
8 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
8 | 73% |
4 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
7 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
6 | 55% |
6 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
6 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
5 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Dongguan United |
5 | 45% |
9 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
5 | 45% |
10 |
![]() Nanjing City |
5 | 45% |
11 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
4 | 36% |
12 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
4 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
3 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
3 | 27% |
16 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
3 | 27% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
9 | 82% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
8 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
7 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Nanjing City |
6 | 55% |
6 |
![]() Dongguan United |
5 | 45% |
7 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
5 | 45% |
8 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
5 | 45% |
9 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
5 | 45% |
10 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
5 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
4 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
4 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
2 | 18% |
15 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
2 | 18% |
16 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
17 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
15 | 68% |
3 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
14 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
14 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
14 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
13 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
13 | 59% |
8 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
13 | 59% |
9 |
![]() Dongguan United |
12 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
11 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Nanjing City |
11 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
11 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
10 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
8 | 36% |
15 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
7 | 33% |
16 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
5 | 22% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
8 | 72% |
2 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
8 | 72% |
3 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
8 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
6 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
7 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
7 | 63% |
7 |
![]() Nanjing City |
6 | 54% |
8 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
6 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Dongguan United |
6 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
5 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
5 | 45% |
12 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
5 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
4 | 36% |
14 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
3 | 27% |
15 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
3 | 27% |
16 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
3 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
10 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
9 | 81% |
3 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
9 | 81% |
4 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
8 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
7 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
6 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
7 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
6 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
6 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
6 | 54% |
11 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
6 | 54% |
12 |
![]() Nanjing City |
5 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
4 | 40% |
14 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 36% |
15 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
3 | 27% |
16 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
2 | 18% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Dalian Huayi and Suzhou Dongwu in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Dalian Huayi has come out and scored the first goal in 36% of the matches they have played so far in the China League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 63% of matches.
Meanwhile, Suzhou Dongwu comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 38% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 61% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in China League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.