# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Avaí |
31 | 16 | 52% |
2 |
![]() Athletico-PR |
31 | 20 | 65% |
3 |
![]() Chapecoense |
31 | 14 | 45% |
4 |
![]() Coritiba |
31 | 9 | 29% |
5 |
![]() Atlético Goianiense |
31 | 15 | 48% |
6 |
![]() América Mineiro |
31 | 15 | 48% |
7 |
![]() Vila Nova |
31 | 14 | 45% |
8 |
![]() Paysandu |
31 | 14 | 45% |
9 |
![]() Criciúma |
31 | 15 | 48% |
10 |
![]() CRB |
31 | 12 | 39% |
11 |
![]() Goiás |
31 | 15 | 48% |
12 |
![]() Volta Redonda |
31 | 10 | 32% |
13 |
![]() Cuiabá |
31 | 16 | 52% |
14 |
![]() Remo |
31 | 18 | 58% |
15 |
![]() Botafogo SP |
31 | 12 | 39% |
16 |
![]() Operário PR |
31 | 15 | 48% |
17 |
![]() Novorizontino |
31 | 14 | 45% |
18 |
![]() Ferroviária |
31 | 20 | 65% |
19 |
![]() Athletic Club |
31 | 15 | 48% |
20 |
![]() Amazonas |
31 | 19 | 61% |
21 |
![]() Criciúma EC |
1 | 0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Avaí |
16 | 7 | 44% |
2 |
![]() Athletico-PR |
15 | 8 | 53% |
3 |
![]() Chapecoense |
15 | 10 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Coritiba |
16 | 4 | 25% |
5 |
![]() Atlético Goianiense |
16 | 7 | 44% |
6 |
![]() América Mineiro |
16 | 9 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Vila Nova |
15 | 6 | 40% |
8 |
![]() Paysandu |
15 | 8 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Criciúma |
15 | 7 | 47% |
10 |
![]() CRB |
15 | 3 | 20% |
11 |
![]() Goiás |
16 | 9 | 56% |
12 |
![]() Volta Redonda |
15 | 5 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Cuiabá |
15 | 7 | 47% |
14 |
![]() Remo |
16 | 7 | 44% |
15 |
![]() Botafogo SP |
16 | 7 | 44% |
16 |
![]() Operário PR |
16 | 7 | 44% |
17 |
![]() Novorizontino |
15 | 10 | 67% |
18 |
![]() Ferroviária |
16 | 11 | 69% |
19 |
![]() Athletic Club |
15 | 8 | 53% |
20 |
![]() Amazonas |
16 | 9 | 56% |
21 |
![]() Criciúma EC |
0 | 0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Avaí |
15 | 9 | 60% |
2 |
![]() Athletico-PR |
16 | 12 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Chapecoense |
16 | 4 | 25% |
4 |
![]() Coritiba |
15 | 5 | 33% |
5 |
![]() Atlético Goianiense |
15 | 8 | 53% |
6 |
![]() América Mineiro |
15 | 6 | 40% |
7 |
![]() Vila Nova |
16 | 8 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Paysandu |
16 | 6 | 38% |
9 |
![]() Criciúma |
16 | 8 | 50% |
10 |
![]() CRB |
16 | 9 | 56% |
11 |
![]() Goiás |
15 | 6 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Volta Redonda |
16 | 5 | 31% |
13 |
![]() Cuiabá |
16 | 9 | 56% |
14 |
![]() Remo |
15 | 11 | 73% |
15 |
![]() Botafogo SP |
15 | 5 | 33% |
16 |
![]() Operário PR |
15 | 8 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Novorizontino |
16 | 4 | 25% |
18 |
![]() Ferroviária |
15 | 9 | 60% |
19 |
![]() Athletic Club |
16 | 7 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Amazonas |
15 | 10 | 67% |
21 |
![]() Criciúma EC |
1 | 0 | 0% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Criciúma and Athletico-PR have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie B.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.