# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
30 | 15 | 50% |
2 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 13 | 43% |
3 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 12 | 40% |
4 |
![]() Shaanxi Wuzhou |
30 | 11 | 37% |
5 |
![]() Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
30 | 10 | 33% |
6 |
![]() Yanbian Funde |
30 | 9 | 30% |
7 |
![]() Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 9 | 30% |
8 |
![]() Shenyang Zhongze |
30 | 9 | 30% |
9 |
![]() Chengdu Tiancheng |
30 | 9 | 30% |
10 |
![]() BIT |
30 | 8 | 27% |
11 |
![]() Shenzhen |
30 | 7 | 23% |
12 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 7 | 23% |
13 |
![]() Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 7 | 23% |
14 |
![]() Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 6 | 20% |
15 |
![]() Beijing BG |
30 | 6 | 20% |
16 |
![]() Chongqing |
30 | 4 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Funde |
15 | 9 | 60% |
2 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
15 | 9 | 60% |
3 |
![]() BIT |
15 | 8 | 53% |
4 |
![]() Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
15 | 7 | 47% |
5 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
15 | 6 | 40% |
6 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
15 | 6 | 40% |
7 |
![]() Tianjin Quanjian |
15 | 6 | 40% |
8 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
15 | 6 | 40% |
9 |
![]() Shenyang Zhongze |
15 | 6 | 40% |
10 |
![]() Chengdu Tiancheng |
15 | 6 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Hunan Xiangtao |
15 | 5 | 33% |
12 |
![]() Shaanxi Wuzhou |
15 | 5 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Guizhou Zhicheng |
15 | 4 | 27% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen |
15 | 4 | 27% |
15 |
![]() Beijing BG |
15 | 3 | 20% |
16 |
![]() Chongqing |
15 | 2 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
15 | 7 | 47% |
2 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
15 | 6 | 40% |
3 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
15 | 6 | 40% |
4 |
![]() Shaanxi Wuzhou |
15 | 6 | 40% |
5 |
![]() Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
15 | 3 | 20% |
6 |
![]() Tianjin Quanjian |
15 | 3 | 20% |
7 |
![]() Shenzhen |
15 | 3 | 20% |
8 |
![]() Beijing BG |
15 | 3 | 20% |
9 |
![]() Shenyang Zhongze |
15 | 3 | 20% |
10 |
![]() Chengdu Tiancheng |
15 | 3 | 20% |
11 |
![]() Guizhou Zhicheng |
15 | 2 | 13% |
12 |
![]() Hunan Xiangtao |
15 | 2 | 13% |
13 |
![]() Chongqing |
15 | 2 | 13% |
14 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
15 | 1 | 7% |
15 |
![]() Yanbian Funde |
15 | 0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() BIT |
15 | 0 | 0% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Chengdu Tiancheng vs Xinjiang Tianshan:
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.