# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shenzhen |
30 | 19 | 63% |
2 |
![]() Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 17 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 17 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Beijing BG |
30 | 17 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Shenyang Zhongze |
30 | 16 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Yanbian Funde |
30 | 15 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
30 | 15 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 15 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Chongqing |
30 | 15 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
30 | 14 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 13 | 43% |
12 |
![]() BIT |
30 | 13 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Shaanxi Wuzhou |
30 | 13 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 12 | 40% |
15 |
![]() Chengdu Tiancheng |
30 | 11 | 37% |
16 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 10 | 33% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Guizhou Zhicheng |
15 | 10 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Shenzhen |
15 | 10 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Beijing BG |
15 | 9 | 60% |
4 |
![]() Shaanxi Wuzhou |
15 | 9 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
15 | 8 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
15 | 8 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Tianjin Quanjian |
15 | 8 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Hunan Xiangtao |
15 | 8 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Chongqing |
15 | 8 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
15 | 7 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
15 | 7 | 47% |
12 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
15 | 6 | 40% |
13 |
![]() Shenyang Zhongze |
15 | 6 | 40% |
14 |
![]() Yanbian Funde |
15 | 5 | 33% |
15 |
![]() BIT |
15 | 4 | 27% |
16 |
![]() Chengdu Tiancheng |
15 | 3 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Funde |
15 | 10 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Shenyang Zhongze |
15 | 10 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Tianjin Quanjian |
15 | 9 | 60% |
4 |
![]() Shenzhen |
15 | 9 | 60% |
5 |
![]() BIT |
15 | 9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
15 | 8 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Chongqing Dangdai Lifan |
15 | 8 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Beijing BG |
15 | 8 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Chengdu Tiancheng |
15 | 8 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
15 | 7 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Guizhou Zhicheng |
15 | 7 | 47% |
12 |
![]() Chongqing |
15 | 7 | 47% |
13 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
15 | 5 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Hunan Xiangtao |
15 | 5 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Shaanxi Wuzhou |
15 | 4 | 27% |
16 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
15 | 2 | 13% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Chengdu Tiancheng and Xinjiang Tianshan have both scored and conceded in the same match in the China League One.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.