# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
20 | 71% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
17 | 61% |
3 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
16 | 59% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
16 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
15 | 54% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
15 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 46% |
12 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
13 | 46% |
13 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 43% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
12 | 43% |
15 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
12 | 43% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
12 | 41% |
17 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 39% |
18 |
![]() Rhode Island |
11 | 39% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 39% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
11 | 39% |
21 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
11 | 39% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 32% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 29% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 79% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
10 | 77% |
3 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Orange County |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 64% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 47% |
15 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 46% |
16 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 40% |
20 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
5 | 33% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 31% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 54% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 53% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
6 | 43% |
11 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Loudoun United |
6 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 38% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 36% |
18 |
![]() Orange County |
5 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 31% |
21 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 29% |
22 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 29% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 27% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
2 | 15% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
20 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
20 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
19 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Miami FC II |
17 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
17 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Loudoun United |
17 | 60% |
7 |
![]() San Antonio |
17 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Rhode Island |
17 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Lexington |
17 | 58% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
16 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
16 | 57% |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
16 | 57% |
13 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
15 | 53% |
14 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
15 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
13 | 46% |
18 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 46% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 42% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
12 | 42% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 42% |
22 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 40% |
23 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 39% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 28% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 69% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
10 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Miami FC II |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
8 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
7 | 53% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 42% |
18 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 35% |
21 |
![]() Orange County |
4 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 23% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
3 | 21% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
11 | 84% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 69% |
6 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 64% |
9 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Miami FC II |
8 | 61% |
12 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 57% |
13 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 57% |
14 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
8 | 57% |
16 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 46% |
20 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 46% |
21 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 46% |
22 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 42% |
23 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Charleston Battery and Colorado Springs in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Charleston Battery has come out and scored the first goal in 59% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 40% of matches.
Meanwhile, Colorado Springs comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 43% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 57% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.