Sat, 11 October 2025 - 19:30
Stadium: MUSC Health Stadium
Prediction# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
20 | 71% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
17 | 61% |
3 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 59% |
4 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
15 | 58% |
5 |
![]() New Mexico United |
16 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
15 | 54% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
15 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
13 | 46% |
12 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 46% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
12 | 44% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
12 | 43% |
15 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 43% |
16 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
11 | 39% |
17 |
![]() Lexington |
11 | 39% |
18 |
![]() Rhode Island |
11 | 39% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 39% |
20 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 39% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
11 | 39% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 32% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 29% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 79% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Orange County |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
7 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 43% |
16 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 40% |
20 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
5 | 33% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 31% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 54% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 43% |
11 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Loudoun United |
6 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
6 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 38% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 36% |
18 |
![]() Orange County |
5 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 31% |
21 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 31% |
22 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 29% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 27% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
2 | 15% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
20 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
20 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
19 | 67% |
4 |
![]() San Antonio |
17 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Rhode Island |
17 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Lexington |
17 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
17 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Loudoun United |
17 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Miami FC II |
17 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
16 | 57% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
16 | 57% |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
15 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
15 | 53% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
15 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
13 | 46% |
18 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 46% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 42% |
20 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 42% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 42% |
22 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
11 | 40% |
23 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 39% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 28% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 69% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
10 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Miami FC II |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
7 | 53% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 42% |
18 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 35% |
21 |
![]() Orange County |
4 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
3 | 21% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
11 | 84% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 69% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 64% |
9 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Miami FC II |
8 | 61% |
12 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
8 | 57% |
13 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 57% |
14 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 57% |
16 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 46% |
20 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 46% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 42% |
22 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
23 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 42% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Charleston Battery and Colorado Springs in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Charleston Battery has come out and scored the first goal in 58% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 42% of matches.
Meanwhile, Colorado Springs comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 44% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 55% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.