Group 1
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tuna Luso |
14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 10 | +14 | 27 | 1.93 | |
2 |
![]() Manauara |
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 27 | 11 | +16 | 26 | 1.86 | |
3 |
![]() Manaus |
14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 21 | 17 | +4 | 23 | 1.64 | |
4 |
![]() Independência Futebol Clube |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 19 | -1 | 21 | 1.50 | |
5 |
![]() Águia de Marabá |
14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 21 | 14 | +7 | 20 | 1.43 | |
6 |
![]() Trem |
14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 23 | 24 | -1 | 18 | 1.29 | |
7 |
![]() GAS |
14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 24 | -7 | 15 | 1.07 | |
8 |
![]() Humaitá |
14 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 44 | -32 | 4 | 0.29 |
Group 2
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Altos |
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 22 | 14 | +8 | 26 | 1.86 | |
2 |
![]() Imperatriz |
14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 15 | +2 | 24 | 1.71 | |
3 |
![]() Sampaio Corrêa |
14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 17 | 11 | +6 | 21 | 1.50 | |
4 |
![]() Maranhão |
14 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 18 | 12 | +6 | 19 | 1.36 | |
5 |
![]() Iguatu |
14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 18 | 1.29 | |
6 |
![]() Tocantinópolis |
14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 15 | 1.07 | |
7 |
![]() Parnahyba |
14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 22 | -6 | 14 | 1.00 | |
8 |
![]() Maracanã |
14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 12 | 0.86 |
Group 3
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() América RN |
14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 9 | +12 | 27 | 1.93 | |
2 |
![]() Santa Cruz |
14 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 9 | +11 | 27 | 1.93 | |
3 |
![]() Central |
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 15 | 7 | +8 | 26 | 1.86 | |
4 |
![]() Ferroviário |
14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 19 | -5 | 18 | 1.29 | |
5 |
![]() Horizonte |
14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 17 | 1.21 | |
6 |
![]() Santa Cruz de Natal RN |
14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 17 | 1.21 | |
7 |
![]() Treze |
14 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 13 | 0.93 | |
8 |
![]() Sousa |
14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 12 | 0.86 |
Group 4
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() ASA |
14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 27 | 8 | +19 | 31 | 2.21 | |
2 |
![]() Lagarto |
14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 16 | +4 | 23 | 1.64 | |
3 |
![]() Sergipe |
14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 22 | 1.57 | |
4 |
![]() Juazeirense |
14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 22 | 1.57 | |
5 |
![]() União Carmolandense |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 19 | 1.36 | |
6 |
![]() Jequié |
14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 16 | 1.14 | |
7 |
![]() Barcelona BA |
14 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 11 | 0.79 | |
8 |
![]() Penedense |
14 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 8 | 0.57 |
Group 5
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Aparecidense |
14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 12 | +20 | 32 | 2.29 | |
2 |
![]() Ceilândia |
14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 14 | +9 | 28 | 2.00 | |
3 |
![]() Luverdense |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 25 | 1.79 | |
4 |
![]() Mixto |
14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 21 | 13 | +8 | 23 | 1.64 | |
5 |
![]() Capital Brasilia |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 11 | +3 | 19 | 1.36 | |
6 |
![]() Goiânia |
14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 22 | -10 | 10 | 0.71 | |
7 |
![]() Goianésia |
14 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 22 | -11 | 8 | 0.57 | |
8 |
![]() Porto Velho |
14 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 30 | -21 | 7 | 0.50 |
Group 6
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Portuguesa |
14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 13 | +9 | 30 | 2.14 | |
2 |
![]() Rio Branco ES |
14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 26 | 1.86 | |
3 |
![]() Água Santa |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 18 | +2 | 21 | 1.50 | |
4 |
![]() Maricá |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 19 | 1.36 | |
5 |
![]() Porto Vitória |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 17 | 1.21 | |
6 |
![]() Pouso Alegre |
14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 17 | 1.21 | |
7 |
![]() Nova Iguaçu |
14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 15 | 1.07 | |
8 |
![]() Boavista |
14 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 23 | -14 | 9 | 0.64 |
Group 7
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Inter de Limeira |
14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 7 | +14 | 30 | 2.14 | |
2 |
![]() Goiatuba EC |
14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 21 | 16 | +5 | 22 | 1.57 | |
3 |
![]() Cianorte |
14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 22 | 1.57 | |
4 |
![]() Cascavel FC |
14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 | 1.50 | |
5 |
![]() Uberlândia |
14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 21 | 20 | +1 | 16 | 1.14 | |
6 |
![]() Monte Azul |
13 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 14 | 1.08 | |
7 |
![]() Operário MT |
13 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 21 | -10 | 11 | 0.85 | |
8 |
![]() Itabirito |
14 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 22 | -11 | 10 | 0.71 |
Group 8
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Barra FC |
14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 10 | +10 | 26 | 1.86 | |
2 |
![]() EC São José |
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 21 | 11 | +10 | 26 | 1.86 | |
3 |
![]() Marcílio Dias |
14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 17 | 15 | +2 | 21 | 1.50 | |
4 |
![]() Joinville |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 21 | 1.50 | |
5 |
![]() Guarany de Bagé |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 19 | 1.36 | |
6 |
![]() Brasil de Pelotas |
14 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 16 | 1.14 | |
7 |
![]() Azuriz |
14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 13 | 0.93 | |
8 |
![]() São Luiz |
14 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 13 | 0.93 |
At the moment, Cascavel FC is in 4th in the Serie D. In 14 matches, Cascavel FC has 5 wins, 6 draws, and 3 losses.
The club has picked up 21 points (adding up all matches, including knockout matches). So based on points per match, they have picked up 1.5 points per match to date in the tournament.
Here are more stats from Cascavel FC’s campaign at home in the Serie D below:
If we only look at Cascavel FC’s away matches, this is their current record:
As for Goiatuba EC’s campaign, they sit in 2nd in the competition table and this is the current state of their Serie D campaign:
As a result, Goiatuba EC has, in terms of the overall campaign, the 2th position on the leaderboard. When Goiatuba EC plays as home team, the situation is as follows: 7 games, 2 wins, 4 draws and 1 losses.
Now, when playing away from home, Goiatuba EC adds:
The competition table helps provide an overview of the teams’ performance during the current campaign and helps identify patterns, trends, and statistics relevant to analysing Cascavel FC vs Goiatuba EC.
With this data, you can check each club’s goal production, their position in the table, their goal difference, and other factors that can be useful for predicting the outcome of the match.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.