Capo II and FC Tucson face each other on Thursday 07.10.2025, at 00:00 (UK Time), in a USL League Two 2025 match. The game will take place at Capo II's home ground, the .
The APWin team has prepared a detailed analysis for this match, highlighting the most promising predictions, attractive odds, and betting markets with strong potential for returns.
APWin Predictions for Capo II vs FC Tucson
According to APWin's sports betting experts, there could be up to three promising betting markets for the Capo II vs FC Tucson match.
In addition to the main betting tip, our team also found alternative betting tips for the Birghton vs Liverpool match.
Capo II's Information for the Match
Capo II heads into the match with the following record in the USL League Two: in 11 matches, Capo II secured 7 victories, 2 draws, and 2 losses, maintaining an average of 2.09 points per game.
Taking a broader look at Capo II's 2025 season, the team has achieved a total of 7 victories so far.
Capo II has been effective in the offense, scoring a total of 30 goals, of which 30 were scored in the USL League Two, resulting in an average of 2.73 goals per game.
Individually, the standout performer is , who has found the back of the net 0 times. However, he is not alone in driving the offense. has taken on the role of the team's main playmaker, leading with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, Capo II has conceded 13 goals in the USL League Two (an average of 1.18 per game) and 13 goals throughout the entire season, with an average of 1.18 per match in the 2025 campaign.
FC Tucson's Information for the Match
FC Tucson comes into the game with 10 matches played so far in the USL League Two. They have secured 7 victories, 1 draws, and 2 losses, maintaining an average of 2.2 points per game in the competition.
Across all competitions in the 2025 season, the team has recorded 7 wins, 1 draws, and 2 losses.
FC Tucson's attack has been highly effective, scoring 54 goals during this period. Of that total, 54 were netted in the USL League Two, with an average of 5.4 goals per game. The overall season average is 5.4.
FC Tucson's offensive system is led by , the team's top scorer this season. The has found the back of the net 0 times. He is supported by the team's best assist provider, . The has contributed with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, the team has conceded 10 goals with an average of 1 per game in the championship. For the whole season, the team conceded 10 goals in 10 matches, averaging 1 per match.
Capo II vs FC Tucson Standings
To better understand the context of this matchup, let's analyze the recent campaign of both teams USL League Two. Below, we present a complete overview of the campaigns of both clubs so far, highlighting their performances and what this may indicate for the game.
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vermont Green |
19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 37 | 8 | +29 | 41 | 2.16 |
| 2 |
Western Mass Pioneers |
17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 48 | 9 | +39 | 38 | 2.24 |
| 3 |
Lionsbridge |
19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 59 | 19 | +40 | 37 | 1.95 |
| 4 |
Ballard |
19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 42 | 7 | +35 | 37 | 1.95 |
| 5 |
Dothan United |
16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 6 | +28 | 36 | 2.25 |
| 6 |
FC Motown II |
14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 9 | +27 | 36 | 2.57 |
| 7 |
Sarasota Paradise |
14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 8 | +31 | 33 | 2.36 |
| 8 |
Ventura County Fusion |
15 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 35 | 11 | +24 | 33 | 2.20 |
| 9 |
Laredo Heat |
13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 14 | +23 | 33 | 2.54 |
| 10 |
Michigan Bucks |
16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 34 | 14 | +20 | 33 | 2.06 |
| 11 |
Asheville City |
13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 44 | 6 | +38 | 32 | 2.46 |
| 12 |
Evergreen |
15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 36 | 16 | +20 | 32 | 2.13 |
| 13 |
Fort Wayne |
14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 10 | +17 | 32 | 2.29 |
| 14 |
San Juan SC |
15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 18 | +25 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 15 |
Des Moines Menace |
13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 42 | 19 | +23 | 31 | 2.38 |
| 16 |
Fort Lauderdale United |
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 11 | +12 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 17 |
Sueno |
14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 37 | 22 | +15 | 30 | 2.14 |
| 18 |
Louisiana Krewe |
14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 16 | +13 | 30 | 2.14 |
| 19 |
Snohomish United |
16 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 28 | 18 | +10 | 30 | 1.88 |
| 20 |
Long Island Rough Riders |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 32 | 16 | +16 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 21 |
Almaden |
15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 13 | +15 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 22 |
Minneapolis City SC |
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 33 | 19 | +14 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 23 |
Virginia Beach United |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 14 | +11 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 24 |
Hudson Valley Hammers |
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 24 | 15 | +9 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 25 |
North Carolina Fusion U23 |
13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 28 | 2.15 |
| 26 |
Little Rock Rangers |
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 7 | +18 | 27 | 2.08 |
| 27 |
Steel City |
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 16 | +13 | 27 | 2.08 |
| 28 |
FC Tucson |
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 56 | 12 | +44 | 26 | 1.86 |
| 29 |
Pinellas County |
12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 13 | +22 | 26 | 2.17 |
| 30 |
Peoria City |
13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 31 | 13 | +18 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 31 |
West Chester United II |
13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 30 | 17 | +13 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 32 |
RKC |
12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 36 | 16 | +20 | 25 | 2.08 |
| 33 |
Utah United |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 12 | +16 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 34 |
Midwest United |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 13 | +16 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 35 |
SF Glens |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 16 | +11 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 36 |
Ocean City Nor'easters |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 29 | 18 | +11 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 37 |
Sporting JAX |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 13 | +10 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 38 |
Black Rock FC |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 39 |
Lane United |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 17 | +10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 40 |
Capo II |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 14 | +17 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 41 |
Lexington II |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 42 |
FC Buffalo |
12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 13 | +5 | 23 | 1.92 |
| 43 |
Discoveries |
14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 27 | 23 | +4 | 23 | 1.64 |
| 44 |
City SC |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 12 | +20 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 45 |
North Carolina II |
12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 13 | +11 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 46 |
Colorado Storm |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 20 | +9 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 47 |
Albion Colorado |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 48 |
Annapolis Blues |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 21 | +8 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 49 |
SC United Bantams |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 50 |
AC Connecticut |
14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 22 | 1.57 |
| 51 |
Redlands |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 19 | +21 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 52 |
Rochester |
12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 53 |
Corpus Christi |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 54 |
New England SC |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 26 | 21 | +5 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 55 |
Ann Arbor |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 56 |
Bangers |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 57 |
Tennessee |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 58 |
Project 51O |
14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 59 |
AHFC Royals |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 17 | +10 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 60 |
Akron City |
12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 11 | +8 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 61 |
Charlottesville Blues |
14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 27 | 19 | +8 | 20 | 1.43 |
| 62 |
Oakland County |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 63 |
Hattiesburg |
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 20 | 1.82 |
| 64 |
San Francisco City |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 19 | 1.36 |
| 65 |
Denton Diablos |
11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 19 | 1.73 |
| 66 |
AMSG |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 18 | +13 | 18 | 1.50 |
| 67 |
The Villages |
11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 18 | 1.64 |
| 68 |
Nona |
10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 6 | +8 | 18 | 1.80 |
| 69 |
Houston FC |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 14 | +3 | 18 | 1.50 |
| 70 |
Lonestar |
11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 1.64 |
| 71 |
Columbus United |
11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 17 | 1.55 |
| 72 |
West Virginia Chaos |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 73 |
Flatirons Rush |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 74 |
Northern Indiana |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 75 |
Brazos Valley |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 23 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 76 |
Seacoast United Phantoms |
14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 21 | 25 | -4 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 77 |
Morris Elite |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 78 |
Birmingham Legion II |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 79 |
Midlakes United |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 27 | -7 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 80 |
Academica |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 23 | -10 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 81 |
Miami FC |
12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 82 |
Cedar Stars Rush |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 83 |
Kings Hammer Columbus |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 22 | -5 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 84 |
West Seattle Junction |
14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 16 | 1.14 |
| 85 |
Toledo Villa |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 86 |
Oly Town |
14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 28 | 29 | -1 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 87 |
River Light |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 88 |
Reading United |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 89 |
Bigfoot |
14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 27 | 33 | -6 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 90 |
Real Central New Jersey |
12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 16 | +3 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 91 |
Union Macomb |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 92 |
Sunflower State |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 93 |
Kings Hammer Sun City |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 94 |
FC Boston Bolts |
14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 14 | 1.00 |
| 95 |
Kalamazoo FC |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 24 | -10 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 96 |
Marin |
14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 35 | -15 | 14 | 1.00 |
| 97 |
Brooke House |
11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 13 | 1.18 |
| 98 |
Santafé Wanderers |
12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 33 | -11 | 13 | 1.08 |
| 99 |
Charlotte Eagles |
12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 18 | 23 | -5 | 12 | 1.00 |
| 100 |
Inter Gainesville |
11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 12 | 1.09 |
| View more standings Hide | ||||||||||
Data for Capo II vs FC Tucson: Complete Statistics
You can base your football prediction on the detailed information of the teams' statistics below.
Home Team
Capo II
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W L W D W |
2.09 |
| Home | W W W D W |
2.6 |
| Away | L D W W L |
1.67 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 64% | 80% | 50% |
| Goals | 3.91 | 3 | 4.67 |
| Scored | 2.73 | 2.8 | 2.67 |
| Conceded | 1.18 | 0.2 | 2 |
| Both Teams to Score | 45% | 20% | 67% |
| Without Conceding | 36% | 80% | 0% |
| Failed To Score | 27% | 20% | 33% |
| 1st to Score | 45% | 60% | 33% |
|
xG
|
1.37 | 1.43 | 1.29 |
|
xGA
|
1.09 | 1 | 1.22 |
Away Team
FC Tucson
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W W D L W |
2.2 |
| Home | W W W W W |
3 |
| Away | D L W L W |
1.4 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 70% | 100% | 40% |
| Goals | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Scored | 5.4 | 6 | 4.8 |
| Conceded | 1 | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Both Teams to Score | 50% | 40% | 60% |
| Without Conceding | 40% | 60% | 20% |
| Failed To Score | 10% | 0% | 20% |
| 1st to Score | 45% | 80% | 40% |
|
xG
|
2.03 | 2.21 | 1.8 |
|
xGA
|
1.22 | 1.02 | 1.5 |
See below all the details of the clash between Capo II vs FC Tucson.
Capo II vs FC Tucson Preview, Livescore and H2H
At APWin, you can also find the complete statistical analysis of the USL League Two.
How to Watch Capo II vs FC Tucson Live on TV and Online?
To make it easier for you to watch the match and place live bets, APWin has gathered all the information about where to watch the game, including TV channels and streaming platforms.
Check out other alternatives to follow the USL League Two without missing a single moment!
Facts and Trends for the Clash
The bookmakers place FC Tucson as the favorite to win the match, with a 22% chance of victory. During the analysis of this prediction, the average odds were as follows:
Capo II to win - 4.48.
Draw - 4.61.
FC Tucson to win - 1.81.
The last match between the teams took place on 12/06/2024, in the USL League Two, and Capo II won the match. The final score was 1-3.
