BIT 0 - 3 Dalian Yifang
12.09.2015 - 04:00
Stadium: Beijing Institute of Technology Eastern Athletic Field
Finished
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 13 | 43% | 53% | 33% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 14 | 47% | 40% | 53% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 15 | 50% | 53% | 47% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 10 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 17 | 57% | 60% | 53% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 8 | 27% | 27% | 27% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 16 | 53% | 60% | 47% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 10 | 33% | 27% | 40% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 19 | 63% | 67% | 60% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 13 | 43% | 47% | 40% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 14 | 47% | 40% | 53% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 9 | 30% | 13% | 47% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 16 | 53% | 47% | 60% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 11 | 37% | 40% | 33% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 21 | 70% | 73% | 67% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 16 | 53% | 60% | 47% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 28 | 93% | 87% | 100% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 28 | 93% | 100% | 87% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 27 | 90% | 87% | 93% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 25 | 83% | 87% | 80% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 26 | 87% | 87% | 87% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 26 | 87% | 93% | 80% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 27 | 90% | 87% | 93% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 23 | 77% | 87% | 67% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 22 | 73% | 67% | 80% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 23 | 77% | 73% | 80% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 20 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 23 | 77% | 73% | 80% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 19 | 63% | 60% | 67% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 27 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 17 | 57% | 60% | 53% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 27 | 90% | 87% | 93% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 22 | 73% | 80% | 67% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 19 | 63% | 67% | 60% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 20 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 25 | 83% | 80% | 87% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 20 | 67% | 60% | 73% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 26 | 87% | 87% | 87% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 23 | 77% | 80% | 73% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 10 | 33% | 40% | 27% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 9 | 30% | 33% | 27% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 7 | 23% | 13% | 33% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 12 | 40% | 33% | 47% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 4 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 8 | 27% | 33% | 20% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 5 | 17% | 20% | 13% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 11 | 37% | 40% | 33% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 7 | 23% | 20% | 27% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 7 | 23% | 20% | 27% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 6 | 20% | 13% | 27% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 6 | 20% | 13% | 27% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 15 | 50% | 53% | 47% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 5 | 17% | 20% | 13% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 6 | 20% | 13% | 27% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 8 | 27% | 13% | 40% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 4 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 6 | 20% | 13% | 27% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 4 | 13% | 20% | 7% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 13% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 3 | 10% | 20% | 0% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 5 | 17% | 27% | 7% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 6 | 20% | 7% | 33% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 13% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 4 | 13% | 20% | 7% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 3 | 10% | 20% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 17 | 57% | 47% | 67% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 16 | 53% | 60% | 47% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 15 | 50% | 47% | 53% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 20 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 13 | 43% | 40% | 47% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 22 | 73% | 73% | 73% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 14 | 47% | 40% | 53% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 20 | 67% | 73% | 60% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 11 | 37% | 33% | 40% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 17 | 57% | 53% | 60% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 16 | 53% | 60% | 47% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 21 | 70% | 87% | 53% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 14 | 47% | 53% | 40% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 19 | 63% | 60% | 67% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 9 | 30% | 27% | 33% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 14 | 47% | 40% | 53% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 13% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 5 | 17% | 13% | 20% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 4 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 4 | 13% | 7% | 20% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 7 | 23% | 13% | 33% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 8 | 27% | 33% | 20% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 10 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 7 | 23% | 27% | 20% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 11 | 37% | 40% | 33% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 13 | 43% | 40% | 47% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 8 | 27% | 20% | 33% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 11 | 37% | 33% | 40% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 10 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 5 | 17% | 20% | 13% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 10 | 33% | 40% | 27% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 4 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 7 | 23% | 20% | 27% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 20 | 67% | 60% | 73% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 21 | 70% | 67% | 73% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 23 | 77% | 87% | 67% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 23 | 77% | 73% | 80% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 18 | 60% | 67% | 53% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 26 | 87% | 87% | 87% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 22 | 73% | 67% | 80% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 25 | 83% | 80% | 87% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 19 | 63% | 60% | 67% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 23 | 77% | 80% | 73% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 23 | 77% | 80% | 73% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 24 | 80% | 87% | 73% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 24 | 80% | 87% | 73% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 23 | 77% | 73% | 80% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 15 | 50% | 47% | 53% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 23 | 77% | 73% | 80% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 25 | 83% | 80% | 87% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 24 | 80% | 87% | 73% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 28 | 93% | 87% | 100% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 22 | 73% | 87% | 60% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 27 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 27 | 90% | 87% | 93% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 26 | 87% | 87% | 87% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 24 | 80% | 87% | 73% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 26 | 87% | 80% | 93% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 28 | 93% | 100% | 87% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 27 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 27 | 90% | 80% | 100% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 23 | 77% | 73% | 80% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 25 | 83% | 73% | 93% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Funde |
30 | 27 | 90% | 87% | 93% |
| 2 |
Hebei CFFC |
30 | 28 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 3 |
Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 |
Dalian Yifang |
30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 5 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
30 | 24 | 80% | 93% | 67% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Quanjian |
30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 7 |
Shenzhen |
30 | 28 | 93% | 100% | 87% |
| 8 |
Wuhan Zall |
30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 9 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 27 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 10 |
Beijing BG |
30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 11 |
Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 |
Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 13 |
Hunan Xiangtao |
30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 15 |
BIT |
30 | 26 | 87% | 80% | 93% |
| 16 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
30 | 27 | 90% | 80% | 100% |
You can check out how often BIT and Dalian Yifang matches in the China League One go over or under a certain number of goals on this page. This is a handy tool to help predict how many goals they could potentially score when they meet in their upcoming match.
Here is an example of what we mean:
87% of BIT’s matches in the China League One have had more than 1.5 goals scored. And when we raise the line of total goals to 2.5, then the rate of matches that go over that number is 70%.
You can also check how many times the total has gone under. In Dalian Yifang’s case, 33% of their matches have seen under 1.5 goals scored. And in terms of matches with under 2.5 goals, the rate is 67%.
You can also see whether BIT and Dalian Yifang matches go over or under a total number of goals when playing at home, away, or overall in China League One.
The over/under goal analysis for BIT vs Dalian Yifang offers valuable insights into each club's playing styles as well as a reasonable estimation of goals we could see in the match.
However, predicting the number of goals in a match does not always go the way the math says it will. It’s important to always consider other factors as well in order to get the best chance of making an accurate prediction.