# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
16 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
14 | 61% |
3 |
![]() New Mexico United |
14 | 61% |
4 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
14 | 61% |
5 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
14 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
14 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
14 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Orange County |
11 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
11 | 46% |
11 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 46% |
12 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
11 | 46% |
13 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
11 | 46% |
14 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
10 | 43% |
15 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 43% |
16 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 43% |
17 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Lexington |
10 | 42% |
19 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 36% |
21 |
![]() Rhode Island |
8 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 29% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
6 | 26% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
6 | 26% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
10 | 83% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 70% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 58% |
9 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 58% |
10 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 58% |
11 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 55% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 50% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 46% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 46% |
17 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 42% |
19 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 36% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 31% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 27% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
9 | 69% |
2 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 58% |
5 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 46% |
9 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 45% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
5 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
4 | 36% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 36% |
13 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
4 | 36% |
14 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 36% |
15 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 33% |
17 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 33% |
18 |
![]() Orange County |
4 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Loudoun United |
4 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 31% |
21 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 31% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
17 | 73% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
17 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
17 | 70% |
4 |
![]() Rhode Island |
16 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
16 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Loudoun United |
15 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Lexington |
14 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
13 | 56% |
9 |
![]() San Antonio |
13 | 56% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
13 | 56% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
13 | 56% |
12 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 54% |
13 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
13 | 54% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
13 | 54% |
15 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 54% |
16 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Orange County |
11 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
10 | 41% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
10 | 41% |
20 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
10 | 41% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
9 | 39% |
22 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 39% |
23 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
9 | 39% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 33% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 72% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
9 | 69% |
4 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
7 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
8 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Miami FC II |
7 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
5 | 45% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 45% |
15 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 41% |
16 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 41% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
5 | 41% |
18 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 40% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
4 | 36% |
20 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
21 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
2 | 16% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 90% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
8 | 72% |
4 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 69% |
6 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Orange County |
8 | 66% |
8 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 66% |
9 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 66% |
10 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
7 | 63% |
12 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 63% |
13 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 63% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 63% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
7 | 58% |
16 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 54% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 53% |
18 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 45% |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
5 | 45% |
20 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 41% |
21 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
5 | 41% |
22 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
4 | 36% |
23 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
4 | 33% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 30% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Birmingham Legion and Pittsburgh Riverhounds in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Birmingham Legion has come out and scored the first goal in 26% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 73% of matches.
Meanwhile, Pittsburgh Riverhounds comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 46% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 54% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.