Favourite this Match

Atlante 1 - 0 Potros UAEM

09.11.2018 - 20:00

Stadium: Estadio Olímpico Andrés Quintana Roo

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Dorados Team Logo

Dorados

40 17 43%
2
Leones Negros de la Universidad de Guadalajara Team Logo

Leones Negros de la Universidad de Guadalajara

30 16 53%
3
Atlante Team Logo

Atlante

32 22 69%
4
Atlético Zacatepec Team Logo

Atlético Zacatepec

30 15 50%
5
Potros UAEM Team Logo

Potros UAEM

28 13 46%
6
Cimarrones de Sonora Team Logo

Cimarrones de Sonora

32 16 50%
7
Juárez Team Logo

Juárez

32 16 50%
8
Tampico Madero Team Logo

Tampico Madero

28 17 61%
9
Venados Team Logo

Venados

32 16 50%
10
Correcaminos UAT Team Logo

Correcaminos UAT

28 16 57%
11
Cafetaleros de Tapachula Team Logo

Cafetaleros de Tapachula

28 20 71%
12
Atlético San Luis Team Logo

Atlético San Luis

40 21 53%
13
Mineros de Zacatecas Team Logo

Mineros de Zacatecas

34 17 50%
14
Alebrijes de Oaxaca Team Logo

Alebrijes de Oaxaca

32 13 41%
15
Celaya Team Logo

Celaya

30 19 63%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Dorados Team Logo

Dorados

20 9 45%
2
Leones Negros de la Universidad de Guadalajara Team Logo

Leones Negros de la Universidad de Guadalajara

15 10 67%
3
Atlante Team Logo

Atlante

16 10 63%
4
Atlético Zacatepec Team Logo

Atlético Zacatepec

15 8 53%
5
Potros UAEM Team Logo

Potros UAEM

14 8 57%
6
Cimarrones de Sonora Team Logo

Cimarrones de Sonora

16 9 56%
7
Juárez Team Logo

Juárez

16 8 50%
8
Tampico Madero Team Logo

Tampico Madero

14 8 57%
9
Venados Team Logo

Venados

16 8 50%
10
Correcaminos UAT Team Logo

Correcaminos UAT

14 8 57%
11
Cafetaleros de Tapachula Team Logo

Cafetaleros de Tapachula

14 8 57%
12
Atlético San Luis Team Logo

Atlético San Luis

20 9 45%
13
Mineros de Zacatecas Team Logo

Mineros de Zacatecas

17 10 59%
14
Alebrijes de Oaxaca Team Logo

Alebrijes de Oaxaca

16 5 31%
15
Celaya Team Logo

Celaya

15 9 60%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Dorados Team Logo

Dorados

20 8 40%
2
Leones Negros de la Universidad de Guadalajara Team Logo

Leones Negros de la Universidad de Guadalajara

15 6 40%
3
Atlante Team Logo

Atlante

16 12 75%
4
Atlético Zacatepec Team Logo

Atlético Zacatepec

15 7 47%
5
Potros UAEM Team Logo

Potros UAEM

14 5 36%
6
Cimarrones de Sonora Team Logo

Cimarrones de Sonora

16 7 44%
7
Juárez Team Logo

Juárez

16 8 50%
8
Tampico Madero Team Logo

Tampico Madero

14 9 64%
9
Venados Team Logo

Venados

16 8 50%
10
Correcaminos UAT Team Logo

Correcaminos UAT

14 8 57%
11
Cafetaleros de Tapachula Team Logo

Cafetaleros de Tapachula

14 12 86%
12
Atlético San Luis Team Logo

Atlético San Luis

20 12 60%
13
Mineros de Zacatecas Team Logo

Mineros de Zacatecas

17 7 41%
14
Alebrijes de Oaxaca Team Logo

Alebrijes de Oaxaca

16 8 50%
15
Celaya Team Logo

Celaya

15 10 67%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Atlante and Potros UAEM have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Ascenso MX.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 32 matches played in the Ascenso MX, Atlante has scored and conceded goals in 22 matches. In other words, 69% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 63% at home, while it is 75% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Potros UAEM has scored and conceded in 13 of their 28 matches so far in the Ascenso MX, giving them a BTTS rate of 46%. Both teams have scored in 8 of Potros UAEM’s 14 home matches, and it has happened 5 times in 14 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets