| -1 | 1 : 0 | ||
| -1 | 1 : 1 |
50%
Ball Posession
50%
2
Shots
9
1
Shots On Target
5
1
Shots Off Target
4
6
Corner Kicks
5
2
Offsides
2
4
Fouls
7
Over 2.5 Goals
Ann Arbor
3
Wins
Ann Arbor
3
No Losses
Ann Arbor
6
Matches Conceding Goals
Ann Arbor
3
No Wins
Union Macomb
4
Losses
Union Macomb
4
Matches Conceding Goals
Union Macomb
9
No Losses
Ann Arbor
3
Matches Conceding Goals
Ann Arbor
3
Matches Conceding Goals
Union Macomb
3
2.83
League: 3.41
53%
League 56%
88%
League 83%
65%
League 64%
0
League 0.33
13
League 9.11
1.91/Match
+91%
Ann Arbor is +91% better in terms of Form
1/Match
2.2/Match
+267%
Ann Arbor is +267% better in terms of Form
0.6/Match
1.22/Match
+22%
Ann Arbor is +22% better in terms of Forms 1st Half
1/Match
Form
1.8/Match
+20%
Ann Arbor is +20% better in terms of Form
1.5/Match
Form - Last 5
1.8/Match
1.8/Match
+20%
Ann Arbor is +20% better in terms of Form
1.5/Match
1.75/Match
+71%
Union Macomb is +71% better in terms of Forms 1st Half
3/Match
Ann Arbor
0%
2
Wins
1
Draw
0
Wins
Union Macomb
0%
100%
3/3 Matches
100%
3/3 Matches
100%
3/3 Matches
67%
2/3 Matches
Ann Arbor
0%
1
Wins
0
Draw
0
Wins
Union Macomb
0%
100%
1/1 Matches
100%
1/1 Matches
100%
1/1 Matches
100%
1/1 Matches
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vermont Green
|
12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 2 |
Dothan United
|
9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 4 | 16 | 23 | 2.56 |
| 3 |
Ballard
|
11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 20 | 1.82 |
| 4 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 20 | 2.50 |
| 5 |
Michigan Bucks
|
9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 20 | 2.22 |
| 6 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 4 | 19 | 20 | 2.50 |
| 7 |
Lionsbridge
|
10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 29 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 1.90 |
| 8 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 18 | 2.25 |
| 9 |
Laredo Heat
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 2.57 |
| 10 |
Fort Wayne
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 2.57 |
| 11 |
Des Moines Menace
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 12 | 17 | 18 | 2.57 |
| 12 |
San Juan SC
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 18 | 2.57 |
| 13 |
Little Rock Rangers
|
6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 18 | 3.00 |
| 14 |
Minneapolis City SC
|
8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 2.25 |
| 15 |
FC Motown II
|
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 17 | 2.43 |
| 16 |
Asheville City
|
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 2.29 |
| 17 |
Evergreen
|
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 16 | 2.29 |
| 18 |
Sueno
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 16 | 2.67 |
| 19 |
FC Tucson
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 28 | 16 | 2.67 |
| 20 |
RKC
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 16 | 2.67 |
| 21 |
Sporting JAX
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 2.67 |
| 22 |
Fort Lauderdale United
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 15 | 2.50 |
| 23 |
Utah United
|
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 15 | 2.14 |
| 24 |
Lane United
|
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 2.14 |
| 25 |
Discoveries
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 2.50 |
| 26 |
SC United Bantams
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 2.50 |
| 27 |
North Carolina Fusion U23
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 2.33 |
| 28 |
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 14 | 2.33 |
| 29 |
SF Glens
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 14 | 2.00 |
| 30 |
Black Rock FC
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 14 | 2.00 |
| 31 |
Capo II
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 14 | 2.33 |
| 32 |
Louisiana Krewe
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 33 |
Long Island Rough Riders
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 34 |
Hudson Valley Hammers
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 35 |
Pinellas County
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 36 |
Peoria City
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 37 |
West Chester United II
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 38 |
Ocean City Nor'easters
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 39 |
FC Buffalo
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 40 |
Albion Colorado
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 41 |
Midwest United
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 2.00 |
| 42 |
Lexington II
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 2.00 |
| 43 |
City SC
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 12 | 2.00 |
| 44 |
North Carolina II
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 2.00 |
| 45 |
Snohomish United
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 46 |
Almaden
|
8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 11 | 1.38 |
| 47 |
Virginia Beach United
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 48 |
Colorado Storm
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 1.67 |
| 49 |
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1.43 |
| 50 |
AC Connecticut
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 | 1.43 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 24 | 19 | 2.38 |
| 2 |
FC Motown II
|
7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 19 | 2.71 |
| 3 |
Snohomish United
|
9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 19 | 2.11 |
| 4 |
Almaden
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 18 | 2.57 |
| 5 |
Virginia Beach United
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 18 | 2.57 |
| 6 |
Vermont Green
|
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 17 | 2.43 |
| 7 |
Ballard
|
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 17 | 2.13 |
| 8 |
Lionsbridge
|
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 30 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 2.13 |
| 9 |
Asheville City
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 2.67 |
| 10 |
Evergreen
|
8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 16 | 2.00 |
| 11 |
Fort Lauderdale United
|
9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 16 | 1.78 |
| 12 |
Louisiana Krewe
|
8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 2.00 |
| 13 |
Laredo Heat
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 15 | 2.50 |
| 14 |
Long Island Rough Riders
|
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 15 | 2.14 |
| 15 |
Hudson Valley Hammers
|
8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 15 | 1.88 |
| 16 |
Fort Wayne
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 2.00 |
| 17 |
Sueno
|
8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 1.75 |
| 18 |
North Carolina Fusion U23
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 14 | 2.00 |
| 19 |
Dothan United
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 20 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 21 |
Michigan Bucks
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 22 |
Des Moines Menace
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 23 |
San Juan SC
|
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 13 | 1.63 |
| 24 |
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 25 |
Pinellas County
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 26 |
Peoria City
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 27 |
West Chester United II
|
7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 28 |
Midwest United
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 29 |
Lexington II
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 2.00 |
| 30 |
Colorado Storm
|
7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 12 | 1.71 |
| 31 |
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 2.00 |
| 32 |
AC Connecticut
|
7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 1.71 |
| 33 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 34 |
Little Rock Rangers
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 35 |
Minneapolis City SC
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 36 |
SF Glens
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 37 |
Black Rock FC
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 38 |
Ocean City Nor'easters
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 1.83 |
| 39 |
FC Tucson
|
8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 10 | 1.25 |
| 40 |
Utah United
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 1.67 |
| 41 |
Lane United
|
7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 1.43 |
| 42 |
Discoveries
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 10 | 1.43 |
| 43 |
Capo II
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 1.67 |
| 44 |
FC Buffalo
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 10 | 1.67 |
| 45 |
City SC
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 1.67 |
| 46 |
North Carolina II
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 | 1.67 |
| 47 |
RKC
|
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 1.50 |
| 48 |
Albion Colorado
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 1.50 |
| 49 |
Sporting JAX
|
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 7 | 1.00 |
| 50 |
SC United Bantams
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 | 1.17 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vermont Green
|
19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 37 | 8 | 29 | 41 | 2.16 |
| 2 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 48 | 9 | 39 | 37 | 2.31 |
| 3 |
Ballard
|
19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 42 | 7 | 35 | 37 | 1.95 |
| 4 |
Lionsbridge
|
18 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 59 | 19 | 40 | 36 | 2.00 |
| 5 |
Dothan United
|
16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 6 | 28 | 36 | 2.25 |
| 6 |
FC Motown II
|
14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 9 | 27 | 36 | 2.57 |
| 7 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 8 | 31 | 33 | 2.36 |
| 8 |
Laredo Heat
|
13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 14 | 23 | 33 | 2.54 |
| 9 |
Michigan Bucks
|
16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 34 | 14 | 20 | 33 | 2.06 |
| 10 |
Asheville City
|
13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 44 | 6 | 38 | 32 | 2.46 |
| 11 |
Evergreen
|
15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 36 | 16 | 20 | 32 | 2.13 |
| 12 |
Fort Wayne
|
14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 10 | 17 | 32 | 2.29 |
| 13 |
Des Moines Menace
|
13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 19 | 26 | 31 | 2.38 |
| 14 |
San Juan SC
|
15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 18 | 25 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 15 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 33 | 11 | 22 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 16 |
Fort Lauderdale United
|
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 17 |
Sueno
|
14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 37 | 22 | 15 | 30 | 2.14 |
| 18 |
Snohomish United
|
16 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 28 | 18 | 10 | 30 | 1.88 |
| 19 |
Little Rock Rangers
|
13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 29 | 2.23 |
| 20 |
Almaden
|
15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 13 | 15 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 21 |
Minneapolis City SC
|
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 33 | 19 | 14 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 22 |
Louisiana Krewe
|
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 23 |
Virginia Beach United
|
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 14 | 11 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 24 |
Long Island Rough Riders
|
13 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 28 | 2.15 |
| 25 |
North Carolina Fusion U23
|
13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 28 | 2.15 |
| 26 |
Hudson Valley Hammers
|
14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 28 | 2.00 |
| 27 |
|
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 16 | 13 | 27 | 2.08 |
| 28 |
FC Tucson
|
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 56 | 12 | 44 | 26 | 1.86 |
| 29 |
Pinellas County
|
12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 13 | 22 | 26 | 2.17 |
| 30 |
Peoria City
|
13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 31 | 13 | 18 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 31 |
West Chester United II
|
13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 30 | 17 | 13 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 32 |
RKC
|
12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 36 | 16 | 20 | 25 | 2.08 |
| 33 |
Utah United
|
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 11 | 17 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 34 |
Midwest United
|
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 13 | 16 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 35 |
SF Glens
|
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 16 | 11 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 36 |
Black Rock FC
|
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 37 |
Lane United
|
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 38 |
Discoveries
|
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 26 | 20 | 6 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 39 |
Capo II
|
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 14 | 17 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 40 |
Ocean City Nor'easters
|
13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 29 | 18 | 11 | 24 | 1.85 |
| 41 |
Lexington II
|
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 42 |
Sporting JAX
|
13 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 23 | 1.77 |
| 43 |
FC Buffalo
|
12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 23 | 1.92 |
| 44 |
City SC
|
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 12 | 20 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 45 |
North Carolina II
|
12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 46 |
Colorado Storm
|
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 20 | 9 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 47 |
Albion Colorado
|
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 48 |
|
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 21 | 8 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 49 |
SC United Bantams
|
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 50 |
AC Connecticut
|
14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 22 | 1.57 |
Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb: Pre-Match Statistics and Analysis - USL League Two 2025
These are all the statistics you need to know for the Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb match scheduled for 08/07/2025 at 07:00 PM.
Get a full breakdown of both teams with complete statistics throughout the competition. Check out the latest team trends, current form, goals scored and conceded, head-to-head history, and other important information.
Relevant facts about Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb
Here is some information about Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb that could prove helpful in your analysis of the match:
Matches with goals conceded: Ann Arbor has conceded at least one goal in their last 3 matches in the competition.
Undefeated: Ann Arbor has gone 6 matches without losing in this competition.
Over 2.5 goals: The last 3 matches involving Ann Arbor have seen over 2.5 goals scored.
Winless: Union Macomb is currently on a run of 4 consecutive matches without winning in the competition.
Matches with goals conceded: Union Macomb has conceded at least one goal in their last 9 matches in the competition.
Defeats: Union Macomb has suffered 4 straight losses in the competition.
And now here is a list of statistical probabilities for the upcoming Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb match in the USL League Two.
Stat Probabilities for Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb
Here are the percentage chances that certain statistical events will happen in Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb, according to our projection system.
BTTS: The statistics say the chances of both teams scoring in Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb is 53%.
Over 2.5 goals: The combination of stats for Ann Arbor and Union Macomb show that there is 65% chance of over 2.5 goals scored in this match.
Aside from all the different stats for this match, you can also check out our free predictions for this and other matches, which provide more important details.
Overall Performance of Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb
Let's now take a look at how Ann Arbor and Union Macomb have performed thus far in the USL League Two. Ann Arbor has played 11 matches and has a record of 6 wins, 3 draws, and 2 losses.
Meanwhile, Union Macomb has 3 wins, 1 draws, and 6 losses in 10 matches thus far.
So based on those numbers, Ann Arbor has a win rate of 55%, while Union Macomb has come out on top in 30% of their matches.
Ann Arbor - Home performance
Ann Arbor has played at home 5 times in the USL League Two, and has the following record in those matches:
Wins: 3
Draws: 0
Defeats: 2
That gives Ann Arbor a 60% win rate at their home stadium. They have been held to draws 0% of the time, while losses make up 40% of their home matches.
Union Macomb - Away performance
On the opposite side, Union Macomb has played 4 away matches thus far, and these are their numbers as the visiting side:
Wins: 2
Draws: 0
Defeats: 2
In terms of percentages, Union Macomb has won 50% of away matches. They have drawn with their hosts in 0% of those matches and have suffered defeat 50% of the time as visitors.
And if you're interested in finding out more home and away statistics for both sides, you can also get that information on this page.
Goal statistics for Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb
Goal statistics are a good way to see how both teams perform offensively and defensively. So here are the goals scored and conceded numbers of Ann Arbor and Union Macomb ahead of their upcoming matchup.
Goals scored
Ann Arbor has scored a total of 19 goals so far in the USL League Two, while their opponent Union Macomb has found the back of the net 10 times to date.
Based on average goals scored, Ann Arbor has an average of 1.73 goals scored in this current campaign, and Union Macomb has scored 1 on average.
These scoring statistics help give a deeper understanding of the two sides' attacking ability thus far in the competition. And if you'd like to see more detailed stats of the two teams, the APWin platform also provides goals scored at home and away, expected goals, and first to score stats.
Goals conceded
On the defensive side of the ball, Ann Arbor has conceded 14 goals in 11 matches, which is an average of 1.27 goals conceded per match.
Meanwhile, visiting Union Macomb has an average of 1.6 goals conceded per match after surrendering 16 goals in 10 matches.
And for additional information about the two teams' defences during the current campaign, check out the tables above, which provide clean sheet percentages and expected goals against stats.
Direct Matchups Between Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb
Ann Arbor and Union Macomb have played each other 3 times in recent years. In those matches, Ann Arbor has 2 wins, Union Macomb has 0 wins, and there have been 1 draws.
These recent head-to-head numbers should make clear who has had the upper hand in this matchup, or if the two sides have been more evenly matched. Moreover, it may help in predicting the outcome of the next Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb match.
Other trends from recent matchups
Undefeated: Ann Arbor has not lost to Union Macomb in their last 3 matches.
Matches with goals conceded: Ann Arbor has conceded at least one goal in each of the last 3 matches against Union Macomb.
These statistics for the Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb match are just the tip of the iceberg, as you can find so much more data for all the upcoming matches. Check out the teams' average corners per game, expected goals stats, yellow and red cards, and plenty of other information to help football fans make more educated bets and predictions.
Here are some additional FAQs about Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb that you may find helpful.
What is the head-to-head record between Ann Arbor and Union Macomb?
In their past 3 matches, Ann Arbor has 2 wins, Union Macomb has 0 wins, and there have been 1 draws.
Where to find Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb prediction?
You can find our predictions for Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb.
What was the last match between Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb?
The last match between the two sides was on 23/05/2025. The result of that match was Union Macomb 1 vs 1 Ann Arbor.
Where to find Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb stats?
You can find goal statistics for Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb above, not to mention a number of other different data about the two teams.
Where to watch Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb?
You can check out the stream for Ann Arbor vs Union Macomb.