Altos 3 - 0 Fluminense PI
25.05.2024 - 15:00
Stadium: Estádio Municipal Felipe Raulino
Finished
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
América RN |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 2 |
ASA |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 3 |
Brasil de Pelotas |
18 | 8 | 44% |
| 4 |
Moto Club MA |
14 | 11 | 79% |
| 5 |
Ríver |
16 | 8 | 50% |
| 6 |
Águia de Marabá |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 7 |
CRAC |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 8 |
Treze |
20 | 9 | 45% |
| 9 |
Brasiliense |
20 | 10 | 50% |
| 10 |
Rio Branco |
14 | 10 | 71% |
| 11 |
Ipatinga |
14 | 3 | 21% |
| 12 |
Portuguesa RJ |
18 | 7 | 39% |
| 13 |
Maranhão |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 14 |
Novo Hamburgo |
16 | 11 | 69% |
| 15 |
Sergipe |
14 | 5 | 36% |
| 16 |
São Raimundo RR |
14 | 8 | 57% |
| 17 |
Anápolis |
24 | 13 | 54% |
| 18 |
Trem |
14 | 10 | 71% |
| 19 |
Princesa Solimões |
15 | 6 | 40% |
| 20 |
Potiguar Mossoró |
14 | 5 | 36% |
| 21 |
Itabaiana |
22 | 9 | 41% |
| 22 |
União Rondonópolis |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 23 |
Altos |
18 | 11 | 61% |
| 24 |
Juazeirense |
14 | 6 | 43% |
| 25 |
Sousa |
14 | 3 | 21% |
| 26 |
Atlético Cearense |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 27 |
Maringá |
22 | 11 | 50% |
| 28 |
Tocantinópolis |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 29 |
Jacuipense |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 30 |
Água Santa |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 31 |
Santo André |
14 | 5 | 36% |
| 32 |
São José EC |
14 | 6 | 43% |
| 33 |
Noroeste |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 34 |
Inter de Limeira |
20 | 4 | 20% |
| 35 |
Cianorte |
18 | 11 | 61% |
| 36 |
Iporá |
14 | 5 | 36% |
| 37 |
Nova Iguaçu |
18 | 5 | 28% |
| 38 |
Manaus |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 39 |
Mixto |
16 | 10 | 63% |
| 40 |
Serra |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 41 |
Santa Cruz de Natal RN |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 42 |
Avenida |
16 | 9 | 56% |
| 43 |
Concórdia AC |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 44 |
Barra FC |
14 | 6 | 43% |
| 45 |
Real FC |
14 | 5 | 36% |
| 46 |
Cametá |
14 | 8 | 57% |
| 47 |
Itabuna Esporte Clube |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 48 |
Petrolina Social Futebol Clube |
14 | 3 | 21% |
| 49 |
Patrocinense |
14 | 4 | 29% |
| 50 |
Hercílio Luz |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
América RN |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 2 |
ASA |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 3 |
Brasil de Pelotas |
9 | 4 | 44% |
| 4 |
Moto Club MA |
7 | 6 | 86% |
| 5 |
Ríver |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 6 |
Águia de Marabá |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 7 |
CRAC |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 8 |
Treze |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 9 |
Brasiliense |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 10 |
Rio Branco |
7 | 6 | 86% |
| 11 |
Ipatinga |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 12 |
Portuguesa RJ |
9 | 3 | 33% |
| 13 |
Maranhão |
8 | 1 | 13% |
| 14 |
Novo Hamburgo |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 15 |
Sergipe |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 16 |
São Raimundo RR |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 17 |
Anápolis |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 18 |
Trem |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 19 |
Princesa Solimões |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 20 |
Potiguar Mossoró |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 21 |
Itabaiana |
11 | 5 | 45% |
| 22 |
União Rondonópolis |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 23 |
Altos |
9 | 5 | 56% |
| 24 |
Juazeirense |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 25 |
Sousa |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 26 |
Atlético Cearense |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 27 |
Maringá |
11 | 3 | 27% |
| 28 |
Tocantinópolis |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 29 |
Jacuipense |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 30 |
Água Santa |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 31 |
Santo André |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 32 |
São José EC |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 33 |
Noroeste |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 34 |
Inter de Limeira |
10 | 3 | 30% |
| 35 |
Cianorte |
9 | 7 | 78% |
| 36 |
Iporá |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 37 |
Nova Iguaçu |
9 | 2 | 22% |
| 38 |
Manaus |
9 | 4 | 44% |
| 39 |
Mixto |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 40 |
Serra |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 41 |
Santa Cruz de Natal RN |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 42 |
Avenida |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 43 |
Concórdia AC |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 44 |
Barra FC |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 45 |
Real FC |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 46 |
Cametá |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 47 |
Itabuna Esporte Clube |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 48 |
Petrolina Social Futebol Clube |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 49 |
Patrocinense |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 50 |
Hercílio Luz |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
América RN |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 2 |
ASA |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 3 |
Brasil de Pelotas |
9 | 4 | 44% |
| 4 |
Moto Club MA |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 5 |
Ríver |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 6 |
Águia de Marabá |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 7 |
CRAC |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 8 |
Treze |
10 | 5 | 50% |
| 9 |
Brasiliense |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 10 |
Rio Branco |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 11 |
Ipatinga |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 12 |
Portuguesa RJ |
9 | 4 | 44% |
| 13 |
Maranhão |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 14 |
Novo Hamburgo |
8 | 6 | 75% |
| 15 |
Sergipe |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 16 |
São Raimundo RR |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 17 |
Anápolis |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 18 |
Trem |
7 | 6 | 86% |
| 19 |
Princesa Solimões |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 20 |
Potiguar Mossoró |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 21 |
Itabaiana |
11 | 4 | 36% |
| 22 |
União Rondonópolis |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 23 |
Altos |
9 | 6 | 67% |
| 24 |
Juazeirense |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 25 |
Sousa |
7 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Atlético Cearense |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 27 |
Maringá |
11 | 8 | 73% |
| 28 |
Tocantinópolis |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 29 |
Jacuipense |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 30 |
Água Santa |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 31 |
Santo André |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 32 |
São José EC |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 33 |
Noroeste |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 34 |
Inter de Limeira |
10 | 1 | 10% |
| 35 |
Cianorte |
9 | 4 | 44% |
| 36 |
Iporá |
7 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
Nova Iguaçu |
9 | 3 | 33% |
| 38 |
Manaus |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 39 |
Mixto |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 40 |
Serra |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 41 |
Santa Cruz de Natal RN |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 42 |
Avenida |
8 | 6 | 75% |
| 43 |
Concórdia AC |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 44 |
Barra FC |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 45 |
Real FC |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 46 |
Cametá |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 47 |
Itabuna Esporte Clube |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 48 |
Petrolina Social Futebol Clube |
7 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Patrocinense |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 50 |
Hercílio Luz |
7 | 3 | 43% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Altos and Fluminense PI have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 18 matches played in the Serie D, Altos has scored and conceded goals in 11 matches. In other words, 61% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 56% at home, while it is 67% away from home.
- Meanwhile, Fluminense PI has scored and conceded in 7 of their 14 matches so far in the Serie D, giving them a BTTS rate of 50%. Both teams have scored in 4 of Fluminense PI’s 7 home matches, and it has happened 3 times in 7 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets