Season
Country
Stadium
2025
USA
Al Lang Stadium
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
14 | 64% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
13 | 62% |
3 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
13 | 62% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
12 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
12 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 50% |
11 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 48% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 48% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 48% |
14 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
10 | 48% |
15 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
10 | 45% |
16 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
10 | 45% |
17 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 41% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
8 | 35% |
20 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 32% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 32% |
22 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 32% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
6 | 27% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 24% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 82% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
7 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 70% |
4 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 67% |
5 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 64% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 60% |
9 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
6 | 60% |
11 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 58% |
12 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 55% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 55% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 46% |
16 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
5 | 45% |
17 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 45% |
18 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 42% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 40% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
4 | 36% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
3 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 22% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
4 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
5 | 42% |
11 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
4 | 40% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 36% |
14 |
![]() Lexington |
4 | 36% |
15 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 33% |
17 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 33% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 31% |
19 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 30% |
20 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 30% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
3 | 27% |
22 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
3 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
16 | 76% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
16 | 72% |
3 |
![]() Loudoun United |
15 | 68% |
4 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
15 | 68% |
5 |
![]() Rhode Island |
15 | 68% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
15 | 65% |
7 |
![]() Lexington |
13 | 59% |
8 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
12 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
12 | 54% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
11 | 52% |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
11 | 52% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 52% |
14 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
11 | 52% |
15 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
10 | 45% |
18 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
10 | 45% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
10 | 45% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
9 | 42% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 40% |
22 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
8 | 38% |
23 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
8 | 38% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 36% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
7 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
8 | 72% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
7 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
5 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
5 | 41% |
15 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
4 | 40% |
16 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 40% |
17 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 40% |
18 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
19 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 36% |
20 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
3 | 33% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
3 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 30% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
2 | 18% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 72% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 72% |
5 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
7 | 70% |
6 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 70% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 69% |
8 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 66% |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 66% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 63% |
11 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 63% |
12 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 63% |
13 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 60% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 60% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
7 | 58% |
16 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 55% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 50% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 45% |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
4 | 40% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
23 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
4 | 36% |
24 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
3 | 33% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Tampa Bay Rowdies scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the USL Championship 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Tampa Bay Rowdies is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the USL Championship, Tampa Bay Rowdies has scored before the opponent in 24% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 76%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Tampa Bay Rowdies’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Tampa Bay Rowdies being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.