Season
Country
2015
USA
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
28 | 61% | 50% | 21% |
2 |
![]() Penn FC |
28 | 54% | 46% | 18% |
3 |
![]() Toronto II |
28 | 46% | 25% | 14% |
4 |
![]() Tacoma Defiance |
29 | 45% | 34% | 24% |
5 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
28 | 43% | 32% | 11% |
6 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
29 | 45% | 21% | 3% |
7 |
![]() OKC Energy |
30 | 47% | 30% | 23% |
8 |
![]() LA Galaxy II |
32 | 56% | 38% | 19% |
9 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
29 | 34% | 28% | 24% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
30 | 63% | 43% | 27% |
11 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
28 | 46% | 39% | 25% |
12 |
![]() New York RB II |
30 | 53% | 33% | 23% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
30 | 53% | 33% | 20% |
14 |
![]() Louisville City |
30 | 40% | 23% | 20% |
15 |
![]() Real Monarchs |
28 | 61% | 29% | 21% |
16 |
![]() Saint Louis |
28 | 39% | 29% | 25% |
17 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
29 | 38% | 21% | 7% |
18 |
![]() Portland Timbers II |
28 | 61% | 43% | 14% |
19 |
![]() Orange County |
29 | 48% | 41% | 24% |
20 |
![]() Whitecaps II |
28 | 50% | 32% | 14% |
21 |
![]() Rochester Rhinos |
31 | 61% | 29% | 13% |
22 |
![]() Wilmington Hammerheads |
28 | 43% | 25% | 18% |
23 |
![]() FC Montréal |
28 | 57% | 36% | 25% |
24 |
![]() Austin Aztex FC |
28 | 50% | 29% | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
28 | 68% | 43% | 11% |
2 |
![]() Penn FC |
28 | 64% | 29% | 14% |
3 |
![]() Toronto II |
28 | 46% | 14% | 4% |
4 |
![]() Tacoma Defiance |
29 | 48% | 31% | 14% |
5 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
28 | 57% | 25% | 7% |
6 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
29 | 66% | 21% | 14% |
7 |
![]() OKC Energy |
30 | 57% | 20% | 7% |
8 |
![]() LA Galaxy II |
32 | 69% | 34% | 13% |
9 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
29 | 59% | 28% | 3% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
30 | 60% | 33% | 20% |
11 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
28 | 54% | 32% | 14% |
12 |
![]() New York RB II |
30 | 53% | 10% | 7% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
30 | 57% | 40% | 10% |
14 |
![]() Louisville City |
30 | 50% | 10% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Real Monarchs |
28 | 46% | 29% | 14% |
16 |
![]() Saint Louis |
28 | 39% | 32% | 18% |
17 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
29 | 41% | 24% | 7% |
18 |
![]() Portland Timbers II |
28 | 68% | 32% | 7% |
19 |
![]() Orange County |
29 | 66% | 34% | 17% |
20 |
![]() Whitecaps II |
28 | 46% | 29% | 14% |
21 |
![]() Rochester Rhinos |
31 | 45% | 26% | 10% |
22 |
![]() Wilmington Hammerheads |
28 | 54% | 21% | 11% |
23 |
![]() FC Montréal |
28 | 71% | 54% | 29% |
24 |
![]() Austin Aztex FC |
28 | 50% | 14% | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
28 | 71% | 25% | 18% |
2 |
![]() Penn FC |
28 | 57% | 29% | 7% |
3 |
![]() Toronto II |
28 | 61% | 29% | 7% |
4 |
![]() Tacoma Defiance |
29 | 52% | 28% | 10% |
5 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
28 | 50% | 25% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
29 | 34% | 17% | 3% |
7 |
![]() OKC Energy |
30 | 70% | 37% | 13% |
8 |
![]() LA Galaxy II |
32 | 53% | 28% | 9% |
9 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
29 | 52% | 34% | 14% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
30 | 63% | 40% | 17% |
11 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
28 | 54% | 29% | 18% |
12 |
![]() New York RB II |
30 | 77% | 40% | 30% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
30 | 50% | 23% | 3% |
14 |
![]() Louisville City |
30 | 40% | 23% | 23% |
15 |
![]() Real Monarchs |
28 | 71% | 43% | 21% |
16 |
![]() Saint Louis |
28 | 57% | 21% | 7% |
17 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
29 | 48% | 14% | 3% |
18 |
![]() Portland Timbers II |
28 | 68% | 32% | 7% |
19 |
![]() Orange County |
29 | 48% | 31% | 17% |
20 |
![]() Whitecaps II |
28 | 64% | 32% | 7% |
21 |
![]() Rochester Rhinos |
31 | 55% | 26% | 16% |
22 |
![]() Wilmington Hammerheads |
28 | 43% | 18% | 7% |
23 |
![]() FC Montréal |
28 | 43% | 11% | 4% |
24 |
![]() Austin Aztex FC |
28 | 54% | 29% | 7% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Austin Aztex FC’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 14% of their games played so far in the USL Championship 2015.
And on the other side of the ball, Austin Aztex FC’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 54% of their USL Championship matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Austin Aztex FC this season in the USL Championship:
You can follow the Austin Aztex FC’s card situation in USL Championship all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.