# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
14 | 64% |
2 |
![]() Louisville City |
14 | 64% |
3 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 60% |
4 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
13 | 59% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
12 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
12 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 52% |
9 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 50% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 48% |
12 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
10 | 48% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 48% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 48% |
15 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
10 | 45% |
16 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
10 | 45% |
17 |
![]() Lexington |
10 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 41% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
8 | 35% |
20 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 32% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 32% |
22 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
6 | 27% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 24% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 82% |
2 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
7 | 70% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
8 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
6 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 58% |
11 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 55% |
12 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 55% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 55% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 46% |
17 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
5 | 45% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
4 | 36% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
3 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 22% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 70% |
2 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
4 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
5 | 42% |
11 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 36% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 36% |
14 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
4 | 36% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
4 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 33% |
17 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 33% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 31% |
19 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 30% |
20 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 30% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
3 | 27% |
22 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
3 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
16 | 76% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
16 | 72% |
3 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
16 | 69% |
4 |
![]() Rhode Island |
15 | 68% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
15 | 68% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
15 | 65% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 59% |
8 |
![]() Lexington |
13 | 56% |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
12 | 54% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
11 | 52% |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
11 | 52% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 52% |
14 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
11 | 52% |
15 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
11 | 47% |
18 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
10 | 45% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
10 | 45% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
9 | 42% |
21 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 40% |
22 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 40% |
23 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 36% |
24 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
8 | 36% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
7 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
8 | 72% |
4 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
7 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
8 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
5 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 45% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
5 | 45% |
15 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
5 | 41% |
16 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 40% |
17 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 40% |
18 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 36% |
19 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
20 |
![]() New Mexico United |
3 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
3 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 30% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
2 | 18% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 90% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 72% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 72% |
5 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 70% |
6 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
7 | 70% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 69% |
8 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 66% |
9 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 66% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 63% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 63% |
12 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
7 | 63% |
13 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 63% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 60% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
7 | 58% |
16 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 55% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 50% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 45% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
4 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 40% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
23 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
4 | 36% |
24 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
3 | 30% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from North Carolina FC and Birmingham Legion in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
North Carolina FC has come out and scored the first goal in 59% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 40% of matches.
Meanwhile, Birmingham Legion comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 27% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 72% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.