# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
15 | 65% |
2 |
![]() New Mexico United |
14 | 64% |
3 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
14 | 61% |
4 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
14 | 61% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
13 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
13 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
13 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 52% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
11 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
11 | 48% |
11 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 48% |
12 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
11 | 46% |
13 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
10 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 45% |
15 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 45% |
16 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
10 | 43% |
17 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Lexington |
10 | 42% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 35% |
21 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
6 | 26% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 23% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
10 | 83% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 73% |
3 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 70% |
4 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 70% |
5 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
8 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 58% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 55% |
11 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 55% |
12 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 50% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 46% |
16 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 46% |
17 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 46% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
4 | 36% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 25% |
23 |
![]() Rhode Island |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 64% |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
5 | 42% |
11 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Lexington |
4 | 36% |
14 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
4 | 36% |
15 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Loudoun United |
4 | 33% |
17 |
![]() Orange County |
4 | 33% |
18 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 31% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
17 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
17 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
16 | 69% |
4 |
![]() Rhode Island |
16 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
15 | 65% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
15 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Lexington |
14 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 56% |
9 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
13 | 56% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
12 | 54% |
11 |
![]() San Antonio |
12 | 54% |
12 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
12 | 54% |
13 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
13 | 54% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
12 | 52% |
15 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
12 | 52% |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
11 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
11 | 47% |
18 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
10 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
10 | 43% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
9 | 40% |
21 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 39% |
22 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
9 | 39% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 36% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 34% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
9 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
8 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Miami FC II |
7 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
5 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 45% |
15 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 45% |
16 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
5 | 41% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 40% |
18 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
19 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 36% |
20 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 36% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
3 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 27% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
2 | 16% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 90% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
8 | 72% |
4 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 66% |
8 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 66% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
8 | 66% |
10 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 63% |
12 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 63% |
13 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
7 | 63% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 60% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
7 | 58% |
16 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 50% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 41% |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
4 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
4 | 36% |
23 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
4 | 36% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 33% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from New Mexico United and Monterey Bay in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
New Mexico United has come out and scored the first goal in 64% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 36% of matches.
Meanwhile, Monterey Bay comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 38% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 62% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.