# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
23 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 46 | 18 | +28 | 54 | 2.35 | |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
23 | 16 | 2 | 5 | 47 | 24 | +23 | 50 | 2.17 | |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
23 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 38 | 26 | +12 | 43 | 1.87 | |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
22 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 33 | 17 | +16 | 37 | 1.68 | |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
23 | 11 | 4 | 8 | 37 | 35 | +2 | 37 | 1.61 | |
6 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
22 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 34 | 32 | +2 | 33 | 1.50 | |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
23 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 33 | 27 | +6 | 32 | 1.39 | |
8 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
22 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 37 | 32 | +5 | 32 | 1.45 | |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
23 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 29 | 26 | +3 | 32 | 1.39 | |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 23 | 21 | +2 | 31 | 1.35 | |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 25 | 29 | -4 | 31 | 1.35 | |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 29 | 30 | -1 | 30 | 1.36 | |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 26 | 28 | -2 | 30 | 1.36 | |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
23 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 38 | 40 | -2 | 30 | 1.30 | |
15 |
![]() New Mexico United |
21 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 27 | 30 | -3 | 30 | 1.43 | |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
21 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 28 | 1.33 | |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
23 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 36 | 42 | -6 | 26 | 1.13 | |
18 |
![]() Rhode Island |
23 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 16 | 24 | -8 | 24 | 1.04 | |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
24 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 24 | 32 | -8 | 24 | 1.00 | |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
22 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 25 | 34 | -9 | 24 | 1.09 | |
21 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
23 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 18 | 39 | -21 | 24 | 1.04 | |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
23 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 29 | 38 | -9 | 22 | 0.96 | |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
22 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 24 | 34 | -10 | 21 | 0.95 | |
24 |
![]() Miami FC II |
23 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 22 | 38 | -16 | 20 | 0.87 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 7 | +16 | 27 | 2.45 | |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 9 | +20 | 30 | 2.73 | |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 14 | +7 | 24 | 2.00 | |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
11 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 18 | 9 | +9 | 18 | 1.64 | |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 14 | +8 | 23 | 2.09 | |
6 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 20 | 1.82 | |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 17 | 10 | +7 | 18 | 1.38 | |
8 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 17 | +8 | 18 | 1.64 | |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 9 | +7 | 19 | 1.73 | |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 9 | +6 | 21 | 1.91 | |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 22 | 1.83 | |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 17 | 1.70 | |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 14 | +1 | 16 | 1.33 | |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 21 | 17 | +4 | 14 | 1.27 | |
15 |
![]() New Mexico United |
9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 14 | 1.56 | |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 18 | +7 | 20 | 2.00 | |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 21 | 23 | -2 | 15 | 1.25 | |
18 |
![]() Rhode Island |
12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 14 | 1.17 | |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 17 | 1.70 | |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 11 | 0.92 | |
21 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 17 | 1.31 | |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 10 | 0.83 | |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 11 | 1.10 | |
24 |
![]() Miami FC II |
13 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 12 | 0.92 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 23 | 11 | +12 | 27 | 2.25 | |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 15 | +3 | 20 | 1.67 | |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 17 | 12 | +5 | 19 | 1.73 | |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 8 | +7 | 19 | 1.73 | |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 14 | 1.17 | |
6 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 13 | 1.18 | |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 14 | 1.40 | |
8 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 14 | 1.27 | |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 13 | 1.08 | |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 10 | 0.83 | |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 18 | -9 | 9 | 0.82 | |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 17 | 22 | -5 | 13 | 1.08 | |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 14 | 1.40 | |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 17 | 23 | -6 | 16 | 1.33 | |
15 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 16 | 1.33 | |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 8 | 0.73 | |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 11 | 1.00 | |
18 |
![]() Rhode Island |
11 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 10 | 0.91 | |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
14 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 7 | 0.50 | |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 19 | -2 | 13 | 1.30 | |
21 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 24 | -18 | 7 | 0.70 | |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
11 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 20 | 23 | -3 | 12 | 1.09 | |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 10 | 0.83 | |
24 |
![]() Miami FC II |
10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 18 | -9 | 8 | 0.80 |
At the moment, Miami FC II is in 24th in the USL Championship. In 23 matches, Miami FC II has 5 wins, 5 draws, and 13 losses.
The club has picked up 20 points (adding up all matches, including knockout matches). So based on points per match, they have picked up 0.87 points per match to date in the tournament.
Here are more stats from Miami FC II’s campaign at home in the USL Championship below:
If we only look at Miami FC II’s away matches, this is their current record:
As for Tulsa Roughnecks’s campaign, they sit in 3rd in the competition table and this is the current state of their USL Championship campaign:
As a result, Tulsa Roughnecks has, in terms of the overall campaign, the 3th position on the leaderboard. When Tulsa Roughnecks plays as home team, the situation is as follows: 12 games, 7 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses.
Now, when playing away from home, Tulsa Roughnecks adds:
The competition table helps provide an overview of the teams’ performance during the current campaign and helps identify patterns, trends, and statistics relevant to analysing Miami FC II vs Tulsa Roughnecks.
With this data, you can check each club’s goal production, their position in the table, their goal difference, and other factors that can be useful for predicting the outcome of the match.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.