Over Under Goals: Chattanooga FC 2 - 0 LA Force
Tue, 22 September 2020 - 20:00
Stadium: Keyworth Stadium (Hamtramck, Michigan)
Finished
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 3 | 43% | 33% | 50% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 10 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 9 | 41% | 36% | 45% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 7 | 39% | 40% | 38% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 2 | 18% | 17% | 20% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 8 | 42% | 13% | 64% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 4 | 57% | 80% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 8 | 50% | 63% | 38% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 6 | 55% | 50% | 57% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 11 | 61% | 63% | 60% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 6 | 55% | 80% | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 5 | 71% | 67% | 75% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 18 | 90% | 83% | 100% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 18 | 82% | 82% | 82% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 16 | 89% | 90% | 88% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 9 | 82% | 83% | 80% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 18 | 95% | 88% | 100% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 14 | 88% | 100% | 75% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 17 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 9 | 82% | 100% | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 5 | 71% | 67% | 75% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 16 | 80% | 75% | 88% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 13 | 59% | 55% | 64% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 13 | 72% | 80% | 63% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 5 | 45% | 50% | 40% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 14 | 74% | 63% | 82% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 6 | 86% | 80% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 13 | 81% | 88% | 75% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 8 | 73% | 75% | 71% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 13 | 72% | 63% | 80% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 8 | 73% | 100% | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 1 | 14% | 0% | 25% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 3 | 15% | 17% | 13% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 2 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 2 | 11% | 20% | 0% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 1 | 9% | 17% | 0% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 4 | 21% | 0% | 36% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 1 | 14% | 20% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 3 | 19% | 38% | 0% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 5 | 45% | 50% | 43% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 5 | 28% | 25% | 30% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 3 | 27% | 20% | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 3 | 15% | 17% | 13% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 1 | 5% | 9% | 0% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 4 | 21% | 0% | 36% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 1 | 14% | 20% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 2 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 1 | 9% | 25% | 0% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 3 | 17% | 13% | 20% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 1 | 9% | 0% | 17% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 1 | 5% | 9% | 0% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 10% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 4 | 57% | 67% | 50% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 10 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 13 | 59% | 64% | 55% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 11 | 61% | 60% | 63% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 9 | 82% | 83% | 80% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 11 | 58% | 88% | 36% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 3 | 43% | 20% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 8 | 50% | 38% | 63% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 5 | 45% | 50% | 43% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 7 | 39% | 38% | 40% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 5 | 45% | 20% | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 2 | 29% | 33% | 25% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 2 | 10% | 17% | 0% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 4 | 18% | 18% | 18% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 2 | 11% | 10% | 13% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 2 | 18% | 17% | 20% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 1 | 5% | 13% | 0% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 2 | 13% | 0% | 25% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 2 | 18% | 0% | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 2 | 29% | 33% | 25% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 4 | 20% | 25% | 13% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 9 | 41% | 45% | 36% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 5 | 28% | 20% | 38% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 6 | 55% | 50% | 60% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 5 | 26% | 38% | 18% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 1 | 14% | 20% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 3 | 19% | 13% | 25% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 3 | 27% | 25% | 29% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 5 | 28% | 38% | 20% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 3 | 27% | 0% | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 6 | 86% | 100% | 75% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 17 | 85% | 83% | 88% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 20 | 91% | 91% | 91% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 16 | 89% | 80% | 100% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 10 | 91% | 83% | 100% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 15 | 79% | 100% | 64% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 6 | 86% | 80% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 13 | 81% | 63% | 100% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 6 | 55% | 50% | 57% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 13 | 72% | 75% | 70% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 8 | 73% | 80% | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 17 | 85% | 83% | 88% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 21 | 95% | 91% | 100% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 18 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 15 | 79% | 100% | 64% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 6 | 86% | 80% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 14 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 10 | 91% | 75% | 100% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 15 | 83% | 88% | 80% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 10 | 91% | 100% | 83% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 20 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 21 | 95% | 91% | 100% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 18 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 19 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 17 | 94% | 100% | 90% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
You can check out how often Chattanooga FC and LA Force matches in the NISA go over or under a certain number of goals on this page. This is a handy tool to help predict how many goals they could potentially score when they meet in their upcoming match.
Here is an example of what we mean:
80% of Chattanooga FC’s matches in the NISA have had more than 1.5 goals scored. And when we raise the line of total goals to 2.5, then the rate of matches that go over that number is 50%.
You can also check how many times the total has gone under. In LA Force’s case, 26% of their matches have seen under 1.5 goals scored. And in terms of matches with under 2.5 goals, the rate is 58%.
You can also see whether Chattanooga FC and LA Force matches go over or under a total number of goals when playing at home, away, or overall in NISA.
The over/under goal analysis for Chattanooga FC vs LA Force offers valuable insights into each club's playing styles as well as a reasonable estimation of goals we could see in the match.
However, predicting the number of goals in a match does not always go the way the math says it will. It’s important to always consider other factors as well in order to get the best chance of making an accurate prediction.