Favourite this Match
Chattanooga FC Team Logo

Goals: Chattanooga FC 2 - 0 LA Force

Tue, 22 September 2020 - 20:00

Stadium: Keyworth Stadium (Hamtramck, Michigan)

Finished

LA Force Team Logo

Goals

# Team MP Goal Scored Avg. Overall Avg. Home Avg. Away
1
NY Cosmos logo

NY Cosmos

7 6 0.86 0.67 1
2
Chattanooga FC logo

Chattanooga FC

20 28 1.4 1.5 1.25
3
Detroit City FC logo

Detroit City FC

22 33 1.5 1.55 1.45
4
Michigan Stars logo

Michigan Stars

18 19 1.06 1.2 0.88
5
Stumptown Athletic logo

Stumptown Athletic

11 10 0.91 1 0.8
6
LA Force logo

LA Force

19 23 1.21 0.75 1.55
7
Oakland Roots logo

Oakland Roots

7 12 1.71 1.8 1.5
8
California Utd Strikers logo

California Utd Strikers

16 22 1.38 1.88 0.88
9
San Diego 1904 logo

San Diego 1904

11 11 1 1 1
10
New Amsterdam logo

New Amsterdam

18 12 0.67 0.5 0.8
11
Maryland Bobcats logo

Maryland Bobcats

11 13 1.18 1.4 1
# Team MP Goal Scored Avg. Home
1
NY Cosmos logo

NY Cosmos

3 2 0.67
2
Chattanooga FC logo

Chattanooga FC

12 18 1.5
3
Detroit City FC logo

Detroit City FC

11 17 1.55
4
Michigan Stars logo

Michigan Stars

10 12 1.2
5
Stumptown Athletic logo

Stumptown Athletic

6 6 1
6
LA Force logo

LA Force

8 6 0.75
7
Oakland Roots logo

Oakland Roots

5 9 1.8
8
California Utd Strikers logo

California Utd Strikers

8 15 1.88
9
San Diego 1904 logo

San Diego 1904

4 4 1
10
New Amsterdam logo

New Amsterdam

8 4 0.5
11
Maryland Bobcats logo

Maryland Bobcats

5 7 1.4
# Team MP Goal Scored Avg. Away
1
NY Cosmos logo

NY Cosmos

4 4 1
2
Chattanooga FC logo

Chattanooga FC

8 10 1.25
3
Detroit City FC logo

Detroit City FC

11 16 1.45
4
Michigan Stars logo

Michigan Stars

8 7 0.88
5
Stumptown Athletic logo

Stumptown Athletic

5 4 0.8
6
LA Force logo

LA Force

11 17 1.55
7
Oakland Roots logo

Oakland Roots

2 3 1.5
8
California Utd Strikers logo

California Utd Strikers

8 7 0.88
9
San Diego 1904 logo

San Diego 1904

7 7 1
10
New Amsterdam logo

New Amsterdam

10 8 0.8
11
Maryland Bobcats logo

Maryland Bobcats

6 6 1
# Team MP Goals Conceded Avg. Overall Avg. Home Avg. Away
1
NY Cosmos logo

NY Cosmos

7 8 1.14 1 1.25
2
Chattanooga FC logo

Chattanooga FC

20 22 1.1 0.92 1.38
3
Detroit City FC logo

Detroit City FC

22 11 0.5 0.45 0.55
4
Michigan Stars logo

Michigan Stars

18 19 1.06 1.1 1
5
Stumptown Athletic logo

Stumptown Athletic

11 7 0.64 0.67 0.6
6
LA Force logo

LA Force

19 25 1.32 0.88 1.64
7
Oakland Roots logo

Oakland Roots

7 7 1 1.2 0.5
8
California Utd Strikers logo

California Utd Strikers

16 18 1.13 1.25 1
9
San Diego 1904 logo

San Diego 1904

11 20 1.82 2 1.71
10
New Amsterdam logo

New Amsterdam

18 38 2.11 2 2.2
11
Maryland Bobcats logo

Maryland Bobcats

11 14 1.27 1.6 1
# Team MP Goals Conceded Avg. Home
1
NY Cosmos Team Logo

NY Cosmos

3 3 1
2
Chattanooga FC Team Logo

Chattanooga FC

12 11 0.92
3
Detroit City FC Team Logo

Detroit City FC

11 5 0.45
4
Michigan Stars Team Logo

Michigan Stars

10 11 1.1
5
Stumptown Athletic Team Logo

Stumptown Athletic

6 4 0.67
6
LA Force Team Logo

LA Force

8 7 0.88
7
Oakland Roots Team Logo

Oakland Roots

5 6 1.2
8
California Utd Strikers Team Logo

California Utd Strikers

8 10 1.25
9
San Diego 1904 Team Logo

San Diego 1904

4 8 2
10
New Amsterdam Team Logo

New Amsterdam

8 16 2
11
Maryland Bobcats Team Logo

Maryland Bobcats

5 8 1.6
# Team MP Goals Conceded Avg. Away
1
NY Cosmos logo

NY Cosmos

4 5 1.25
2
Chattanooga FC logo

Chattanooga FC

8 11 1.38
3
Detroit City FC logo

Detroit City FC

11 6 0.55
4
Michigan Stars logo

Michigan Stars

8 8 1
5
Stumptown Athletic logo

Stumptown Athletic

5 3 0.6
6
LA Force logo

LA Force

11 18 1.64
7
Oakland Roots logo

Oakland Roots

2 1 0.5
8
California Utd Strikers logo

California Utd Strikers

8 8 1
9
San Diego 1904 logo

San Diego 1904

7 12 1.71
10
New Amsterdam logo

New Amsterdam

10 22 2.2
11
Maryland Bobcats logo

Maryland Bobcats

6 6 1

This section breaks down the goal statistics of Chattanooga FC and LA Force in the NISA. This information is crucial in better understanding how the two teams’ offences and defences have performed during the current campaign.

In terms of how Chattanooga FC has performed with scoring and conceding goals in the NISA, here’s a quick summary:

Goals scored - Chattanooga FC in NISA

  • Chattanooga FC has scored 28 goals in 20 matches for an average of 1.4 goals scored per match.
  • As the home side, Chattanooga FC has scored 18 goals in their 12 home matches in the NISA, resulting in 1.5 goals per match at home.
  • And as the visiting side, Chattanooga FC has 10 goals scored in 8 away matches for an average of 1.25 goals scored per away match.

Goals conceded - Chattanooga FC in NISA

  • Defensively, Chattanooga FC has conceded 22 goals in 20 matches, giving them an average of 1.1 goals conceded per match.
  • At home, Chattanooga FC has given up 11 goals in 12 matches for an average of 0.92 goals conceded per home match.
  • And away from home, their record is 11 goals given up in 8 matches, resulting in 1.38 goals conceded per away contest.

For LA Force, this is how many goals they have scored and conceded:

Goals scored - LA Force in NISA

  • LA Force has scored 23 goals in 19 matches played, giving them an average of 1.21 goals scored per match in this campaign.
  • As the away team, LA Force has scored 17 times in 11 for an average of 1.55 goals scored per match.
  • And at their home ground, LA Force has 6 in 8 home matches, which comes out to an average of 0.75 goals scored per match.

Goals conceded - LA Force in NISA

  • LA Force’s defence has let in a total of 25 goals in 19 matches thus far. As a result, they are averaging 1.32 goals conceded per match.
  • Away from home, LA Force has conceded 18 goals in 11 matches. That gives them an average of 1.64 goals given up per away match.
  • On home soil, meanwhile, LA Force has the following stats: 8 matches, 7 goals surrendered for an average of 0.88 goals conceded per match.