# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
15 | 65% |
2 |
![]() One Knoxville |
14 | 64% |
3 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
13 | 59% |
4 |
![]() Naples |
13 | 54% |
5 |
![]() Westchester SC |
13 | 54% |
6 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
12 | 50% |
7 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
11 | 46% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
10 | 45% |
9 |
![]() AV Alta |
10 | 42% |
10 |
![]() Texoma |
10 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
9 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
8 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Forward Madison |
8 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
7 | 33% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
8 | 89% |
2 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
8 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Texoma |
8 | 62% |
4 |
![]() Westchester SC |
7 | 58% |
5 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
7 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
7 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
6 | 55% |
9 |
![]() AV Alta |
7 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
4 | 44% |
13 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
5 | 42% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
5 | 42% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
8 | 73% |
2 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
6 | 60% |
3 |
![]() Naples |
7 | 58% |
4 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 50% |
6 |
![]() One Knoxville |
6 | 46% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 38% |
8 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
4 | 33% |
9 |
![]() AV Alta |
3 | 27% |
10 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
3 | 27% |
11 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
3 | 25% |
12 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 25% |
13 |
![]() Texoma |
2 | 18% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
1 | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
16 | 66% |
2 |
![]() Forward Madison |
16 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
14 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
13 | 59% |
5 |
![]() Texoma |
14 | 58% |
6 |
![]() AV Alta |
14 | 58% |
7 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
13 | 54% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
12 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
12 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Westchester SC |
11 | 45% |
11 |
![]() Naples |
11 | 45% |
12 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
9 | 40% |
13 |
![]() One Knoxville |
8 | 36% |
14 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
8 | 34% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
7 | 58% |
2 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
7 | 58% |
3 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
5 | 55% |
4 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 50% |
6 |
![]() AV Alta |
6 | 46% |
7 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
5 | 45% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
4 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Westchester SC |
5 | 41% |
10 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
5 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
5 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Texoma |
5 | 38% |
13 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
4 | 33% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
1 | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Forward Madison |
9 | 90% |
2 |
![]() Texoma |
9 | 81% |
3 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
9 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
9 | 75% |
5 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
8 | 72% |
6 |
![]() AV Alta |
8 | 72% |
7 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
8 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
8 | 61% |
9 |
![]() One Knoxville |
7 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 50% |
11 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 41% |
13 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 40% |
14 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
3 | 27% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Charlotte Independence and Greenville Triumph in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Charlotte Independence has come out and scored the first goal in 50% of the matches they have played so far in the USL League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 50% of matches.
Meanwhile, Greenville Triumph comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 33% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 66% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.