# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
15 | 65% |
2 |
![]() New Mexico United |
13 | 62% |
3 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
14 | 61% |
4 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
13 | 59% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
13 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
13 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
13 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 52% |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
11 | 48% |
10 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 48% |
11 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 48% |
12 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
11 | 48% |
13 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
10 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 45% |
15 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 45% |
16 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 45% |
17 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
10 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Lexington |
10 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 35% |
21 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
6 | 26% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 23% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 82% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 70% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
8 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 58% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 55% |
11 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 55% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 50% |
15 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 46% |
17 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 46% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
4 | 36% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 25% |
23 |
![]() Rhode Island |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 64% |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
5 | 42% |
11 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Lexington |
4 | 36% |
13 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
4 | 36% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 36% |
15 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 36% |
17 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 33% |
18 |
![]() Loudoun United |
4 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 27% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
17 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
17 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
16 | 69% |
4 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
16 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
15 | 65% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
15 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Lexington |
13 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 56% |
9 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
12 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
12 | 54% |
11 |
![]() San Antonio |
12 | 54% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
12 | 54% |
13 |
![]() Miami FC II |
12 | 52% |
14 |
![]() Orange County |
11 | 52% |
15 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 52% |
16 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
12 | 52% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
11 | 47% |
18 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
10 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
10 | 43% |
20 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
9 | 40% |
22 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
9 | 39% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 38% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 34% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
9 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
8 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Miami FC II |
7 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
5 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 45% |
15 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 45% |
16 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
5 | 41% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 40% |
18 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
19 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 36% |
20 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 36% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
3 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 27% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
2 | 18% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 90% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Orange County |
8 | 72% |
4 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
8 | 72% |
5 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 66% |
9 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 63% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 63% |
12 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 63% |
13 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
7 | 63% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 60% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
7 | 58% |
16 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 50% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 41% |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
4 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
4 | 36% |
23 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
4 | 36% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 33% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Charleston Battery and Pittsburgh Riverhounds in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Charleston Battery has come out and scored the first goal in 57% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 43% of matches.
Meanwhile, Pittsburgh Riverhounds comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 48% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 52% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.