Favoritar esse Jogo

Escanteios: BIT 0 - 2 Suzhou Dongwu

sáb, 13 agosto 2022 - 08:30

Local: Beijing Institute of Technology Eastern Athletic Field

Finalizados

Tabela Escanteios Cartões 1º Tempo 2º Tempo Mais/Menos gols Sem Sofrer Gols BTTS Jogos a marcar/Jogos a sofrer gol primeiro

#	Equipe	J	Acima de 7.5	Acima de 8.5	Acima de 9.5	Acima de 10.5	Acima de 11.5	Acima de 12.5	Acima de 13.5	Média
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	65%	56%	47%	38%	18%	12%	6%	9.06
2	Nanjing City	34	59%	53%	35%	32%	21%	12%	3%	8.94
3	Kunshan	34	62%	56%	44%	35%	21%	9%	6%	8.79
4	Shenzhen	34	56%	41%	38%	35%	21%	18%	12%	8.7
5	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	59%	56%	41%	32%	21%	15%	3%	8.63
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	62%	53%	38%	32%	24%	9%	6%	8.62
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	53%	47%	41%	32%	29%	18%	12%	8.55
8	Suzhou Dongwu	34	59%	50%	38%	26%	21%	6%	0%	8.44
9	Shenyang Urban	34	56%	41%	29%	26%	18%	18%	9%	8.37
10	Shijiazhuang Gongfu	34	53%	44%	29%	26%	24%	12%	12%	8.25
11	Nantong Zhiyun	34	56%	47%	24%	18%	12%	12%	6%	8.14
12	Guangxi Baoyun	34	47%	41%	29%	26%	12%	6%	3%	8.03
13	Shanghai Jiading	34	41%	35%	32%	24%	18%	9%	3%	7.84
14	Qingdao Hainiu	34	50%	35%	29%	18%	12%	6%	3%	7.82
15	Beijing BG	34	47%	35%	18%	15%	12%	6%	6%	7.65
16	Zibo Cuju	34	44%	35%	18%	15%	6%	3%	0%	7.54
17	BIT	34	38%	35%	29%	15%	12%	6%	6%	7.44
18	Qingdao Youth Island	34	35%	26%	21%	12%	3%	3%	0%	6.92

#	Equipe	J	Acima de 7.5	Acima de 8.5	Acima de 9.5	Acima de 10.5	Acima de 11.5	Acima de 12.5	Acima de 13.5	Média
1	Shenzhen	17	76%	47%	47%	41%	18%	18%	12%	9.76
2	Nanjing City	17	59%	59%	47%	41%	29%	18%	6%	9.3
3	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	71%	71%	59%	53%	12%	6%	0%	9.23
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59%	59%	47%	35%	29%	24%	0%	8.83
5	Shenyang Urban	17	65%	41%	35%	35%	18%	18%	12%	8.82
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	53%	41%	29%	29%	12%	6%	8.77
7	Qingdao Hainiu	17	65%	47%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	8.77
8	Kunshan	17	53%	47%	35%	35%	24%	6%	0%	8.62
9	Nantong Zhiyun	17	59%	53%	29%	24%	12%	12%	6%	8.53
10	Shanghai Jiading	17	53%	41%	41%	29%	24%	6%	6%	8.51
11	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	47%	41%	29%	24%	24%	12%	6%	8.12
12	Suzhou Dongwu	17	47%	41%	35%	12%	6%	0%	0%	7.76
13	Guangxi Baoyun	17	47%	35%	18%	18%	12%	6%	6%	7.69
14	Zibo Cuju	17	47%	41%	18%	12%	12%	6%	0%	7.53
15	Beijing BG	17	41%	35%	18%	18%	18%	12%	12%	7.47
16	BIT	17	35%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	6.88
17	Shijiazhuang Gongfu	17	29%	29%	18%	12%	12%	12%	12%	6.6
18	Qingdao Youth Island	17	24%	18%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	6.36

#	Equipe	J	Acima de 7.5	Acima de 8.5	Acima de 9.5	Acima de 10.5	Acima de 11.5	Acima de 12.5	Acima de 13.5	Média
1	Shijiazhuang Gongfu	17	76%	59%	41%	41%	35%	12%	12%	9.7
2	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	59%	41%	41%	35%	12%	0%	9.12
3	Kunshan	17	71%	65%	53%	35%	18%	12%	12%	8.95
4	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	53%	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	8.94
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	59%	41%	35%	24%	24%	18%	12%	8.88
6	Nanjing City	17	59%	47%	24%	24%	12%	6%	0%	8.56
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	53%	35%	35%	18%	6%	6%	8.47
8	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59%	53%	35%	29%	12%	6%	6%	8.44
9	Guangxi Baoyun	17	47%	47%	41%	35%	12%	6%	0%	8.38
10	BIT	17	41%	41%	41%	18%	18%	6%	6%	8
11	Shenyang Urban	17	47%	41%	24%	18%	18%	18%	6%	7.94
12	Beijing BG	17	53%	35%	18%	12%	6%	0%	0%	7.82
13	Nantong Zhiyun	17	53%	41%	18%	12%	12%	12%	6%	7.76
14	Shenzhen	17	35%	35%	29%	29%	24%	18%	12%	7.64
15	Zibo Cuju	17	41%	29%	18%	18%	0%	0%	0%	7.56
16	Qingdao Youth Island	17	47%	35%	35%	18%	6%	6%	0%	7.47
17	Shanghai Jiading	17	29%	29%	24%	18%	12%	12%	0%	7.24
18	Qingdao Hainiu	17	35%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	6.73

#	Equipe	J	Acima de 2.5	Acima de 3.5	Acima de 4.5	Acima de 5.5	Acima de 6.5	Acima de 7.5	Acima de 8.5	Média
1	Shenzhen	34	79%	68%	56%	47%	32%	26%	21%	5.41
2	Nantong Zhiyun	34	88%	71%	56%	44%	32%	18%	12%	5.29
3	Kunshan	34	82%	71%	53%	41%	35%	21%	9%	5.27
4	Nanjing City	34	85%	56%	53%	35%	26%	21%	12%	5
5	Qingdao Hainiu	34	74%	62%	59%	41%	24%	12%	6%	4.91
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	65%	62%	47%	26%	21%	21%	18%	4.61
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	56%	44%	41%	24%	18%	9%	4.5
8	Suzhou Dongwu	34	76%	62%	53%	24%	12%	9%	6%	4.47
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	76%	65%	47%	32%	12%	3%	3%	4.3
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	65%	47%	35%	24%	18%	9%	6%	4.03
11	Shijiazhuang Gongfu	34	62%	44%	32%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3.72
12	Qingdao Youth Island	34	56%	44%	35%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3.68
13	Shenyang Urban	34	68%	47%	32%	18%	9%	6%	3%	3.67
14	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	62%	38%	24%	12%	9%	9%	6%	3.48
15	Shanghai Jiading	34	53%	35%	29%	18%	12%	6%	3%	3.39
16	Zibo Cuju	34	53%	41%	24%	12%	6%	6%	0%	3.18
17	Beijing BG	34	44%	32%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47
18	BIT	34	47%	21%	21%	6%	6%	3%	0%	2.41

#	Equipe	J	Acima de 2.5	Acima de 3.5	Acima de 4.5	Acima de 5.5	Acima de 6.5	Acima de 7.5	Acima de 8.5	Média
1	Shenzhen	17	94%	76%	59%	47%	35%	35%	24%	6
2	Nantong Zhiyun	17	94%	82%	59%	47%	35%	18%	18%	5.71
3	Qingdao Hainiu	17	82%	71%	71%	53%	35%	18%	12%	5.53
4	Kunshan	17	76%	65%	53%	41%	41%	24%	6%	5.31
5	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	59%	53%	53%	29%	29%	18%	5.24
6	Nanjing City	17	82%	59%	59%	41%	35%	29%	12%	5.18
7	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	76%	76%	65%	41%	18%	6%	6%	4.88
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	59%	41%	24%	18%	18%	18%	4.56
9	Shanghai Jiading	17	59%	59%	47%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.13
10	Shenyang Urban	17	76%	47%	41%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
11	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	59%	53%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
12	Guangxi Baoyun	17	59%	35%	29%	24%	18%	12%	6%	3.63
13	Qingdao Youth Island	17	47%	41%	35%	29%	6%	6%	0%	3.24
14	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59%	29%	12%	6%	6%	6%	6%	3.12
15	Shijiazhuang Gongfu	17	41%	24%	12%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.53
16	Beijing BG	17	41%	29%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47
17	Zibo Cuju	17	47%	29%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.41
18	BIT	17	41%	24%	24%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.13

#	Equipe	J	Acima de 2.5	Acima de 3.5	Acima de 4.5	Acima de 5.5	Acima de 6.5	Acima de 7.5	Acima de 8.5	Média
1	Kunshan	17	88%	76%	53%	41%	29%	18%	12%	5.24
2	Suzhou Dongwu	17	82%	65%	53%	29%	18%	18%	12%	5.06
3	Nantong Zhiyun	17	82%	59%	53%	41%	29%	18%	6%	4.88
4	Shenzhen	17	65%	59%	53%	47%	29%	18%	18%	4.82
5	Nanjing City	17	88%	53%	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.81
6	Shijiazhuang Gongfu	17	82%	65%	53%	41%	18%	12%	6%	4.76
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	65%	53%	29%	24%	24%	18%	4.65
8	Guangxi Baoyun	17	71%	59%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.44
9	Qingdao Hainiu	17	65%	53%	47%	29%	12%	6%	0%	4.2
10	Qingdao Youth Island	17	65%	47%	35%	24%	24%	12%	6%	4.12
11	Zibo Cuju	17	59%	53%	41%	24%	12%	12%	0%	4
12	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	65%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.88
13	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	53%	35%	29%	18%	6%	0%	3.76
14	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	76%	53%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	3.69
15	Shenyang Urban	17	59%	47%	24%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.47
16	Shanghai Jiading	17	47%	12%	12%	12%	6%	6%	0%	2.71
17	BIT	17	53%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.69
18	Beijing BG	17	47%	35%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47

#	Equipe	J	Acima de 2.5	Acima de 3.5	Acima de 4.5	Acima de 5.5	Acima de 6.5	Acima de 7.5	Acima de 8.5	Média
1	Beijing BG	34	74%	71%	56%	44%	38%	26%	12%	5.18
2	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	82%	68%	53%	47%	26%	24%	12%	5.15
3	BIT	34	71%	62%	50%	38%	26%	15%	15%	5.03
4	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	82%	65%	56%	32%	18%	9%	6%	4.76
5	Shenyang Urban	34	71%	50%	44%	35%	26%	24%	12%	4.7
6	Shijiazhuang Gongfu	34	68%	44%	38%	32%	26%	21%	15%	4.53
7	Shanghai Jiading	34	76%	53%	44%	29%	15%	9%	6%	4.45
8	Zibo Cuju	34	71%	56%	47%	26%	21%	12%	6%	4.36
9	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	53%	44%	35%	15%	9%	6%	4.12
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	62%	53%	41%	26%	15%	9%	3%	4
11	Suzhou Dongwu	34	65%	53%	50%	26%	21%	9%	3%	3.97
12	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	59%	41%	29%	21%	18%	15%	12%	3.94
13	Nanjing City	34	68%	53%	35%	26%	9%	3%	3%	3.94
14	Kunshan	34	65%	53%	29%	9%	6%	6%	3%	3.52
15	Shenzhen	34	65%	38%	26%	15%	12%	3%	0%	3.29
16	Qingdao Youth Island	34	62%	44%	26%	15%	6%	3%	0%	3.24
17	Qingdao Hainiu	34	50%	32%	26%	6%	3%	3%	0%	2.91
18	Nantong Zhiyun	34	47%	32%	21%	15%	6%	6%	6%	2.85

#	Equipe	J	Acima de 2.5	Acima de 3.5	Acima de 4.5	Acima de 5.5	Acima de 6.5	Acima de 7.5	Acima de 8.5	Média
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	88%	71%	59%	59%	35%	29%	24%	5.71
2	Zibo Cuju	17	76%	71%	59%	41%	29%	24%	12%	5.12
3	Beijing BG	17	71%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	18%	5
4	Shenyang Urban	17	76%	59%	53%	35%	24%	24%	6%	4.94
5	BIT	17	71%	59%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	4.75
6	Shanghai Jiading	17	71%	53%	47%	35%	12%	6%	6%	4.38
7	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	59%	47%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.35
8	Nanjing City	17	71%	59%	41%	29%	18%	6%	6%	4.12
9	Shijiazhuang Gongfu	17	59%	41%	35%	29%	24%	12%	6%	4.07
10	Guangxi Baoyun	17	71%	59%	47%	18%	12%	6%	0%	4.06
11	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	53%	47%	29%	18%	6%	0%	3.88
12	Shenzhen	17	71%	47%	29%	18%	18%	6%	0%	3.76
13	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	29%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.56
14	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	41%	29%	29%	12%	0%	0%	3.53
15	Kunshan	17	59%	53%	24%	6%	6%	6%	0%	3.31
16	Qingdao Hainiu	17	59%	35%	29%	6%	6%	6%	0%	3.24
17	Qingdao Youth Island	17	65%	41%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	3.12
18	Nantong Zhiyun	17	47%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	2.82

#	Equipe	J	Acima de 2.5	Acima de 3.5	Acima de 4.5	Acima de 5.5	Acima de 6.5	Acima de 7.5	Acima de 8.5	Média
1	Beijing BG	17	76%	76%	65%	53%	47%	29%	6%	5.35
2	BIT	17	71%	65%	53%	41%	35%	18%	18%	5.31
3	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	71%	65%	41%	18%	6%	6%	5.19
4	Shijiazhuang Gongfu	17	76%	47%	41%	35%	29%	29%	24%	4.94
5	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	71%	65%	59%	41%	18%	18%	12%	4.71
6	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	76%	65%	47%	35%	18%	18%	0%	4.56
7	Shanghai Jiading	17	82%	53%	41%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.53
8	Shenyang Urban	17	65%	41%	35%	35%	29%	24%	18%	4.47
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	53%	41%	24%	24%	18%	18%	4.29
10	Suzhou Dongwu	17	59%	53%	53%	24%	24%	12%	6%	4.06
11	Guangxi Baoyun	17	53%	47%	35%	35%	18%	12%	6%	3.94
12	Nanjing City	17	65%	47%	29%	24%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
13	Kunshan	17	71%	53%	35%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3.71
14	Zibo Cuju	17	65%	41%	35%	12%	12%	0%	0%	3.56
15	Qingdao Youth Island	17	59%	47%	29%	12%	12%	6%	0%	3.35
16	Nantong Zhiyun	17	47%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	6%	2.88
17	Shenzhen	17	59%	29%	24%	12%	6%	0%	0%	2.82
18	Qingdao Hainiu	17	41%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.53

Saber as média de escanteios para BIT x Suzhou Dongwu pode fazer uma tremenda diferença para sua análise, principalmente se você gosta de esmiuçar números para entender como o jogo pode se desenrolar dentro dos 90 minutos.

Os jogos do BIT tem, em média, 7.44 escanteios por jogo. Dessa média, 2.41 são a favor. Ou seja, com essa informação você pode saber qual é o poder ofensivo da equipe para este jogo.

Também vale destacar que BIT concede ao adversário, em média, 5.03 por jogo.

Agora, falando de Suzhou Dongwu, a situação é a seguinte:

Média de escanteios em jogos envolvendo Suzhou Dongwu: 8.44
Média de cantos a favor: 4.47
Média de escanteios concedidos: 3.97

Os escanteios representam oportunidades valiosas de marcar gols e desequilibrar uma partida. Ao examinar a média de escanteios para BIT x Suzhou Dongwu, é possível avaliar a capacidade de criar jogadas ofensivas de ambos os clubes a partir dessa situação específica.

Além disso, as estatísticas de cantos (como alguns chamam os escanteios) também podem fornecer insights sobre a defesa de uma determinada equipe. Ao avaliar quantos escanteios uma equipe concede, é possível ter uma noção de sua solidez na zona defensiva e sua capacidade de evitar jogadas perigosas para o adversário.

Partida Anterior

Próxima Partida