Hangzhou 2 - 2 Shanghai SIPG
14.06.2025 - 03:30
Stadium: Yellow Dragon Sports Center
Finished
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 91% | 91% | 91% | 77% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 12.59 |
| 2 |
Meizhou Hakka |
22 | 77% | 73% | 59% | 55% | 36% | 32% | 27% | 11.27 |
| 3 |
Yunnan Yukun |
22 | 86% | 77% | 64% | 50% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 11.18 |
| 4 |
Shandong Luneng |
22 | 82% | 73% | 50% | 45% | 32% | 23% | 18% | 10.32 |
| 5 |
Henan Jianye |
22 | 82% | 68% | 59% | 41% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 10.18 |
| 6 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
22 | 68% | 50% | 45% | 41% | 41% | 36% | 32% | 10.14 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 41% | 27% | 18% | 14% | 10 |
| 8 |
Dalian Zhixing |
22 | 86% | 77% | 68% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 5% | 9.91 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 64% | 59% | 55% | 41% | 27% | 23% | 14% | 9.78 |
| 10 |
Shanghai SIPG |
22 | 82% | 68% | 55% | 27% | 14% | 9% | 5% | 9.55 |
| 11 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
22 | 59% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 14% | 9.55 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
23 | 57% | 52% | 30% | 26% | 26% | 22% | 17% | 9.39 |
| 13 |
Hangzhou |
23 | 65% | 57% | 43% | 30% | 17% | 13% | 9% | 9.22 |
| 14 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
22 | 64% | 55% | 50% | 23% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9.13 |
| 15 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
22 | 77% | 68% | 59% | 41% | 18% | 5% | 5% | 9.13 |
| 16 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
22 | 64% | 55% | 41% | 23% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.82 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
10 | 90% | 90% | 90% | 70% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 12.6 |
| 2 |
Meizhou Hakka |
11 | 82% | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 11.28 |
| 3 |
Yunnan Yukun |
11 | 91% | 82% | 64% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 10.73 |
| 4 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 82% | 82% | 73% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 11.73 |
| 5 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9.46 |
| 6 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
11 | 73% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 11 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 10.36 |
| 8 |
Dalian Zhixing |
11 | 91% | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 10.36 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
12 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8.75 |
| 10 |
Shanghai SIPG |
12 | 83% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 9.66 |
| 11 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
11 | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 8.19 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
10 | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 9.7 |
| 13 |
Hangzhou |
12 | 75% | 67% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8.83 |
| 14 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 9.37 |
| 15 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 9.36 |
| 16 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9.18 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
12 | 92% | 92% | 92% | 83% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 12.58 |
| 2 |
Meizhou Hakka |
11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 11.28 |
| 3 |
Yunnan Yukun |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 64% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 11.64 |
| 4 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 82% | 64% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 8.91 |
| 5 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 91% | 73% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 10.91 |
| 6 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9.28 |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.64 |
| 8 |
Dalian Zhixing |
11 | 82% | 73% | 73% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 9.46 |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
10 | 80% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 11 |
| 10 |
Shanghai SIPG |
10 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 9.4 |
| 11 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
11 | 73% | 73% | 64% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 10.91 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
13 | 62% | 62% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 9.15 |
| 13 |
Hangzhou |
11 | 55% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9.64 |
| 14 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
11 | 55% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 8.91 |
| 15 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
11 | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 8.9 |
| 16 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.45 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
22 | 82% | 73% | 50% | 32% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 4.64 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
22 | 86% | 82% | 73% | 59% | 32% | 32% | 18% | 5.86 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
23 | 65% | 48% | 39% | 22% | 17% | 9% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 91% | 77% | 64% | 55% | 32% | 23% | 14% | 5.82 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 23% | 5% | 0% | 4.05 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
22 | 82% | 82% | 68% | 55% | 41% | 18% | 9% | 5.32 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 95% | 95% | 95% | 91% | 86% | 64% | 32% | 8.23 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
23 | 70% | 39% | 35% | 30% | 22% | 17% | 13% | 4.26 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
22 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 41% | 32% | 27% | 6.18 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
22 | 77% | 50% | 32% | 18% | 14% | 9% | 0% | 3.82 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
22 | 59% | 41% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5% | 3.82 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
22 | 86% | 77% | 64% | 59% | 36% | 23% | 14% | 5.77 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
22 | 82% | 50% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 4.18 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
22 | 77% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 23% | 14% | 5% | 4.32 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
22 | 95% | 82% | 59% | 55% | 36% | 14% | 14% | 5.55 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
22 | 73% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 4.5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
12 | 92% | 92% | 67% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 0% | 5.33 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 73% | 73% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 5.55 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
12 | 67% | 42% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3.58 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 100% | 82% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 7 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
12 | 75% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 100% | 100% | 91% | 73% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 6.64 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
10 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 80% | 40% | 9.3 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
10 | 80% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 6 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
11 | 82% | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 6.73 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
11 | 73% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.64 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
11 | 91% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5.27 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
11 | 100% | 100% | 73% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 6.73 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
11 | 91% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.91 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
11 | 82% | 73% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 5.09 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
11 | 100% | 100% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 6.18 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 5 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
10 | 70% | 50% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 100% | 91% | 73% | 64% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 6.18 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 4.64 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
10 | 70% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 10% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 64% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 4 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
12 | 92% | 92% | 92% | 83% | 83% | 50% | 25% | 7.33 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
13 | 62% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 2.92 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 5.64 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
11 | 82% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
11 | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 2.36 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
11 | 73% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.82 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
11 | 73% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
11 | 73% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
11 | 91% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 4.91 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 4 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
22 | 77% | 64% | 45% | 41% | 23% | 18% | 18% | 4.91 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
22 | 82% | 59% | 36% | 32% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.32 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
23 | 83% | 74% | 74% | 48% | 35% | 17% | 9% | 5.39 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
22 | 68% | 59% | 45% | 32% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
22 | 91% | 73% | 59% | 50% | 32% | 18% | 18% | 5.73 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
22 | 73% | 68% | 50% | 41% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 5 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
22 | 77% | 55% | 41% | 36% | 23% | 18% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
23 | 91% | 74% | 35% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 13% | 5.13 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
22 | 77% | 64% | 55% | 41% | 23% | 18% | 14% | 5.09 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
22 | 86% | 68% | 64% | 50% | 41% | 32% | 14% | 5.73 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
22 | 95% | 64% | 50% | 41% | 32% | 14% | 5% | 5 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
22 | 59% | 36% | 23% | 18% | 14% | 5% | 0% | 3.36 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
22 | 68% | 64% | 59% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 4.95 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
22 | 86% | 68% | 59% | 55% | 41% | 36% | 23% | 5.82 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
22 | 73% | 59% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
22 | 86% | 77% | 68% | 64% | 50% | 41% | 27% | 6.68 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
12 | 75% | 58% | 33% | 33% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4.33 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 3.91 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
12 | 83% | 75% | 75% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 0% | 5.25 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 3.36 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
12 | 83% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 42% | 17% | 17% | 5.08 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 64% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 5.09 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
10 | 70% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 3.3 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
10 | 90% | 60% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
11 | 64% | 64% | 64% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.55 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
11 | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 4.55 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
11 | 91% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.91 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
11 | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 2.64 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 4.45 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
11 | 91% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 5.91 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 5.73 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shanghai SIPG |
10 | 80% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 5.6 |
| 2 |
Henan Jianye |
11 | 91% | 64% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 4.73 |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
11 | 82% | 73% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 5.55 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan |
11 | 82% | 82% | 64% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 5 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai |
10 | 100% | 90% | 70% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 6.5 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng |
11 | 82% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 0% | 4.91 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
12 | 83% | 75% | 58% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 5.25 |
| 8 |
Tianjin Teda |
13 | 92% | 85% | 54% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 23% | 6.23 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka |
11 | 91% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 5.64 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
11 | 100% | 91% | 82% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 6.91 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
11 | 100% | 82% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 6.09 |
| 12 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
11 | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 13 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
11 | 73% | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 5.45 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 5.73 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing |
11 | 82% | 64% | 64% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 4.55 |
| 16 |
Yunnan Yukun |
11 | 91% | 82% | 73% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 7.64 |
The average number of corners for Hangzhou vs Shanghai SIPG can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.
Matches involving Hangzhou have averaged 9.22 corners per match during this Chinese Super League campaign. They have taken 3.83 corners per match, while they concede an average of 5.39 to their opponents.
As for their upcoming opponent, Shanghai SIPG, their corner stats are the following:
- Average number of corners in matches involving Shanghai SIPG: 9.55
- Average number of corners in favour: 4.64
- Average number of corners conceded: 4.91
Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like Hangzhou vs Shanghai SIPG. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.
Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.