Favourite this Match

Shanghai SIPG 1 - 3 Chengdu Better City FC

20.04.2025 - 07:35

Stadium: Shanghai Stadium

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Shanghai SIPG Team Logo

Shanghai SIPG

21 18 86%
2
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

21 17 81%
3
Hangzhou Team Logo

Hangzhou

22 14 64%
4
Beijing Guoan Team Logo

Beijing Guoan

21 14 67%
5
Changchun Yatai Team Logo

Changchun Yatai

21 12 57%
6
Shandong Luneng Team Logo

Shandong Luneng

21 14 67%
7
Shanghai Shenhua Team Logo

Shanghai Shenhua

21 14 67%
8
Tianjin Teda Team Logo

Tianjin Teda

22 12 55%
9
Meizhou Hakka Team Logo

Meizhou Hakka

21 14 67%
10
Qingdao Jonoon Team Logo

Qingdao Jonoon

21 9 43%
11
Wuhan Three Towns Team Logo

Wuhan Three Towns

21 14 67%
12
Chengdu Better City FC Team Logo

Chengdu Better City FC

21 11 52%
13
Sichuan Jiuniu Team Logo

Sichuan Jiuniu

21 13 62%
14
Qingdao Youth Island Team Logo

Qingdao Youth Island

21 12 57%
15
Dalian Zhixing Team Logo

Dalian Zhixing

21 7 33%
16
Yunnan Yukun Team Logo

Yunnan Yukun

21 15 71%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Shanghai SIPG Team Logo

Shanghai SIPG

11 9 82%
2
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

10 10 100%
3
Hangzhou Team Logo

Hangzhou

12 9 75%
4
Beijing Guoan Team Logo

Beijing Guoan

10 7 70%
5
Changchun Yatai Team Logo

Changchun Yatai

11 6 55%
6
Shandong Luneng Team Logo

Shandong Luneng

10 5 50%
7
Shanghai Shenhua Team Logo

Shanghai Shenhua

10 7 70%
8
Tianjin Teda Team Logo

Tianjin Teda

10 4 40%
9
Meizhou Hakka Team Logo

Meizhou Hakka

10 7 70%
10
Qingdao Jonoon Team Logo

Qingdao Jonoon

10 5 50%
11
Wuhan Three Towns Team Logo

Wuhan Three Towns

11 7 64%
12
Chengdu Better City FC Team Logo

Chengdu Better City FC

11 5 45%
13
Sichuan Jiuniu Team Logo

Sichuan Jiuniu

11 9 82%
14
Qingdao Youth Island Team Logo

Qingdao Youth Island

11 6 55%
15
Dalian Zhixing Team Logo

Dalian Zhixing

11 2 18%
16
Yunnan Yukun Team Logo

Yunnan Yukun

10 7 70%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Shanghai SIPG Team Logo

Shanghai SIPG

10 9 90%
2
Henan Jianye Team Logo

Henan Jianye

11 7 64%
3
Hangzhou Team Logo

Hangzhou

10 5 50%
4
Beijing Guoan Team Logo

Beijing Guoan

11 7 64%
5
Changchun Yatai Team Logo

Changchun Yatai

10 6 60%
6
Shandong Luneng Team Logo

Shandong Luneng

11 9 82%
7
Shanghai Shenhua Team Logo

Shanghai Shenhua

11 7 64%
8
Tianjin Teda Team Logo

Tianjin Teda

12 8 67%
9
Meizhou Hakka Team Logo

Meizhou Hakka

11 7 64%
10
Qingdao Jonoon Team Logo

Qingdao Jonoon

11 4 36%
11
Wuhan Three Towns Team Logo

Wuhan Three Towns

10 7 70%
12
Chengdu Better City FC Team Logo

Chengdu Better City FC

10 6 60%
13
Sichuan Jiuniu Team Logo

Sichuan Jiuniu

10 4 40%
14
Qingdao Youth Island Team Logo

Qingdao Youth Island

10 6 60%
15
Dalian Zhixing Team Logo

Dalian Zhixing

10 5 50%
16
Yunnan Yukun Team Logo

Yunnan Yukun

11 8 73%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Shanghai SIPG and Chengdu Better City FC have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Chinese Super League.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 21 matches played in the Chinese Super League, Shanghai SIPG has scored and conceded goals in 18 matches. In other words, 86% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 82% at home, while it is 90% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Chengdu Better City FC has scored and conceded in 11 of their 21 matches so far in the Chinese Super League, giving them a BTTS rate of 52%. Both teams have scored in 5 of Chengdu Better City FC’s 11 home matches, and it has happened 6 times in 10 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets