# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
20 | 10 | 50% |
2 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
21 | 9 | 43% |
3 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
21 | 8 | 38% |
4 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
21 | 7 | 33% |
5 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
20 | 7 | 35% |
6 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
20 | 6 | 30% |
7 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
21 | 6 | 29% |
8 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
21 | 6 | 29% |
9 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
21 | 6 | 29% |
10 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
21 | 6 | 29% |
11 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
20 | 5 | 25% |
12 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
21 | 4 | 19% |
13 |
![]() Nanjing City |
21 | 4 | 19% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
21 | 4 | 19% |
15 |
![]() Dongguan United |
21 | 3 | 14% |
16 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
21 | 2 | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
11 | 7 | 64% |
2 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
9 | 5 | 56% |
3 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
10 | 4 | 40% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
11 | 4 | 36% |
5 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
11 | 4 | 36% |
6 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
10 | 4 | 40% |
7 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
10 | 3 | 30% |
8 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
11 | 3 | 27% |
9 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
11 | 3 | 27% |
10 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
10 | 3 | 30% |
11 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
11 | 3 | 27% |
12 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
10 | 2 | 20% |
13 |
![]() Nanjing City |
10 | 2 | 20% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
10 | 2 | 20% |
15 |
![]() Dongguan United |
11 | 1 | 9% |
16 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
10 | 0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
11 | 5 | 45% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
11 | 4 | 36% |
3 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
10 | 4 | 40% |
4 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
10 | 3 | 30% |
5 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
10 | 3 | 30% |
6 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
10 | 3 | 30% |
7 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
9 | 3 | 33% |
8 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
10 | 2 | 20% |
9 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
10 | 2 | 20% |
10 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
11 | 2 | 18% |
11 |
![]() Nanjing City |
11 | 2 | 18% |
12 |
![]() Dongguan United |
10 | 2 | 20% |
13 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
10 | 2 | 20% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
11 | 2 | 18% |
15 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
11 | 2 | 18% |
16 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
11 | 2 | 18% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Nantong Zhiyun vs Guangzhou E-Power:
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.