# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Nanjing City |
21 | 62% | 52% | 14% |
2 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
21 | 62% | 33% | 29% |
3 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
21 | 62% | 38% | 14% |
4 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
21 | 57% | 43% | 19% |
5 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
21 | 57% | 38% | 19% |
6 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
21 | 52% | 43% | 29% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
20 | 50% | 35% | 20% |
8 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
20 | 50% | 35% | 25% |
9 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
21 | 48% | 24% | 10% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
21 | 48% | 29% | 10% |
11 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
21 | 48% | 38% | 19% |
12 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
20 | 45% | 45% | 25% |
13 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
21 | 43% | 19% | 19% |
14 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
21 | 38% | 24% | 5% |
15 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
20 | 35% | 30% | 20% |
16 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
21 | 33% | 14% | 5% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Nanjing City |
21 | 76% | 33% | 10% |
2 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
21 | 67% | 48% | 14% |
3 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
21 | 67% | 38% | 24% |
4 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
20 | 65% | 45% | 20% |
5 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
20 | 65% | 35% | 15% |
6 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
21 | 62% | 29% | 14% |
7 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
21 | 57% | 33% | 10% |
8 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
21 | 57% | 33% | 14% |
9 |
![]() Dongguan United |
21 | 52% | 19% | 14% |
10 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
21 | 52% | 24% | 10% |
11 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
21 | 43% | 19% | 5% |
12 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
21 | 43% | 19% | 5% |
13 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
20 | 40% | 10% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
21 | 38% | 14% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
21 | 38% | 19% | 10% |
16 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
20 | 35% | 20% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
20 | 75% | 50% | 30% |
2 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
21 | 67% | 29% | 10% |
3 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
21 | 62% | 24% | 10% |
4 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
21 | 62% | 29% | 19% |
5 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
21 | 62% | 24% | 14% |
6 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
21 | 57% | 29% | 14% |
7 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
21 | 52% | 24% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Nanjing City |
21 | 52% | 29% | 10% |
9 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
21 | 52% | 38% | 10% |
10 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
21 | 52% | 29% | 5% |
11 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
20 | 50% | 30% | 25% |
12 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
20 | 50% | 30% | 5% |
13 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
21 | 43% | 19% | 5% |
14 |
![]() Dongguan United |
21 | 43% | 24% | 5% |
15 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
20 | 40% | 20% | 5% |
16 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
21 | 38% | 14% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Shaanxi Union here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Shaanxi Union bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the China League One, just check out the table above.
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.