Season
2024/25
Country
Germany
Stadium
Alpenbauer Sportpark
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Energie Cottbus |
24 | 63% |
2 |
![]() Verl |
24 | 63% |
3 |
![]() Stuttgart II |
22 | 58% |
4 |
![]() Saarbrucken |
20 | 53% |
5 |
![]() Erzgebirge Aue |
20 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Hansa Rostock |
20 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Dynamo Dresden |
20 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Arminia Bielefeld |
19 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Alemannia Aachen |
19 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Wehen Wiesbaden |
19 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Waldhof Mannheim |
18 | 47% |
12 |
![]() Rot-Weiss Essen |
17 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Ingolstadt |
17 | 45% |
14 |
![]() 1860 München |
16 | 42% |
15 |
![]() Viktoria Köln |
16 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Sandhausen |
16 | 42% |
17 |
![]() Borussia Dortmund II |
15 | 39% |
18 |
![]() Unterhaching |
14 | 37% |
19 |
![]() Osnabrück |
14 | 37% |
20 |
![]() Hannover 96 II |
11 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Stuttgart II |
15 | 79% |
2 |
![]() Hansa Rostock |
14 | 74% |
3 |
![]() Energie Cottbus |
14 | 74% |
4 |
![]() Erzgebirge Aue |
13 | 68% |
5 |
![]() Verl |
12 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Arminia Bielefeld |
11 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Wehen Wiesbaden |
11 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Saarbrucken |
11 | 58% |
9 |
![]() Waldhof Mannheim |
11 | 58% |
10 |
![]() Alemannia Aachen |
10 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Viktoria Köln |
10 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Dynamo Dresden |
10 | 53% |
13 |
![]() Ingolstadt |
10 | 53% |
14 |
![]() 1860 München |
9 | 47% |
15 |
![]() Osnabrück |
9 | 47% |
16 |
![]() Rot-Weiss Essen |
9 | 47% |
17 |
![]() Sandhausen |
8 | 42% |
18 |
![]() Borussia Dortmund II |
8 | 42% |
19 |
![]() Unterhaching |
6 | 32% |
20 |
![]() Hannover 96 II |
5 | 26% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Verl |
12 | 63% |
2 |
![]() Dynamo Dresden |
10 | 53% |
3 |
![]() Energie Cottbus |
10 | 53% |
4 |
![]() Saarbrucken |
9 | 47% |
5 |
![]() Alemannia Aachen |
9 | 47% |
6 |
![]() Arminia Bielefeld |
8 | 42% |
7 |
![]() Sandhausen |
8 | 42% |
8 |
![]() Unterhaching |
8 | 42% |
9 |
![]() Rot-Weiss Essen |
8 | 42% |
10 |
![]() Wehen Wiesbaden |
8 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Waldhof Mannheim |
7 | 37% |
12 |
![]() Borussia Dortmund II |
7 | 37% |
13 |
![]() Stuttgart II |
7 | 37% |
14 |
![]() 1860 München |
7 | 37% |
15 |
![]() Erzgebirge Aue |
7 | 37% |
16 |
![]() Ingolstadt |
7 | 37% |
17 |
![]() Viktoria Köln |
6 | 32% |
18 |
![]() Hannover 96 II |
6 | 32% |
19 |
![]() Hansa Rostock |
6 | 32% |
20 |
![]() Osnabrück |
5 | 26% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Hannover 96 II |
27 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Unterhaching |
24 | 63% |
3 |
![]() Osnabrück |
24 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Borussia Dortmund II |
23 | 60% |
5 |
![]() 1860 München |
22 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Sandhausen |
22 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Viktoria Köln |
22 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Ingolstadt |
21 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Rot-Weiss Essen |
21 | 55% |
10 |
![]() Waldhof Mannheim |
20 | 52% |
11 |
![]() Arminia Bielefeld |
19 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Alemannia Aachen |
19 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Wehen Wiesbaden |
19 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Dynamo Dresden |
18 | 47% |
15 |
![]() Erzgebirge Aue |
18 | 47% |
16 |
![]() Hansa Rostock |
18 | 47% |
17 |
![]() Saarbrucken |
18 | 47% |
18 |
![]() Stuttgart II |
16 | 42% |
19 |
![]() Energie Cottbus |
14 | 36% |
20 |
![]() Verl |
14 | 36% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Hannover 96 II |
14 | 73% |
2 |
![]() Unterhaching |
13 | 68% |
3 |
![]() Borussia Dortmund II |
11 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Sandhausen |
11 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Rot-Weiss Essen |
10 | 52% |
6 |
![]() Osnabrück |
10 | 52% |
7 |
![]() 1860 München |
10 | 52% |
8 |
![]() Ingolstadt |
9 | 47% |
9 |
![]() Dynamo Dresden |
9 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Viktoria Köln |
9 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Alemannia Aachen |
9 | 47% |
12 |
![]() Saarbrucken |
8 | 42% |
13 |
![]() Waldhof Mannheim |
8 | 42% |
14 |
![]() Arminia Bielefeld |
8 | 42% |
15 |
![]() Wehen Wiesbaden |
8 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Verl |
7 | 36% |
17 |
![]() Erzgebirge Aue |
6 | 31% |
18 |
![]() Hansa Rostock |
5 | 26% |
19 |
![]() Energie Cottbus |
5 | 26% |
20 |
![]() Stuttgart II |
4 | 21% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Osnabrück |
14 | 73% |
2 |
![]() Hannover 96 II |
13 | 68% |
3 |
![]() Hansa Rostock |
13 | 68% |
4 |
![]() Viktoria Köln |
13 | 68% |
5 |
![]() 1860 München |
12 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Waldhof Mannheim |
12 | 63% |
7 |
![]() Borussia Dortmund II |
12 | 63% |
8 |
![]() Stuttgart II |
12 | 63% |
9 |
![]() Ingolstadt |
12 | 63% |
10 |
![]() Erzgebirge Aue |
12 | 63% |
11 |
![]() Rot-Weiss Essen |
11 | 57% |
12 |
![]() Unterhaching |
11 | 57% |
13 |
![]() Arminia Bielefeld |
11 | 57% |
14 |
![]() Sandhausen |
11 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Wehen Wiesbaden |
11 | 57% |
16 |
![]() Saarbrucken |
10 | 52% |
17 |
![]() Alemannia Aachen |
10 | 52% |
18 |
![]() Dynamo Dresden |
9 | 47% |
19 |
![]() Energie Cottbus |
9 | 47% |
20 |
![]() Verl |
7 | 36% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Unterhaching scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the 3. Liga 2024/2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Unterhaching is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the 3. Liga, Unterhaching has scored before the opponent in 37% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 63%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Unterhaching’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Unterhaching being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.