Season
2022
Country
China
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 76% |
2 |
![]() Kunshan |
34 | 76% |
3 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 74% |
4 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 56% |
5 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 56% |
6 |
![]() Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 47% |
9 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
34 | 44% |
11 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 41% |
13 |
![]() Nanjing City |
34 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Zibo Cuju |
34 | 38% |
15 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 32% |
16 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 29% |
17 |
![]() Beijing BG |
34 | 21% |
18 |
![]() BIT |
34 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
17 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Kunshan |
17 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 65% |
4 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 65% |
5 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
17 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 47% |
9 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 41% |
10 |
![]() Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Zibo Cuju |
17 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
17 | 41% |
13 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 35% |
14 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 35% |
15 |
![]() Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 35% |
16 |
![]() Beijing BG |
17 | 24% |
17 |
![]() Nanjing City |
17 | 24% |
18 |
![]() BIT |
17 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Kunshan |
17 | 82% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 82% |
3 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
17 | 82% |
4 |
![]() Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 59% |
5 |
![]() Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 59% |
7 |
![]() Nanjing City |
17 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
17 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
17 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 35% |
13 |
![]() Zibo Cuju |
17 | 35% |
14 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 29% |
15 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 29% |
16 |
![]() Beijing BG |
17 | 18% |
17 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 18% |
18 |
![]() BIT |
17 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() BIT |
34 | 82% |
2 |
![]() Beijing BG |
34 | 76% |
3 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 53% |
5 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
34 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Zibo Cuju |
34 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 44% |
12 |
![]() Nanjing City |
34 | 44% |
13 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 41% |
14 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 38% |
15 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 29% |
16 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 21% |
17 |
![]() Kunshan |
34 | 18% |
18 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 15% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() BIT |
17 | 82% |
2 |
![]() Beijing BG |
17 | 76% |
3 |
![]() Nanjing City |
17 | 65% |
4 |
![]() Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 65% |
5 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
17 | 59% |
7 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Zibo Cuju |
17 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 35% |
13 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 35% |
14 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
17 | 29% |
15 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
17 | 29% |
16 |
![]() Kunshan |
17 | 24% |
17 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 24% |
18 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 18% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 82% |
2 |
![]() BIT |
17 | 82% |
3 |
![]() Beijing BG |
17 | 76% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 65% |
5 |
![]() Zibo Cuju |
17 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 47% |
7 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
17 | 47% |
8 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 47% |
9 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
17 | 41% |
13 |
![]() Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 41% |
14 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 35% |
15 |
![]() Nanjing City |
17 | 24% |
16 |
![]() Kunshan |
17 | 12% |
17 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 12% |
18 |
![]() Qingdao Jonoon |
17 | 12% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Kunshan scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the China League One 2022.
Through this stat, we can see whether Kunshan is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the China League One, Kunshan has scored before the opponent in 76% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 18%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Kunshan’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Kunshan being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.