Football statistics for Albirex Niigata

Team Info

Season

Country

Stadium

2025

Japan

Denka Big Swan Stadium

Competition

Japan

J1 League

Japan

Emperor Cup

Summary Match Schedule Match Results Squads Top Scorers & Assists Standings

Table Corners Cards 1st Half 2nd Half Over Under Goals Clean Sheet BTTS Match Scoring / Conceding First

Over 2.5
Over 0.5
Over 1.5
Over 3.5
Over 4.5
Over 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	17	61%	46%	73%
2	Yokohama	28	9	32%	20%	46%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	11	39%	50%	29%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	9	32%	33%	31%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	15	54%	40%	69%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	8	29%	29%	29%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	17	59%	64%	53%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	10	36%	36%	36%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	13	46%	50%	43%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	18	64%	64%	64%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	11	39%	43%	36%
12	Urawa Reds	28	13	46%	47%	46%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	14	48%	54%	44%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	13	46%	43%	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	10	34%	36%	33%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	12	41%	36%	47%
17	Tokyo	28	14	50%	57%	43%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	15	54%	57%	50%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	11	39%	43%	36%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	18	64%	71%	57%

#	Team	MP	Over 0.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	28	100%	100%	100%
2	Yokohama	28	25	89%	93%	85%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	25	89%	93%	86%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	26	93%	93%	92%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	27	96%	100%	92%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	22	79%	100%	57%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	28	97%	100%	93%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	23	82%	79%	86%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	26	93%	93%	93%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	26	93%	86%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	25	89%	79%	100%
12	Urawa Reds	28	25	89%	87%	92%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	28	97%	100%	94%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	28	100%	100%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	28	97%	93%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	27	93%	93%	93%
17	Tokyo	28	27	96%	93%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	27	96%	93%	100%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	27	96%	93%	100%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	26	93%	93%	93%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	23	82%	77%	87%
2	Yokohama	28	16	57%	53%	62%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	21	75%	93%	57%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	16	57%	53%	62%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	23	82%	80%	85%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	11	39%	43%	36%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	20	69%	79%	60%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	14	50%	50%	50%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	20	71%	64%	79%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	25	89%	86%	93%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	17	61%	71%	50%
12	Urawa Reds	28	20	71%	60%	85%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	19	66%	69%	63%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	18	64%	71%	57%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	15	52%	43%	60%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	16	55%	50%	60%
17	Tokyo	28	20	71%	71%	71%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	21	75%	79%	71%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	22	79%	71%	86%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	23	82%	86%	79%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	7	25%	23%	27%
2	Yokohama	28	2	7%	7%	8%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	6	21%	29%	14%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	2	7%	7%	8%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	8	29%	13%	46%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	3	11%	7%	14%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	7	24%	14%	33%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	5	18%	21%	14%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	6	21%	21%	21%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	4	14%	14%	14%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	5	18%	14%	21%
12	Urawa Reds	28	6	21%	20%	23%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	9	31%	23%	38%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	5	18%	21%	14%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	1	3%	0%	7%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	6	21%	21%	20%
17	Tokyo	28	8	29%	29%	29%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	8	29%	36%	21%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	5	18%	29%	7%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	9	32%	50%	14%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	4	14%	15%	13%
2	Yokohama	28	1	4%	0%	8%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	3	11%	7%	14%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	1	4%	0%	8%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	4	14%	7%	23%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	0	0%	0%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	1	3%	0%	7%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	2	7%	7%	7%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	3	11%	14%	7%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	1	4%	7%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	2	7%	7%	7%
12	Urawa Reds	28	4	14%	13%	15%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	5	17%	15%	19%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	2	7%	14%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	2	7%	7%	7%
17	Tokyo	28	3	11%	7%	14%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	3	11%	14%	7%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	3	11%	14%	7%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	4	14%	21%	7%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	2	7%	0%	13%
2	Yokohama	28	0	0%	0%	0%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	1	4%	0%	7%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	0	0%	0%	0%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	3	11%	7%	15%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	0	0%	0%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	1	3%	0%	7%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	1	4%	0%	7%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	2	7%	14%	0%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	1	4%	7%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	1	4%	0%	7%
12	Urawa Reds	28	1	4%	0%	8%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	3	10%	8%	13%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	1	4%	7%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	0	0%	0%	0%
17	Tokyo	28	0	0%	0%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	1	4%	7%	0%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	2	7%	14%	0%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	4	14%	21%	7%

Under 2.5
Under 0.5
Under 1.5
Under 3.5
Under 4.5
Under 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	11	39%	54%	27%
2	Yokohama	28	19	68%	80%	54%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	17	61%	50%	71%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	19	68%	67%	69%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	13	46%	60%	31%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	20	71%	71%	71%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	12	41%	36%	47%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	18	64%	64%	64%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	15	54%	50%	57%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	10	36%	36%	36%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	17	61%	57%	64%
12	Urawa Reds	28	15	54%	53%	54%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	15	52%	46%	56%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	15	54%	57%	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	19	66%	64%	67%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	17	59%	64%	53%
17	Tokyo	28	14	50%	43%	57%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	13	46%	43%	50%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	17	61%	57%	64%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	10	36%	29%	43%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	0	0%	0%	0%
2	Yokohama	28	3	11%	7%	15%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	3	11%	7%	14%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	2	7%	7%	8%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	1	4%	0%	8%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	6	21%	0%	43%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	1	3%	0%	7%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	5	18%	21%	14%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	2	7%	7%	7%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	2	7%	14%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	3	11%	21%	0%
12	Urawa Reds	28	3	11%	13%	8%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	1	3%	0%	6%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	0	0%	0%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	1	3%	7%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	2	7%	7%	7%
17	Tokyo	28	1	4%	7%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	1	4%	7%	0%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	1	4%	7%	0%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	2	7%	7%	7%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	5	18%	23%	13%
2	Yokohama	28	12	43%	47%	38%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	7	25%	7%	43%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	12	43%	47%	38%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	5	18%	20%	15%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	17	61%	57%	64%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	9	31%	21%	40%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	14	50%	50%	50%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	8	29%	36%	21%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	3	11%	14%	7%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	11	39%	29%	50%
12	Urawa Reds	28	8	29%	40%	15%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	10	34%	31%	38%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	10	36%	29%	43%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	14	48%	57%	40%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	13	45%	50%	40%
17	Tokyo	28	8	29%	29%	29%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	7	25%	21%	29%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	6	21%	29%	14%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	5	18%	14%	21%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	21	75%	77%	73%
2	Yokohama	28	26	93%	93%	92%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	22	79%	71%	86%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	26	93%	93%	92%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	20	71%	87%	54%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	25	89%	93%	86%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	22	76%	86%	67%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	23	82%	79%	86%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	22	79%	79%	79%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	24	86%	86%	86%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	23	82%	86%	79%
12	Urawa Reds	28	22	79%	80%	77%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	20	69%	77%	63%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	23	82%	79%	86%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	28	97%	100%	93%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	23	79%	79%	80%
17	Tokyo	28	20	71%	71%	71%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	20	71%	64%	79%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	23	82%	71%	93%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	19	68%	50%	86%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	24	86%	85%	87%
2	Yokohama	28	27	96%	100%	92%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	25	89%	93%	86%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	27	96%	100%	92%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	24	86%	93%	77%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	28	100%	100%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	28	97%	100%	93%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	26	93%	93%	93%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	25	89%	86%	93%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	27	96%	93%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	26	93%	93%	93%
12	Urawa Reds	28	24	86%	87%	85%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	24	83%	85%	81%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	26	93%	86%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	29	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	27	93%	93%	93%
17	Tokyo	28	25	89%	93%	86%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	25	89%	86%	93%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	25	89%	86%	93%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	24	86%	79%	93%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	28	26	93%	100%	87%
2	Yokohama	28	28	100%	100%	100%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	28	27	96%	100%	93%
4	Fagiano Okayama	28	28	100%	100%	100%
5	Cerezo Osaka	28	25	89%	93%	85%
6	Tokyo Verdy	28	28	100%	100%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	29	28	97%	100%	93%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	28	27	96%	100%	93%
9	Shonan Bellmare	28	26	93%	86%	100%
10	Nagoya Grampus	28	27	96%	93%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	28	27	96%	100%	93%
12	Urawa Reds	28	27	96%	100%	92%
13	Gamba Osaka	29	26	90%	92%	88%
14	Kashima Antlers	28	27	96%	93%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	29	29	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	29	29	100%	100%	100%
17	Tokyo	28	28	100%	100%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	28	27	96%	93%	100%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	28	26	93%	86%	100%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	28	24	86%	79%	93%

Average goals scored and conceded: Albirex Niigata

Knowing Albirex Niigata’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the J1 League 2025 on both ends of the pitch.

Check out some of the Albirex Niigata’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:

54% of Albirex Niigata games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Albirex Niigata and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 46%.

This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in J. League.

All of this information can help determine how Albirex Niigata’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.

However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.