2nd Half
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
25 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 33 | 1.43 |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
23 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 14 | 11 | +3 | 28 | 1.33 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
26 | 8 | 12 | 5 | 13 | 9 | +4 | 36 | 1.44 |
| 4 |
LA Force |
20 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 21 | 1.11 |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
22 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 15 | 6 | +9 | 39 | 1.95 |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
24 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 31 | 1.41 |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
12 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
23 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 22 | 1.1 |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
23 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 3 | 23 | -20 | 9 | 0.45 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
13 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 18 | 1.5 |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
11 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 15 | 1.67 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
14 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 16 | 1.23 |
| 4 |
LA Force |
11 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 15 | 1.36 |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
12 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 5 | +5 | 21 | 1.91 |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
12 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 5 | +8 | 21 | 1.91 |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 7 | 1.75 |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
11 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 3 | +5 | 16 | 1.6 |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
11 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 4 | 0.4 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
12 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 15 | 1.36 |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
12 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 13 | 1.08 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 4 |
LA Force |
9 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 6 | 0.75 |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 18 | 2 |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
12 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 10 | 0.91 |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 1.25 |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
12 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 6 | 0.6 |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
12 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 14 | -13 | 5 | 0.5 |
Performance in the 2nd half: Syracuse Pulse - 2022
The second half of football matches is crucial; it is when most matches are ultimately decided. That is why analysing a team’s performance exclusively in the second half of the match can be useful for evaluating different factors like tactical adaptation, players’ physical conditioning, the effectiveness of a coach’s substitutions or tactical changes, and the team’s overall mentality.
If we take only the second half statistics of Syracuse Pulse’s games in NISA 2022 into account, we can see that:
- In 23 games played so far, Syracuse Pulse has claimed victory in 5, drawn 7 and lost 8.
- And in terms of points per match for the final 45 minutes, Syracuse Pulse is averaging 1.1.
- If only the second halves of games counted, Syracuse Pulse would have the 6th best campaign in NISA this season.
Studying statistics exclusively from the second half can help determine if a team can capably perform during what is often the pressure-filled portion of the match, or if they consistently falter under the pressure
So visit this page all season long if you’d like to see the Syracuse Pulse second half numbers in home games, away games, and overall, during the NISA 2022.