# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
25 | 64% |
2 |
![]() California Utd Strikers |
22 | 64% |
3 |
![]() Michigan Stars |
26 | 58% |
4 |
![]() ASC San Diego |
23 | 52% |
5 |
![]() Maryland Bobcats |
24 | 46% |
6 |
![]() Syracuse Pulse |
23 | 39% |
7 |
![]() Bay Cities |
12 | 33% |
8 |
![]() Flower City Union |
23 | 22% |
9 |
![]() LA Force |
20 | 10% |
10 |
![]() Valley United |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() ASC San Diego |
11 | 73% |
2 |
![]() Michigan Stars |
14 | 71% |
3 |
![]() California Utd Strikers |
12 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
13 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Maryland Bobcats |
12 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Bay Cities |
4 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Syracuse Pulse |
11 | 36% |
8 |
![]() Flower City Union |
11 | 18% |
9 |
![]() Valley United |
0 | 0% |
10 |
![]() LA Force |
11 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
12 | 67% |
2 |
![]() California Utd Strikers |
10 | 60% |
3 |
![]() Syracuse Pulse |
12 | 42% |
4 |
![]() Michigan Stars |
12 | 42% |
5 |
![]() Maryland Bobcats |
12 | 33% |
6 |
![]() ASC San Diego |
12 | 33% |
7 |
![]() Flower City Union |
12 | 25% |
8 |
![]() Bay Cities |
8 | 25% |
9 |
![]() LA Force |
9 | 22% |
10 |
![]() Valley United |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Flower City Union |
23 | 74% |
2 |
![]() LA Force |
20 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Syracuse Pulse |
23 | 52% |
4 |
![]() Maryland Bobcats |
24 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Bay Cities |
12 | 50% |
6 |
![]() ASC San Diego |
23 | 43% |
7 |
![]() California Utd Strikers |
22 | 27% |
8 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
25 | 24% |
9 |
![]() Michigan Stars |
26 | 19% |
10 |
![]() Valley United |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Flower City Union |
11 | 82% |
2 |
![]() LA Force |
11 | 64% |
3 |
![]() Bay Cities |
4 | 50% |
4 |
![]() Syracuse Pulse |
11 | 45% |
5 |
![]() Maryland Bobcats |
12 | 42% |
6 |
![]() ASC San Diego |
11 | 27% |
7 |
![]() California Utd Strikers |
12 | 25% |
8 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
13 | 23% |
9 |
![]() Michigan Stars |
14 | 14% |
10 |
![]() Valley United |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() LA Force |
9 | 78% |
2 |
![]() Flower City Union |
12 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Syracuse Pulse |
12 | 58% |
4 |
![]() ASC San Diego |
12 | 58% |
5 |
![]() Maryland Bobcats |
12 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Bay Cities |
8 | 50% |
7 |
![]() California Utd Strikers |
10 | 30% |
8 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
12 | 25% |
9 |
![]() Michigan Stars |
12 | 25% |
10 |
![]() Valley United |
0 | 0% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Syracuse Pulse scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the NISA 2022.
Through this stat, we can see whether Syracuse Pulse is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the NISA, Syracuse Pulse has scored before the opponent in 39% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 52%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Syracuse Pulse’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Syracuse Pulse being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.