Pronósticos en WhatsApp

Xinjiang Tianshan Logotipo del equipo

Estadísticas de Xinjiang Tianshan

Información del equipo

Temporada

País

Recinto

2022

China

Hongshan Stadium

Competición

China

China League One

Resumen Resultados del Partido Equipo Mejores Jugadores Clasificación

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería a Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	65%	56%	47%	38%	18%	12%	6%	9.06
2	Nanjing City	34	59%	53%	35%	32%	21%	12%	3%	8.94
3	Kunshan	34	62%	56%	44%	35%	21%	9%	6%	8.79
4	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	56%	41%	38%	35%	21%	18%	12%	8.7
5	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	59%	56%	41%	32%	21%	15%	3%	8.63
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	62%	53%	38%	32%	24%	9%	6%	8.62
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	53%	47%	41%	32%	29%	18%	12%	8.55
8	Suzhou Dongwu	34	59%	50%	38%	26%	21%	6%	0%	8.44
9	Shenyang Urban	34	56%	41%	29%	26%	18%	18%	9%	8.37
10	Hebei Kungfu	34	53%	44%	29%	26%	24%	12%	12%	8.25
11	Nantong Zhiyun	34	56%	47%	24%	18%	12%	12%	6%	8.14
12	Guangxi Baoyun	34	47%	41%	29%	26%	12%	6%	3%	8.03
13	Shanghai Jiading	34	41%	35%	32%	24%	18%	9%	3%	7.84
14	Qingdao Jonoon	34	50%	35%	29%	18%	12%	6%	3%	7.82
15	Beijing BG	34	47%	35%	18%	15%	12%	6%	6%	7.65
16	Zibo Cuju	34	44%	35%	18%	15%	6%	3%	0%	7.54
17	BIT	34	38%	35%	29%	15%	12%	6%	6%	7.44
18	Qingdao Youth Island	34	35%	26%	21%	12%	3%	3%	0%	6.92

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	71%	71%	59%	53%	12%	6%	0%	9.23
2	Nanjing City	17	59%	59%	47%	41%	29%	18%	6%	9.3
3	Kunshan	17	53%	47%	35%	35%	24%	6%	0%	8.62
4	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	76%	47%	47%	41%	18%	18%	12%	9.76
5	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59%	59%	47%	35%	29%	24%	0%	8.83
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	53%	41%	29%	29%	12%	6%	8.77
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	47%	41%	29%	24%	24%	12%	6%	8.12
8	Suzhou Dongwu	17	47%	41%	35%	12%	6%	0%	0%	7.76
9	Shenyang Urban	17	65%	41%	35%	35%	18%	18%	12%	8.82
10	Hebei Kungfu	17	29%	29%	18%	12%	12%	12%	12%	6.6
11	Nantong Zhiyun	17	59%	53%	29%	24%	12%	12%	6%	8.53
12	Guangxi Baoyun	17	47%	35%	18%	18%	12%	6%	6%	7.69
13	Shanghai Jiading	17	53%	41%	41%	29%	24%	6%	6%	8.51
14	Qingdao Jonoon	17	65%	47%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	8.77
15	Beijing BG	17	41%	35%	18%	18%	18%	12%	12%	7.47
16	Zibo Cuju	17	47%	41%	18%	12%	12%	6%	0%	7.53
17	BIT	17	35%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	6.88
18	Qingdao Youth Island	17	24%	18%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	6.36

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	59%	41%	35%	24%	24%	18%	12%	8.88
2	Nanjing City	17	59%	47%	24%	24%	12%	6%	0%	8.56
3	Kunshan	17	71%	65%	53%	35%	18%	12%	12%	8.95
4	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	35%	35%	29%	29%	24%	18%	12%	7.64
5	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59%	53%	35%	29%	12%	6%	6%	8.44
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	53%	35%	35%	18%	6%	6%	8.47
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	53%	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	8.94
8	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	59%	41%	41%	35%	12%	0%	9.12
9	Shenyang Urban	17	47%	41%	24%	18%	18%	18%	6%	7.94
10	Hebei Kungfu	17	76%	59%	41%	41%	35%	12%	12%	9.7
11	Nantong Zhiyun	17	53%	41%	18%	12%	12%	12%	6%	7.76
12	Guangxi Baoyun	17	47%	47%	41%	35%	12%	6%	0%	8.38
13	Shanghai Jiading	17	29%	29%	24%	18%	12%	12%	0%	7.24
14	Qingdao Jonoon	17	35%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	6.73
15	Beijing BG	17	53%	35%	18%	12%	6%	0%	0%	7.82
16	Zibo Cuju	17	41%	29%	18%	18%	0%	0%	0%	7.56
17	BIT	17	41%	41%	41%	18%	18%	6%	6%	8
18	Qingdao Youth Island	17	47%	35%	35%	18%	6%	6%	0%	7.47

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	62%	38%	24%	12%	9%	9%	6%	3.48
2	Beijing BG	34	44%	32%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	74%	62%	59%	41%	24%	12%	6%	4.91
4	BIT	34	47%	21%	21%	6%	6%	3%	0%	2.41
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	76%	65%	47%	32%	12%	3%	3%	4.3
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	65%	62%	47%	26%	21%	21%	18%	4.61
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	56%	44%	41%	24%	18%	9%	4.5
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	88%	71%	56%	44%	32%	18%	12%	5.29
9	Zibo Cuju	34	53%	41%	24%	12%	6%	6%	0%	3.18
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	65%	47%	35%	24%	18%	9%	6%	4.03
11	Shenyang Urban	34	68%	47%	32%	18%	9%	6%	3%	3.67
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	53%	35%	29%	18%	12%	6%	3%	3.39
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	76%	62%	53%	24%	12%	9%	6%	4.47
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	79%	68%	56%	47%	32%	26%	21%	5.41
15	Kunshan	34	82%	71%	53%	41%	35%	21%	9%	5.27
16	Nanjing City	34	85%	56%	53%	35%	26%	21%	12%	5
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	56%	44%	35%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3.68
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	62%	44%	32%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3.72

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59%	29%	12%	6%	6%	6%	6%	3.12
2	Beijing BG	17	41%	29%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47
3	Qingdao Jonoon	17	82%	71%	71%	53%	35%	18%	12%	5.53
4	BIT	17	41%	24%	24%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.13
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	76%	76%	65%	41%	18%	6%	6%	4.88
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	59%	41%	24%	18%	18%	18%	4.56
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	59%	53%	53%	29%	29%	18%	5.24
8	Nantong Zhiyun	17	94%	82%	59%	47%	35%	18%	18%	5.71
9	Zibo Cuju	17	47%	29%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.41
10	Guangxi Baoyun	17	59%	35%	29%	24%	18%	12%	6%	3.63
11	Shenyang Urban	17	76%	47%	41%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
12	Shanghai Jiading	17	59%	59%	47%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.13
13	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	59%	53%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	94%	76%	59%	47%	35%	35%	24%	6
15	Kunshan	17	76%	65%	53%	41%	41%	24%	6%	5.31
16	Nanjing City	17	82%	59%	59%	41%	35%	29%	12%	5.18
17	Qingdao Youth Island	17	47%	41%	35%	29%	6%	6%	0%	3.24
18	Hebei Kungfu	17	41%	24%	12%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.53

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	65%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.88
2	Beijing BG	17	47%	35%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47
3	Qingdao Jonoon	17	65%	53%	47%	29%	12%	6%	0%	4.2
4	BIT	17	53%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.69
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	76%	53%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	3.69
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	65%	53%	29%	24%	24%	18%	4.65
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	53%	35%	29%	18%	6%	0%	3.76
8	Nantong Zhiyun	17	82%	59%	53%	41%	29%	18%	6%	4.88
9	Zibo Cuju	17	59%	53%	41%	24%	12%	12%	0%	4
10	Guangxi Baoyun	17	71%	59%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.44
11	Shenyang Urban	17	59%	47%	24%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.47
12	Shanghai Jiading	17	47%	12%	12%	12%	6%	6%	0%	2.71
13	Suzhou Dongwu	17	82%	65%	53%	29%	18%	18%	12%	5.06
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	65%	59%	53%	47%	29%	18%	18%	4.82
15	Kunshan	17	88%	76%	53%	41%	29%	18%	12%	5.24
16	Nanjing City	17	88%	53%	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.81
17	Qingdao Youth Island	17	65%	47%	35%	24%	24%	12%	6%	4.12
18	Hebei Kungfu	17	82%	65%	53%	41%	18%	12%	6%	4.76

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	82%	68%	53%	47%	26%	24%	12%	5.15
2	Beijing BG	34	74%	71%	56%	44%	38%	26%	12%	5.18
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	50%	32%	26%	6%	3%	3%	0%	2.91
4	BIT	34	71%	62%	50%	38%	26%	15%	15%	5.03
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	82%	65%	56%	32%	18%	9%	6%	4.76
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	59%	41%	29%	21%	18%	15%	12%	3.94
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	53%	44%	35%	15%	9%	6%	4.12
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	47%	32%	21%	15%	6%	6%	6%	2.85
9	Zibo Cuju	34	71%	56%	47%	26%	21%	12%	6%	4.36
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	62%	53%	41%	26%	15%	9%	3%	4
11	Shenyang Urban	34	71%	50%	44%	35%	26%	24%	12%	4.7
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	76%	53%	44%	29%	15%	9%	6%	4.45
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	65%	53%	50%	26%	21%	9%	3%	3.97
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	65%	38%	26%	15%	12%	3%	0%	3.29
15	Kunshan	34	65%	53%	29%	9%	6%	6%	3%	3.52
16	Nanjing City	34	68%	53%	35%	26%	9%	3%	3%	3.94
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	62%	44%	26%	15%	6%	3%	0%	3.24
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	68%	44%	38%	32%	26%	21%	15%	4.53

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	88%	71%	59%	59%	35%	29%	24%	5.71
2	Beijing BG	17	71%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	18%	5
3	Qingdao Jonoon	17	59%	35%	29%	6%	6%	6%	0%	3.24
4	BIT	17	71%	59%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	4.75
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	59%	47%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.35
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	29%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.56
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	41%	29%	29%	12%	0%	0%	3.53
8	Nantong Zhiyun	17	47%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	2.82
9	Zibo Cuju	17	76%	71%	59%	41%	29%	24%	12%	5.12
10	Guangxi Baoyun	17	71%	59%	47%	18%	12%	6%	0%	4.06
11	Shenyang Urban	17	76%	59%	53%	35%	24%	24%	6%	4.94
12	Shanghai Jiading	17	71%	53%	47%	35%	12%	6%	6%	4.38
13	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	53%	47%	29%	18%	6%	0%	3.88
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	71%	47%	29%	18%	18%	6%	0%	3.76
15	Kunshan	17	59%	53%	24%	6%	6%	6%	0%	3.31
16	Nanjing City	17	71%	59%	41%	29%	18%	6%	6%	4.12
17	Qingdao Youth Island	17	65%	41%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	3.12
18	Hebei Kungfu	17	59%	41%	35%	29%	24%	12%	6%	4.07

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	76%	65%	47%	35%	18%	18%	0%	4.56
2	Beijing BG	17	76%	76%	65%	53%	47%	29%	6%	5.35
3	Qingdao Jonoon	17	41%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.53
4	BIT	17	71%	65%	53%	41%	35%	18%	18%	5.31
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	71%	65%	41%	18%	6%	6%	5.19
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	53%	41%	24%	24%	18%	18%	4.29
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	71%	65%	59%	41%	18%	18%	12%	4.71
8	Nantong Zhiyun	17	47%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	6%	2.88
9	Zibo Cuju	17	65%	41%	35%	12%	12%	0%	0%	3.56
10	Guangxi Baoyun	17	53%	47%	35%	35%	18%	12%	6%	3.94
11	Shenyang Urban	17	65%	41%	35%	35%	29%	24%	18%	4.47
12	Shanghai Jiading	17	82%	53%	41%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.53
13	Suzhou Dongwu	17	59%	53%	53%	24%	24%	12%	6%	4.06
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	59%	29%	24%	12%	6%	0%	0%	2.82
15	Kunshan	17	71%	53%	35%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3.71
16	Nanjing City	17	65%	47%	29%	24%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
17	Qingdao Youth Island	17	59%	47%	29%	12%	12%	6%	0%	3.35
18	Hebei Kungfu	17	76%	47%	41%	35%	29%	29%	24%	4.94