Estadísticas de Shanghai SIPG

Team Info

Temporada

2024

País

China

Estadio

Shanghai Stadium

Competición

China

Super Liga China

Asia

AFC Champions League

Resumen Calendario de Partidos Resultados del Partido Equipo Mejores Jugadores Clasificación

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería a Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	10	80%	70%	70%	60%	50%	40%	30%	11.7
2	Henan Jianye	12	92%	83%	83%	58%	58%	42%	17%	11.58
3	Hangzhou	12	92%	92%	75%	50%	33%	25%	17%	11.08
4	Shanghai Shenhua	12	75%	75%	58%	58%	58%	33%	25%	11.08
5	Qingdao Jonoon	12	83%	75%	58%	50%	50%	42%	42%	10.75
6	Tianjin Teda	12	92%	67%	58%	50%	25%	17%	8%	10.58
7	Meizhou Hakka	11	91%	82%	64%	36%	27%	18%	9%	10.46
8	Beijing Guoan	12	83%	67%	58%	42%	33%	17%	8%	10.42
9	Sichuan Jiuniu	12	75%	58%	50%	50%	25%	25%	25%	10.41
10	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	12	83%	75%	67%	25%	17%	17%	17%	9.83
11	Qingdao Youth Island	11	73%	55%	55%	36%	18%	9%	9%	9.82
12	Chengdu Better City FC	12	75%	58%	50%	33%	25%	25%	25%	9.75
13	Shandong Luneng	12	83%	58%	50%	33%	25%	8%	8%	9.5
14	Wuhan Three Towns	12	83%	67%	58%	25%	17%	8%	8%	9.42
15	Nantong Zhiyun	12	67%	58%	50%	33%	33%	17%	17%	9.33
16	Changchun Yatai	12	50%	33%	33%	25%	17%	17%	8%	7.92

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	5	80%	60%	60%	60%	40%	20%	20%	10.6
2	Henan Jianye	6	100%	83%	83%	83%	83%	67%	33%	12.84
3	Hangzhou	7	86%	86%	86%	71%	43%	29%	14%	11.57
4	Shanghai Shenhua	6	67%	67%	50%	50%	50%	17%	17%	9.83
5	Qingdao Jonoon	5	80%	60%	60%	60%	60%	60%	60%	11
6	Tianjin Teda	5	80%	80%	60%	60%	40%	20%	20%	11.6
7	Meizhou Hakka	6	100%	83%	50%	17%	17%	17%	17%	10.67
8	Beijing Guoan	5	80%	80%	80%	40%	20%	20%	0%	10
9	Sichuan Jiuniu	6	83%	67%	50%	50%	33%	33%	33%	11.66
10	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	7	86%	71%	57%	14%	14%	14%	14%	9.57
11	Qingdao Youth Island	5	60%	40%	40%	40%	20%	0%	0%	8.6
12	Chengdu Better City FC	7	71%	57%	57%	29%	29%	29%	29%	9.85
13	Shandong Luneng	7	86%	71%	57%	43%	29%	14%	14%	10
14	Wuhan Three Towns	6	100%	83%	67%	0%	0%	0%	0%	9.5
15	Nantong Zhiyun	5	40%	40%	40%	20%	20%	0%	0%	7
16	Changchun Yatai	6	67%	33%	33%	33%	17%	17%	0%	8.67

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	5	80%	80%	80%	60%	60%	60%	40%	12.8
2	Henan Jianye	6	83%	83%	83%	33%	33%	17%	0%	10.33
3	Hangzhou	5	100%	100%	60%	20%	20%	20%	20%	10.4
4	Shanghai Shenhua	6	83%	83%	67%	67%	67%	50%	33%	12.34
5	Qingdao Jonoon	7	86%	86%	57%	43%	43%	29%	29%	10.57
6	Tianjin Teda	7	100%	57%	57%	43%	14%	14%	0%	9.86
7	Meizhou Hakka	5	80%	80%	80%	60%	40%	20%	0%	10.2
8	Beijing Guoan	7	86%	57%	43%	43%	43%	14%	14%	10.71
9	Sichuan Jiuniu	6	67%	50%	50%	50%	17%	17%	17%	9.16
10	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	5	80%	80%	80%	40%	20%	20%	20%	10.2
11	Qingdao Youth Island	6	83%	67%	67%	33%	17%	17%	17%	10.84
12	Chengdu Better City FC	5	80%	60%	40%	40%	20%	20%	20%	9.6
13	Shandong Luneng	5	80%	40%	40%	20%	20%	0%	0%	8.8
14	Wuhan Three Towns	6	67%	50%	50%	50%	33%	17%	17%	9.34
15	Nantong Zhiyun	7	86%	71%	57%	43%	43%	29%	29%	11
16	Changchun Yatai	6	33%	33%	33%	17%	17%	17%	17%	7.17

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	12	50%	42%	33%	17%	8%	8%	8%	3.5
2	Shanghai SIPG	10	100%	90%	80%	80%	80%	30%	30%	7.4
3	Henan Jianye	12	100%	83%	75%	67%	33%	33%	25%	6.58
4	Hangzhou	12	83%	75%	67%	67%	58%	50%	33%	6.83
5	Beijing Guoan	12	83%	58%	58%	58%	42%	33%	17%	5.67
6	Changchun Yatai	12	50%	25%	8%	8%	8%	0%	0%	2.92
7	Shandong Luneng	12	75%	75%	75%	67%	42%	17%	17%	5.75
8	Shanghai Shenhua	12	92%	83%	67%	50%	42%	33%	33%	6.83
9	Tianjin Teda	12	75%	67%	42%	25%	17%	17%	17%	5
10	Meizhou Hakka	11	73%	55%	36%	18%	9%	9%	0%	3.64
11	Qingdao Jonoon	12	67%	50%	25%	25%	17%	0%	0%	3.83
12	Nantong Zhiyun	12	75%	50%	42%	42%	25%	25%	17%	4.58
13	Wuhan Three Towns	12	67%	42%	25%	25%	25%	25%	0%	3.75
14	Chengdu Better City FC	12	100%	92%	75%	67%	50%	33%	17%	6.83
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	12	75%	67%	50%	50%	25%	17%	8%	4.83
16	Qingdao Youth Island	11	82%	55%	36%	9%	9%	9%	0%	3.91

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	7	71%	57%	43%	14%	0%	0%	0%	3.86
2	Shanghai SIPG	5	100%	100%	80%	80%	80%	40%	40%	7.4
3	Henan Jianye	6	100%	100%	100%	100%	67%	67%	50%	8.67
4	Hangzhou	7	86%	71%	71%	71%	71%	57%	43%	7.57
5	Beijing Guoan	5	80%	80%	80%	80%	60%	60%	40%	7.2
6	Changchun Yatai	6	83%	33%	17%	17%	17%	0%	0%	3.67
7	Shandong Luneng	7	86%	86%	86%	71%	57%	29%	29%	6.86
8	Shanghai Shenhua	6	100%	100%	83%	50%	50%	33%	33%	7
9	Tianjin Teda	5	80%	60%	40%	40%	40%	40%	40%	6.4
10	Meizhou Hakka	6	83%	67%	67%	33%	17%	17%	0%	4.67
11	Qingdao Jonoon	5	80%	60%	60%	60%	40%	0%	0%	5
12	Nantong Zhiyun	5	60%	20%	20%	20%	20%	20%	20%	3.2
13	Wuhan Three Towns	6	100%	83%	50%	50%	50%	50%	0%	5.83
14	Chengdu Better City FC	7	100%	100%	86%	71%	57%	43%	29%	7.71
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	6	100%	100%	83%	83%	33%	17%	17%	6.33
16	Qingdao Youth Island	5	80%	60%	40%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.6

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	5	20%	20%	20%	20%	20%	20%	20%	3
2	Shanghai SIPG	5	100%	80%	80%	80%	80%	20%	20%	7.4
3	Henan Jianye	6	100%	67%	50%	33%	0%	0%	0%	4.5
4	Hangzhou	5	80%	80%	60%	60%	40%	40%	20%	5.8
5	Beijing Guoan	7	86%	43%	43%	43%	29%	14%	0%	4.57
6	Changchun Yatai	6	17%	17%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.17
7	Shandong Luneng	5	60%	60%	60%	60%	20%	0%	0%	4.2
8	Shanghai Shenhua	6	83%	67%	50%	50%	33%	33%	33%	6.67
9	Tianjin Teda	7	71%	71%	43%	14%	0%	0%	0%	4
10	Meizhou Hakka	5	60%	40%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.4
11	Qingdao Jonoon	7	57%	43%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3
12	Nantong Zhiyun	7	86%	71%	57%	57%	29%	29%	14%	5.57
13	Wuhan Three Towns	6	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1.67
14	Chengdu Better City FC	5	100%	80%	60%	60%	40%	20%	0%	5.6
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	6	50%	33%	17%	17%	17%	17%	0%	3.33
16	Qingdao Youth Island	6	83%	50%	33%	17%	17%	17%	0%	4.17

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	12	100%	92%	83%	67%	42%	42%	8%	6.33
2	Shanghai SIPG	10	60%	50%	50%	40%	20%	10%	10%	4.3
3	Henan Jianye	12	83%	67%	50%	42%	42%	8%	8%	5
4	Hangzhou	12	67%	50%	50%	42%	17%	8%	0%	4.25
5	Beijing Guoan	12	75%	58%	50%	25%	25%	17%	17%	4.75
6	Changchun Yatai	12	83%	58%	33%	33%	25%	25%	17%	5
7	Shandong Luneng	12	67%	50%	33%	17%	8%	0%	0%	3.75
8	Shanghai Shenhua	12	67%	33%	33%	33%	33%	17%	17%	4.25
9	Tianjin Teda	12	92%	92%	67%	50%	33%	25%	8%	5.58
10	Meizhou Hakka	11	82%	64%	55%	55%	55%	45%	45%	6.82
11	Qingdao Jonoon	12	83%	83%	83%	75%	58%	50%	25%	6.92
12	Nantong Zhiyun	12	92%	67%	42%	42%	25%	8%	0%	4.75
13	Wuhan Three Towns	12	75%	67%	50%	50%	33%	33%	25%	5.67
14	Chengdu Better City FC	12	50%	33%	17%	17%	0%	0%	0%	2.92
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	12	75%	50%	42%	42%	33%	33%	33%	5.58
16	Qingdao Youth Island	11	91%	91%	55%	45%	36%	18%	9%	5.91

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	7	100%	86%	71%	57%	29%	29%	0%	5.71
2	Shanghai SIPG	5	40%	40%	40%	20%	0%	0%	0%	3.2
3	Henan Jianye	6	67%	50%	33%	17%	17%	17%	17%	4.17
4	Hangzhou	7	57%	43%	43%	29%	14%	14%	0%	4
5	Beijing Guoan	5	40%	40%	20%	20%	20%	0%	0%	2.8
6	Changchun Yatai	6	100%	67%	33%	33%	17%	17%	17%	5
7	Shandong Luneng	7	57%	29%	14%	14%	0%	0%	0%	3.14
8	Shanghai Shenhua	6	50%	17%	17%	17%	17%	0%	0%	2.83
9	Tianjin Teda	5	80%	80%	60%	60%	40%	20%	0%	5.2
10	Meizhou Hakka	6	83%	50%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	6
11	Qingdao Jonoon	5	80%	80%	80%	80%	60%	40%	0%	6
12	Nantong Zhiyun	5	80%	40%	20%	20%	20%	0%	0%	3.8
13	Wuhan Three Towns	6	50%	50%	33%	33%	0%	0%	0%	3.67
14	Chengdu Better City FC	7	43%	14%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.14
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	6	67%	50%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	5.33
16	Qingdao Youth Island	5	100%	100%	40%	40%	20%	0%	0%	5

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	5	100%	100%	100%	80%	60%	60%	20%	7.2
2	Shanghai SIPG	5	80%	60%	60%	60%	40%	20%	20%	5.4
3	Henan Jianye	6	100%	83%	67%	67%	67%	0%	0%	5.83
4	Hangzhou	5	80%	60%	60%	60%	20%	0%	0%	4.6
5	Beijing Guoan	7	100%	71%	71%	29%	29%	29%	29%	6.14
6	Changchun Yatai	6	67%	50%	33%	33%	33%	33%	17%	5
7	Shandong Luneng	5	80%	80%	60%	20%	20%	0%	0%	4.6
8	Shanghai Shenhua	6	83%	50%	50%	50%	50%	33%	33%	5.67
9	Tianjin Teda	7	100%	100%	71%	43%	29%	29%	14%	5.86
10	Meizhou Hakka	5	80%	80%	80%	80%	80%	60%	60%	7.8
11	Qingdao Jonoon	7	86%	86%	86%	71%	57%	57%	43%	7.57
12	Nantong Zhiyun	7	100%	86%	57%	57%	29%	14%	0%	5.43
13	Wuhan Three Towns	6	100%	83%	67%	67%	67%	67%	50%	7.67
14	Chengdu Better City FC	5	60%	60%	40%	40%	0%	0%	0%	4
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	6	83%	50%	50%	50%	33%	33%	33%	5.83
16	Qingdao Youth Island	6	83%	83%	67%	50%	50%	33%	17%	6.67